Go Syfert

Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 3313.31 (2026)

Treasurer to perform all duties relating to moneys

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Effective:

March 20, 2019

Latest Legislation:

House Bill 491 - 132nd General Assembly

PDF:

Download Authenticated PDF

(A) All the duties and obligations of the county auditor, county treasurer, or other officer or person relating to the moneys of a school district shall be complied with by dealing with the treasurer of the board of education thereof.

The treasurer shall be the chief fiscal officer of the school district, shall be responsible for the financial affairs of the district, and shall report to and is subject to the direction of the district board of education. Except as otherwise required by law, no treasurer shall be required to verify the accuracy of nonfinancial information or data of the school district.

No treasurer shall be liable for a loss of public funds that results from a treasurer's reliance on the accuracy of nonfinancial information or data of the school district, including reports in the education management information system under section 3301.0714 of the Revised Code, pupil transportation reports, and licensure or other credentialing information unless the loss results from the treasurer's negligence or other wrongful act.

(B) Notwithstanding any provision of the Revised Code to the contrary, but subject to section 3319.40 of the Revised Code, in all school districts and educational service centers, the treasurer shall direct and assign employees directly engaged in the day-to-day fiscal operations of the district or service center, as those employees are so designated by the board of the district or service center.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 9 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1999–2026 · leading case: Bd. of Educ. v. Bd. of Revision, 85 Ohio St. 3d 156 (Ohio 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Bd. of Educ. v. Bd. of Revision, 85 Ohio St. 3d 156 (Ohio 1999). · cites it 2× “R.C. 3313.31 provides that “[a]ll the duties and obligations of the county auditor, county treasurer, or other officer or person relating to the moneys of a school district shall be complied with by dealing with the treasurer of the board of education thereof.”

Lawless v. Lawrence Cty. Bd. of Edn., 2020 Ohio 117 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “The Board also asserts that “[i]f nothing else,” the special audit report and charges described in Lawless’ termination notice, which were exhibits to Lawless’ deposition, demonstrate her failure to perform prior to 5 The Board quoted this statute in its appellant’s brief but…”

oapse/afscme Local 4 v. Berdine, 880 N.E.2d 939 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 4× “04 provides, “The business manager shall have the care and custody of all property of the school district, real or personal, except moneys * * {¶23} OAPSE further observes that R.C. 3313.31 provides, “The treasurer shall be the chief fiscal officer of the school district and…”

Durastanti v. Durastanti, 2020 Ohio 4687 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “It contains “a set of provisions uniquely applicable to” the special statutory proceedings in R.C. 3313.31. See Weber v. Forinash, 6th Dist.”

Dietrich v. Dietrich, 2023 Ohio 4822 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). “It contains a set of provisions uniquely crafted for the particular statutory proceedings in R.C. 3313.31. See Weber v. Forinash, 6th Dist.”

K.N. v. Render, 2019 Ohio 3981 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “Render maintains that the statute requires that the person to be protected must have a fear of imminent harm in order to be granted a protection order under R.C. 2903.214. However, he has not pointed to any case law that would support that position.”

Worthington City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision, 1999 Ohio 449 (Ohio 1999). · cites it 2× “R.C. 3313.31 provides that “[a]ll the duties and obligations of the county auditor, county treasurer, or other officer or person relating to the moneys of a school district shall be complied with by dealing with the treasurer of the board of education thereof.”

B.L.L. v. M.T., 2021 Ohio 4300 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). “It contains a set of provisions uniquely crafted for the particular statutory proceedings in R.C. 3313.31. See Weber v. Forinash, 6th Dist.”

State ex rel. Attorney Gen. v. Hamm, 2026 Ohio 2304 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026). “) R.C. 3313.31(A). By contrast, community schools are “independent of any school district.”

— Ohio Rev. Code § 3313.31(A) — 1 case

State ex rel. Attorney Gen. v. Hamm, 2026 Ohio 2304 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026). “) R.C. 3313.31(A). By contrast, community schools are “independent of any school district.”

— Ohio Rev. Code § 3313.31(A)(1)(a)(ii) — 1 case

K.N. v. Render, 2019 Ohio 3981 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “Render maintains that the statute requires that the person to be protected must have a fear of imminent harm in order to be granted a protection order under R.C. 2903.214. However, he has not pointed to any case law that would support that position.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.