Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 3317.14 (2026)

Boards to annually adopt teachers' salary schedule

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any school district board of education or educational service center governing board participating in funds distributed under Chapter 3317. of the Revised Code shall annually adopt a teachers' salary schedule with provision for increments based upon training and years of service. Notwithstanding sections 3317.13 and 3319.088 of the Revised Code, the board may establish its own service requirements and may grant service credit for such activities as teaching in public or nonpublic schools in this state or in another state, for service as an educational assistant other than as a classroom aide employed in accordance with section 5107.541 of the Revised Code, and for service in the military or in an appropriate state or federal governmental agency, provided no teacher receives less than the amount required to be paid pursuant to section 3317.13 of the Revised Code and provided full credit for a minimum of five years of actual teaching and military experience as defined in division (A) of section 3317.13 of the Revised Code is given to each teacher.

Each teacher who has completed training which would qualify such teacher for a higher salary bracket pursuant to this section shall file by the fifteenth day of September with the treasurer of the board of education or educational service center satisfactory evidence of the completion of such additional training. The treasurer shall then immediately place the teacher, pursuant to this section and section 3317.13 of the Revised Code, in the proper salary bracket in accordance with training and years of service before certifying such salary, training, and years of service to the department of education and workforce. No teacher shall be paid less than the salary to which such teacher is entitled pursuant to section 3317.13 of the Revised Code.

Last updated August 21, 2023 at 10:17 AM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 37 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1968–2025 · leading case: State ex rel. Kabert v. Shaker Heights City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., 676 N.E.2d 101 (Ohio 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Kabert v. Shaker Heights City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., 676 N.E.2d 101 (Ohio 1997). · cites it 14× “Relators are public employees who claim wages pursuant to R.C. 3317.14 and related benefits under R.”
State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., 641 N.E.2d 188 (Ohio 1994). · cites it 7× “” Since appellants were not covered by the agreements, R.”
Reed v. Rhodes, 422 F. Supp. 708 (N.D. Ohio 1976). · cites it 9× “THE GOVERNOR AND ATTORNEY GENERAL On June 11, 1956, the newly created State Board of Education passed a resolution seeking an opinion of the Ohio Attorney General as to the construction and applicability of § 3317.14 O.R.C. That section states in pertinent part: “A school…”
State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Edn., 71 Ohio St. 3d 26 (1994). · cites it 9× “The tutors' salary schedules did not provide for increments based upon training and were not SUPREME COURT OF OHIO filed with the Superintendent of Public Instruction pursuant to R.C. 3317.14. During school years 1986-1987 through 1990-1991, the board made contributions to the…”
State ex rel. Kabert v. Shaker Hts. City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Edn., 78 Ohio St. 3d 37 (1997). · cites it 14× “Relators are public employees who claim wages pursuant to R.C. 3317.14 and related benefits under R.”
Reed v. Rhodes, 500 F. Supp. 404 (N.D. Ohio 1980). · cites it 8× “” O.R.C. 3317.14, Attorney General’s Opinion, July 9, 1956 (Plaintiffs’ Exhibit [Trial] 383).”
State ex rel. Madden v. Windham Exempted Vill. Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., 537 N.E.2d 646 (Ohio 1989). · cites it 4× “Thus, if relator has a clear legal right to compensation under R.C. 3317.14 and respondent has a clear legal duty to pay such compensation, mandamus is the appropriate remedy.”
Bernardini v. Bd. of Educ., 387 N.E.2d 1222 (Ohio 1979). · cites it 2× “06 read as follows : “A board of education shall provide in the teachers salary schedule, adopted pursuant to section 3317.14 of the Revised Code, that each teacher employed by the board shall be given full credit on stich schedule for each year of service outside the district…”
Penick v. Columbus Bd. of Educ., 519 F. Supp. 925 (S.D. Ohio 1981). · cites it 5× “The term ‘law’ as used in section 3317.14, Revised Code [presently codified at Ohio Rev.”
State ex rel. Brown v. Milton-Union Exempted Vill. Bd. of Educ., 531 N.E.2d 1297 (Ohio 1988). · cites it 3× “With respect to salary schedules for teachers, R.C. 3317.14 provides in pertinent part: “Any board of education participating in funds distributed under Chapter 3317.”
Penick v. Columbus Bd. of Educ., 429 F. Supp. 229 (S.D. Ohio 1977). · cites it 2× “The Attorney General opined: Following a' determination by the state board of education that a school district “has not conformed with the law” so as to require the withholding of state funds as provided in Section 3317.14, Revised Code, such board and the controlling board,…”
Maple Heights Teachers Ass'n v. Maple Heights Bd. of Educ., 453 N.E.2d 619 (Ohio 1983). · cites it 16× “* * R.C. 3317.14 reads in pertinent part: “Any board of education participating in funds distributed under Chapter 3317.”
Show all 37 citing cases →
Ohio Rev. Code § 3317.14(C): 1 case
State ex rel. Johnston v. N. Olmsted City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Edn., 2025-Ohio-1233, 265 N.E.3d 1181.
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.