Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 3341
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 3341.04 (2026)

Powers of boards of trustees regarding president, professors and other employees

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
October 16, 1961
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 326 - 104th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

The boards of trustees of Bowling Green state university and Kent state university, respectively, shall elect, fix the compensation of, and remove the president and such number of professors, teachers, and other employees as may be deemed necessary by said boards. The boards shall do all things necessary for the proper maintenance and successful and continuous operation of such universities.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1986–2014 · leading case: Waliga v. Bd. of Trs. of Kent State Univ., 488 N.E.2d 850 (Ohio 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Waliga v. Bd. of Trs. of Kent State Univ., 488 N.E.2d 850 (Ohio 1986). “” R.C. 3341.04 *57 provides, in part, that the universities “shall do all things necessary for the proper maintenance and successful and continuous operation of such universities.”
Crook v. Baker, 813 F.2d 88 (6th Cir. 1987). “The court relied in part on Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 3341.05, which authorized Kent State to confer degrees customarily conferred by colleges, and upon Ohio Rev.”
Fleming v. Kent State Univ., 2014-Ohio-3471, 17 N.E.3d 620. · cites it 2× “Fleming views the "reassignment" as an offer he never accepted. {¶ 16} In response, KSU argues for the first time it could not have breached the contract through the actions of Hazell or Kleinlein because, under R.”
Earp v. Kent State Univ., 2010-Ohio-5904. “See R.C. 3341.04. (“The board of trustees of * * * Kent state university * * * shall elect, fix the compensation of, and remove the president and such number of professors, teachers, and other employees as may be deemed necessary * * *.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.