Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 3903.55 (2026)

Foreign claimants

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A) In a liquidation proceeding begun in this state against an insurer domiciled in this state, claimants residing in foreign countries or in states not reciprocal states must file claims in this state, and claimants residing in reciprocal states may file claims either with the ancillary receivers, if any, in their respective states, or with the domiciliary liquidator. Claims must be filed on or before the last date fixed for the filing of claims in the domiciliary liquidation proceeding.

(B) Claims belonging to claimants residing in reciprocal states may be proved either in the liquidation proceeding in this state as provided in sections 3903.01 to 3903.59 of the Revised Code, or in ancillary proceedings, if any, in the reciprocal states. If notice of the claims and opportunity to appear and be heard is afforded the domiciliary liquidator of this state as provided in division (B) of section 3903.56 of the Revised Code with respect to ancillary proceedings, the final allowance of claims by the courts in ancillary proceedings in reciprocal states shall be conclusive as to amount and as to priority against special deposits or other security located in such ancillary states, but shall not be conclusive with respect to priorities against assets under section 3903.42 of the Revised Code.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1987–1987 · leading case: State v. Ramos, 534 N.E.2d 885 (Ohio Ct. App. 3d Dist. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Ramos, 534 N.E.2d 885 (Ohio Ct. App. 3d Dist. 1987). “See, also, R.C. 3903.55. In regard to the liquidator’s evaluation of claims made against insurers in liquidation, the law of both states provides that the existence of judgments obtained after liquidation proceedings have begun is meaningless: “(d) The following do not need to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.