(A)(1) A board of education may permit all or part of any of the schools under its control, upon request of a proposing person or group and provided the person or group meets the requirements of this chapter, to become a community school.
(2) Any person or group of individuals may propose the creation of a community school pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. No nonpublic chartered or nonchartered school in existence on January 1, 1997, is eligible to become a community school under this chapter.
(B) A community school created under this chapter is a public school, independent of any school district, and is part of the state's program of education. A community school may sue and be sued, acquire facilities as needed, contract for any services necessary for the operation of the school, and enter into contracts with a sponsor pursuant to this chapter. The governing authority of a community school may carry out any act and ensure the performance of any function that is in compliance with the Ohio Constitution, this chapter, other statutes applicable to community schools, and the contract entered into under this chapter establishing the school.
State ex rel. Ohio Cong. of Parents & Teachers v. State Bd. of Educ., 857 N.E.2d 1148 (Ohio 2006). · cites it 7ד08(D), but each is privately run, R.C. 3314.01 and 3314.02(B) and (C)(1). Each community school must be formed as either a nonprofit corporation or a public-benefit corporation.”
Elec. Classroom of Tomorrow v. Ohio Dept. of Edn. (Slip Opinion), 2018-Ohio-3126, 118 N.E.3d 907. · cites it 4ד08(C)(1) first states that ODE is obligated to pay a community school “on a full-time equivalency basis, for each student enrolled.” {¶ 13} R.C. 3314.08(H) then states that ODE “shall adjust the amounts subtracted and paid under division (C) of this section to reflect any…”
Anderson/Maltbie P'ship v. Levin, 2010-Ohio-4904, 127 Ohio St. 3d 178. · cites it 4ד, a for-profit partnership. Analysis {¶ 13} This case presents a significant issue that arises in the context of Ohio’s community schools.”
Cincinnati City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Conners, 2012-Ohio-2447, 132 Ohio St. 3d 468. · cites it 4דChapter 3314, the General Assembly declared that its purposes included “providing parents a choice of academic environments for their children and providing the education community with the opportunity to establish limited experimental educational programs in a deregulated…”
Riester v. Riverside Cmty. Sch., 257 F. Supp. 2d 968 (S.D. Ohio 2002). · cites it 5דThe language of O.R.C. § 3314.01, “[a] community school created under this chapter is a public school” could not be more clear.”
Cordray v. Int'l Preparatory Sch., 2010-Ohio-6136, 128 Ohio St. 3d 50. “” {¶ 24} The General Assembly made clear in R.C. 3314.01(B) that community schools are public schools: “A community school created under this chapter is a public school, independent of any school district, and is part of the state’s program of education.”
Bd. of Trs. SABIS Int'l Sch. v. Montgomery, 205 F. Supp. 2d 835 (S.D. Ohio 2002). · cites it 2ד1 Pursuant to Ohio Rev.Code § 3314.01(B): A community school created under this chapter is a public school, independent of any school district, and is part of the state’s program of education.”
State ex rel. Ohio Cong. of Parents & Teachers v. State Bd. of Educ., 857 N.E.2d 1148 (Ohio 2006). “08(D), but each is privately run, R.C. 3314.01 and 3314.02(B) and (C)(1). Each community school must be formed as either a nonprofit corporation or a public-benefit corporation.”
Elec. Classroom of Tomorrow v. Ohio Dept. of Edn. (Slip Opinion), 2018-Ohio-3126, 118 N.E.3d 907. “08(C)(1) first states that ODE is obligated to pay a community school “on a full-time equivalency basis, for each student enrolled.” {¶ 13} R.C. 3314.08(H) then states that ODE “shall adjust the amounts subtracted and paid under division (C) of this section to reflect any…”
Anderson/Maltbie P'ship v. Levin, 2010-Ohio-4904, 127 Ohio St. 3d 178. “, a for-profit partnership. Analysis {¶ 13} This case presents a significant issue that arises in the context of Ohio’s community schools.”
Cincinnati City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Conners, 2012-Ohio-2447, 132 Ohio St. 3d 468. “Chapter 3314, the General Assembly declared that its purposes included “providing parents a choice of academic environments for their children and providing the education community with the opportunity to establish limited experimental educational programs in a deregulated…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.