Notes of Decisions
Cited in
85
cases (
11 in the last 5 years), 1953–2026 · leading case:
Yenni v. Yenni, 2022 Ohio 2867 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
Yenni v. Yenni, 2022 Ohio 2867 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
· cites it 6× “Wife’s complaint put Husband on notice that she sought a divorce based upon any and all grounds listed under R.C. 3105.01, satisfying the rigors of Civ.”
Lehman v. Lehman, 593 N.E.2d 447 (Ohio Ct. App. 1991).
· cites it 11× “In that regard, the General Assembly has set forth specific statutory grounds for divorce in R.C. 3105.01 which establish this state’s public policy framework for terminating the marital relationship.”
Morris v. Morris (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 5002 (Ohio 2016).
· cites it 2× “See R.C. 3105.01. In resolving a complaint for divorce, a trial court is required to make a determination of separate property and marital property, a property- division award, a determination of the allocation of parental rights and responsibilities and child support, and—after…”
Boyd v. Edwards, 446 N.E.2d 1151 (Ohio Ct. App. 1982).
· cites it 5× “6 R.C. 3105.01, Grounds for divorce: “The court of common pleas may grant divorces for the following causes: “(K) On the application of either party, when husband and wife have, without interruption for two years, lived separate and apart without cohabitation, and four years in…”
Condit v. Condit, 943 N.E.2d 1041 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010).
· cites it 5× “Grounds for Divorce — Living Separate and Apart {¶ 15} In his fourth, fifth, and seventh assignments of error, James takes issue with the trial court’s decision granting a divorce on the basis that the parties had “without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart…”
Cassaro v. Cassaro, 363 N.E.2d 753 (Ohio Ct. App. 1976).
· cites it 4× “The court erred in granting a divorce under Section 3105.01 (K) of the Ohio Revised Code where the alleged living apart without cohabitation for a period of two years preceded the effective date of the statute.”
Broach v. Broach, 895 N.E.2d 640 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 10× “{¶ 14} R.C. 3105.01 provides that a court of common pleas may grant divorces on proof of any one or more of 11 separate causes.”
Gross v. Gross, 464 N.E.2d 500 (Ohio 1984).
· cites it 2× “Although the Ohio Act does not eliminate the laws relating to divorce based upon fault of one party that are set forth in R.C. 3105.01, 9 the new Act is a further legislative recognition of the right of married parties to contract regarding a breakdown of a marriage, as had been…”
Marrs v. Mickel, 2023 Ohio 4528 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
· cites it 3× “On October 23, 2019, Mickel filed an answer and counterclaim for divorce in which she denied Marrs’ allegations of neglect, adultery and cruelty against her and alleged that Marrs had “acted or, * * * failed to act, in a manner which entitles [Mickel] to a divorce” pursuant to…”
Michael D.C. v. Wanda L.C., 497 S.E.2d 531 (W. Va. 1997).
“CentCode § 14-05-03(1) (1991); Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 3105.01(c) (1995); Olda.”
Dailey v. Dailey, 463 N.E.2d 427 (Ohio Ct. App. 1983).
· cites it 4× “” R.C. 3105.01 reads, in pertinent part, as follows: “The court of common pleas may grant divorces for the following causes: * * “(K) On the application of either party, when husband and wife have without interruption for two years, lived separate and apart without cohabitation,…”
Carnes v. Carnes, 2015 Ohio 2925 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 5× “{¶17} Thus, Molly met the first prong of the Civ.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3105.01(A) — 6 cases
Carnes v. Carnes, 2015 Ohio 2925 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
“{¶17} Thus, Molly met the first prong of the Civ.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3105.01(B) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3105.01(C) — 2 cases
Marrs v. Mickel, 2023 Ohio 4528 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
“On October 23, 2019, Mickel filed an answer and counterclaim for divorce in which she denied Marrs’ allegations of neglect, adultery and cruelty against her and alleged that Marrs had “acted or, * * * failed to act, in a manner which entitles [Mickel] to a divorce” pursuant to…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3105.01(D) — 2 cases
Broach v. Broach, 895 N.E.2d 640 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008).
“{¶ 14} R.C. 3105.01 provides that a court of common pleas may grant divorces on proof of any one or more of 11 separate causes.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3105.01(E) — 2 cases
Broach v. Broach, 895 N.E.2d 640 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008).
“{¶ 14} R.C. 3105.01 provides that a court of common pleas may grant divorces on proof of any one or more of 11 separate causes.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3105.01(F) — 3 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3105.01(G) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3105.01(J) — 10 cases
Condit v. Condit, 943 N.E.2d 1041 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010).
“Grounds for Divorce — Living Separate and Apart {¶ 15} In his fourth, fifth, and seventh assignments of error, James takes issue with the trial court’s decision granting a divorce on the basis that the parties had “without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart…”
Broach v. Broach, 895 N.E.2d 640 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008).
“{¶ 14} R.C. 3105.01 provides that a court of common pleas may grant divorces on proof of any one or more of 11 separate causes.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3105.01(K) — 20 cases
Boyd v. Edwards, 446 N.E.2d 1151 (Ohio Ct. App. 1982).
“6 R.C. 3105.01, Grounds for divorce: “The court of common pleas may grant divorces for the following causes: “(K) On the application of either party, when husband and wife have, without interruption for two years, lived separate and apart without cohabitation, and four years in…”
Lehman v. Lehman, 593 N.E.2d 447 (Ohio Ct. App. 1991).
“In that regard, the General Assembly has set forth specific statutory grounds for divorce in R.C. 3105.01 which establish this state’s public policy framework for terminating the marital relationship.”
Dailey v. Dailey, 463 N.E.2d 427 (Ohio Ct. App. 1983).
“” R.C. 3105.01 reads, in pertinent part, as follows: “The court of common pleas may grant divorces for the following causes: * * “(K) On the application of either party, when husband and wife have without interruption for two years, lived separate and apart without cohabitation,…”
Carnes v. Carnes, 2015 Ohio 2925 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
“{¶17} Thus, Molly met the first prong of the Civ.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3105.01(c) — 1 case
Michael D.C. v. Wanda L.C., 497 S.E.2d 531 (W. Va. 1997).
“CentCode § 14-05-03(1) (1991); Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 3105.01(c) (1995); Olda.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.