Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 3770.121 (2026)

Transfer of prize award paid in installments

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any state lottery commission rules allowing lottery prize awards to be paid in installments also shall allow a prize winner who is being paid a prize award in that manner to transfer the remainder of the prize award, subject to each of the following conditions:

(A) Payments of the prize award transferred shall be subject to the withholding or deduction of any amounts that are required to be withheld or deducted under section 3119.80, 3119.81, 3121.02, 3121.03, 3123.06, 3770.071, or 5747.062 of the Revised Code.

(B) Only one transfer is permitted under this section with respect to any single prize award unless a greater number of permitted transfers has been specified by the commission in the rules.

Last updated July 24, 2025 at 2:57 PM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2018–2018 · leading case: In re Acubens, L.L.C., 2018-Ohio-2607, 116 N.E.3d 793.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Acubens, L.L.C., 2018-Ohio-2607, 116 N.E.3d 793. · cites it 32× “Assignment of Error {¶ 8} Acubens appeals and assigns the following single assignment of error for our review: The Trial Court erred as a matter of law when it concluded that all transfers are subject to the restrictions contained in R.C. § 3770.121. III. Discussion {¶ 9} In its…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 3770.121(A): 1 case
In re Acubens, L.L.C., 2018-Ohio-2607, 116 N.E.3d 793. “Assignment of Error {¶ 8} Acubens appeals and assigns the following single assignment of error for our review: The Trial Court erred as a matter of law when it concluded that all transfers are subject to the restrictions contained in R.C. § 3770.121. III. Discussion {¶ 9} In its…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 3770.121(C): 1 case
In re Acubens, L.L.C., 2018-Ohio-2607, 116 N.E.3d 793. “Assignment of Error {¶ 8} Acubens appeals and assigns the following single assignment of error for our review: The Trial Court erred as a matter of law when it concluded that all transfers are subject to the restrictions contained in R.C. § 3770.121. III. Discussion {¶ 9} In its…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.