Sections 3111.88 to 3111.96 of the Revised Code deal with non-spousal artificial insemination for the purpose of impregnating a woman so that she can bear a child that she intends to raise as her child. These sections do not deal with the artificial insemination of a wife with the semen of her husband or with surrogate motherhood.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2006–2007 · leading case: J.F. v. D.B., 116 Ohio St. 3d 363 (2007).
J.F. v. D.B., 116 Ohio St. 3d 363 (2007). “1(C)(6) of the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County, Probate Division (“All surrogacy adoptions shall be treated as non-relative adoptions”) and Loc.”
J.F. v. D.B., 2007-Ohio-6750. “1(C)(6) of the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County, Probate Division (“All surrogacy adoptions shall be treated as non-relative adoptions”) and Loc.”
Nemcek v. Paskey, 849 N.E.2d 108 (2006). “R.C. 3111.89 specifically provides that R.”
J.F. v. D.B., 165 Ohio App. 3d 791 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 2006). “{¶ 17} The Summit County Common Pleas Court found that the provisions at issue were in violation of Ohio’s public policy against private agreements to forgo parental rights.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.