The award of all contracts subject to sections 307.86 to 307.92 of the Revised Code shall be made to the lowest and best bidder. The bond or bid guaranty of all unsuccessful bidders shall be returned to them by the contracting authority immediately upon awarding the contract or rejection of all bids. The contracting authority may reject all bids.
State ex rel. Hanson v. Guernsey Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 65 Ohio St. 3d 545 (1992). · cites it 3דHis complaint alleged that the board had failed to award the contract to the lowest and best bidder pursuant to R.C. 307.90. The court of appeals initially granted Hanson's request for an alternative writ, ordering the board to show cause on June 21, 1991 why the peremptory writ…”
State ex rel. Gaylor, Inc. v. Goodenow, 2010-Ohio-1844, 125 Ohio 5. · cites it 4דAnd a common pleas court action would not constitute an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law, because Gaylor seeks extraordinary relief in the nature of a mandatory injunction to compel respondents to apply the criteria in a lawful fashion in assessing whether its bid…”
Bd. of Comm'rs v. Umbehr, 518 U.S. 668 (1996). · cites it 2ד1995); Ohio Rev. Code Ann. §§ 307.90 , 511.12 (1994); id.”
State ex rel. Boccuzzi v. Cuyahoga Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 860 N.E.2d 749 (Ohio 2007). · cites it 4ד” {¶ 9} More specifically, appellants claimed that the commissioners had a duty to award the sanitary-sewer portion of the project separately to the lowest bidder, Fabrizi, pursuant to R.C. 307.90 and 153.61, which govern the joint-construction agreements between the county and…”
TriHealth, Inc. v. Bd. of Commissioners, 347 F. Supp. 2d 548 (S.D. Ohio 2004). · cites it 2דThe Court went on to note that the relevant section of the Ohio Revised Code in that case, Section 307.90, required that publicly bid contracts be awarded to the “lowest and best bidder.”
State ex rel. Executone of Nw. Ohio, Inc. v. Commissioners, 465 N.E.2d 416 (Ohio 1984). “” Since under R.C. 307.90 the determination of which bid constituted the “lowest and best bid” involved the exercise of a certain degree of discretion by appellees, appellant’s complaint merely asked the court of appeals to substitute its discretion for that which was exercised…”
State ex rel. C.S. Burge, Inc. v. Fulton Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 622 N.E.2d 1091 (Ohio Ct. App. 6th Dist. 1993). “2d 416, 417 , relying upon R.C. 307.90. In such instances, mandamus will not lie absent a clear showing of an abuse of discretion on the part of the commissioners in refusing to perform an act.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 307.90(A): 2 cases
State ex rel. Gaylor, Inc. v. Goodenow, 2010-Ohio-1844, 125 Ohio 5. “And a common pleas court action would not constitute an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law, because Gaylor seeks extraordinary relief in the nature of a mandatory injunction to compel respondents to apply the criteria in a lawful fashion in assessing whether its bid…”
State ex rel. Boccuzzi v. Cuyahoga Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 860 N.E.2d 749 (Ohio 2007). “” {¶ 9} More specifically, appellants claimed that the commissioners had a duty to award the sanitary-sewer portion of the project separately to the lowest bidder, Fabrizi, pursuant to R.C. 307.90 and 153.61, which govern the joint-construction agreements between the county and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.