Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 3307.53 (2026)

Computing service credit

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The state teachers retirement board shall credit a year of service to any teacher participating in the STRS defined benefit plan who is employed on a full-time basis in a school district for the number of months the regular day schools of such district are in session in said district within any year. The board shall adopt appropriate rules and regulations for the determination of credit for less than a complete year of service, and shall be the final authority in determining the number of years of service credit. The board shall credit not more than one year for all service rendered in any year.

The board shall adopt rules for the purpose of determining the number of years or partial years of service credit to be granted to a member under section 3307.25 of the Revised Code. The amount of service credit shall be based on the member's length of participation in and contribution to an STRS defined contribution plan. The board shall be the final authority in determining the amount of service credit.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1997–2021 · leading case: State ex rel. Kabert v. Shaker Heights City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., 676 N.E.2d 101 (Ohio 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Kabert v. Shaker Heights City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., 676 N.E.2d 101 (Ohio 1997). “R.C. 3307.53. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, we grant a writ of mandamus compelling the board to pay relators the difference between the amounts they were paid as tutors and the amounts they were entitled to receive under the teachers’ salary schedules for school years…”
State ex rel. Kabert v. Shaker Hts. City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Edn., 1997 Ohio 242 (Ohio 1997). · cites it 2× “R.C. 3307.53. {¶ 5} In October 1995, the superintendent of the school district requested that the association bargain on behalf of tutors employed by the board.”
State ex rel. Anderson v. State Teachers Ret. Sys. Bd., 2021 Ohio 1378 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 4× “R.C. 3307.53. And the administrative code in effect at the time of Anderson's disputed years of service provided in part as follows: (A) As used in section 3307.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.