Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 3715.83 (2026)

Dietary supplement considered to be adulterated

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In addition to the conditions specified in section 3715.59 of the Revised Code, a dietary supplement is adulterated if it presents a significant or unreasonable risk of illness or injury under the conditions of use recommended or suggested in its labeling or, if there are no recommended or suggested conditions of use, under the ordinary conditions of use.

If the director of agriculture finds or has cause to believe that a dietary supplement is adulterated under this section, the director shall proceed under the provisions of this chapter applicable to adulterated food. In any action taken under this section, the burden of proof shall be on the director.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2019–2019 · leading case: Stiner v. Amazon.com, Inc., 2019-Ohio-586, 120 N.E.3d 885.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Stiner v. Amazon.com, Inc., 2019-Ohio-586, 120 N.E.3d 885. · cites it 2× “64 regarding a misbranded drug; and count three, R.C. 3715.83, regarding adulterated supplements.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.