Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 3901.01 (2026)

Department of insurance

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

There is hereby created a department of insurance which shall have all powers and perform all duties formerly vested in and imposed upon the department of commerce and the superintendent of insurance.

In enacting sections 121.02, 121.03, 121.04, 121.05, 121.08, 121.081, 121.082, 3901.01, 3901.011, 3901.02, 3901.03, 3901.04, 3901.05, and 3901.051 of the Revised Code, it is the intent of the general assembly not to change the law as expressed by Title 39 of the Revised Code prior to September 9, 1957, except insofar as necessary to create a separate department of state government, known as the department of insurance, and to vest in it all the powers and impose upon it all the duties formerly vested in and imposed upon the department of commerce respecting the superintendent of insurance and any officers, deputies, or employees of the division of insurance, and except as otherwise expressly provided by such amendments to former law as are specifically adopted in such sections. All rules, regulations, and orders promulgated or issued by the superintendent of insurance prior to September 9, 1957 are continued and retained in full force and effect until amended, repealed, or revoked by the superintendent of insurance.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1991–2020 · leading case: State ex rel. Huntington Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Duryee, 653 N.E.2d 349 (Ohio 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Huntington Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Duryee, 653 N.E.2d 349 (Ohio 1995). “Independent contends that since the General Assembly has not specified standards regarding the alter-ego issue as it relates to licensure under R.C. 3901.01(B) and 3905.04, the holding by this court in Fabe unconstitutionally delegated legislative authority to the superintendent…”
George Fabe, Superintendent of Ins., State of Ohio v. United States Dep't of the Treasury Mitchell A. Levine, Assistant Comm'r, 939 F.2d 341 (6th Cir. 1991). “Ohio Rev.Code § 3901.01 et. seq. Chapter 3903 provides a comprehensive scheme for the orderly supervision, rehabilitation, and/or liquidation of Ohio insurance companies.”
Everson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Ohio, 898 F. Supp. 532 (N.D. Ohio 1994). “at § 3901.01; see also Struck v. Westfield Companies, 33 Ohio App.”
Katz v. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins., 685 F.3d 588 (6th Cir. 2012). “See Ohio Rev.Code § 3901.01 (creating department of insurance); id.”
Covington v. Univ. Hosp. of Cleveland, 778 N.E.2d 54 (Ohio Ct. App. 2002). “30, the setoff section, provides: “Mutual debts or mutual credits between the insurer and another person in connection with any action or proceeding under sections 3901.01 to 3903.59 of the Revised’ Code shall be set off and the balance only shall be allowed or paid, except as…”
Associated Gen. Contractors of Am. v. Columbus, 936 F. Supp. 1363 (S.D. Ohio 1996). “EBO Code § 3901.01(H). Under this scheme an M/FBE which has its place of business within the city limits of Columbus is entitled to the race- and gender-based benefits of the EBO Code without any inquiry into whether it suffered from the effects of past discrimination by the…”
State ex rel. Huntington Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Duryee, 1995 Ohio 337 (Ohio 1995). “Independent contends that since the General Assembly has not specified standards regarding the alter-ego issue as it relates to licensure under R.C. 3901.01(B) and 3905.04, the holding by this court in Fabe unconstitutionally delegated legislative authority to the superintendent…”
State ex rel. Infinity Secs., Inc. v. Froment, 2020 Ohio 5090 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “The Ohio Department of Insurance is a state agency created pursuant to R.C. 3901.01 whose powers are defined in the ensuing provisions.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3901.01(B) — 2 cases
State ex rel. Huntington Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Duryee, 653 N.E.2d 349 (Ohio 1995). “Independent contends that since the General Assembly has not specified standards regarding the alter-ego issue as it relates to licensure under R.C. 3901.01(B) and 3905.04, the holding by this court in Fabe unconstitutionally delegated legislative authority to the superintendent…”
State ex rel. Huntington Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Duryee, 1995 Ohio 337 (Ohio 1995). “Independent contends that since the General Assembly has not specified standards regarding the alter-ego issue as it relates to licensure under R.C. 3901.01(B) and 3905.04, the holding by this court in Fabe unconstitutionally delegated legislative authority to the superintendent…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3901.01(H) — 1 case
Associated Gen. Contractors of Am. v. Columbus, 936 F. Supp. 1363 (S.D. Ohio 1996). “EBO Code § 3901.01(H). Under this scheme an M/FBE which has its place of business within the city limits of Columbus is entitled to the race- and gender-based benefits of the EBO Code without any inquiry into whether it suffered from the effects of past discrimination by the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.