Notes of Decisions
Love v. Motorists Mut. Ins., 620 N.E.2d 987 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993).
· cites it 20× “R.C. 3937.32 provides: “No cancellation of an automobile insurance policy is effective, unless it is pursuant to written notice to the insured of cancellation.”
Clarke v. Smith, 690 N.E.2d 604 (Ohio Ct. App. 1997).
· cites it 9× “After hearing the evidence, the trial court held that Heritage did not send the Smiths proper notice of cancellation as required by R.C. 3937.32 and 3937.33. It also held that Heritage had waived its right to cancel the Smiths’ policy because it had established a practice of…”
Lewis v. Motorists Ins. Companies, 645 N.E.2d 784 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994).
· cites it 5× “The first conclusion was that the retroactive cancellation violated R.C. 3937.32 and 3937.33. The second conclusion was based upon the ambiguity of the cancellation date in the “Policy Change Request Form.”
Bauer v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co., 514 N.E.2d 913 (Ohio Ct. App. 1986).
· cites it 13× “R.C. 3937.32 provides for the mailing of a notice of cancellation prior to an effective cancelling of an insurance contract.”
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Ingle, 904 N.E.2d 934 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 2× “R.C. 3937.32. The *206 notice must include, among other things, the policy number, the date of the notice, and the effective date of the cancellation.”
Lococo v. Med. Sav. Ins. Co., 530 F.3d 442 (6th Cir. 2008).
“Pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code § 3937.32, the cancellation of automobile insurance is effective only upon written notification to the insured.”
Ohio Farmers Ins. v. Est. of Brace, 688 N.E.2d 298 (Ohio Ct. App. 1997).
· cites it 2× “appellees, to the prejudice of defendants-appellants, by failing to find that the ‘Automatic Termination’ provision of the insurance contract, which provided for cancellation of the policy immediately upon the insured obtaining other ‘similar’ insurance for the ‘covered auto,’…”
Turner v. Progressive Specialty Ins., 594 N.E.2d 986 (Ohio Ct. App. 1991).
· cites it 11× “The appellants have filed the following assignment as error: “The trial court erred to the prejudice of the appellants by holding that, as a matter of law, the requirements of R.C. 3937.32 are inapplicable in situations where a policy of automobile liability insurance is…”
Bigler v. Pers. Serv. Ins. Co., 2014 Ohio 1467 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
“33 (prior to effective date of cancellation, insurer shall tender any refund premium and other sums due). As the insurance company points out, these statutes do not apply to any policy or coverage that has been in effect less than 90 days at the time the notice of cancellation…”
DeBose v. Travelers Ins. Companies, 451 N.E.2d 753 (Ohio 1983).
“Indeed, the appellate court further found that even had such notice been tendered it did not comport with the statutory criteria enumerated in R.C. 3937.32.”
Hoskins v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 497 N.E.2d 87 (Ohio 1986).
“For a policy cancellation to be effective, R.C. 3937.32 requires the insurer to provide at least a ten-day written notice of cancellation where the reason for cancellation is nonpayment of a premium.”
Casto v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 594 N.E.2d 1004 (Ohio Ct. App. 1991).
“R.C. 3937.32(E), specifically applicable to cancellation for nonpayment of a premium, provides only that the cancellation must be “pursuant to a written notice.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3937.32(B) — 1 case
Love v. Motorists Mut. Ins., 620 N.E.2d 987 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993).
“R.C. 3937.32 provides: “No cancellation of an automobile insurance policy is effective, unless it is pursuant to written notice to the insured of cancellation.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3937.32(C) — 1 case
Bauer v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co., 514 N.E.2d 913 (Ohio Ct. App. 1986).
“R.C. 3937.32 provides for the mailing of a notice of cancellation prior to an effective cancelling of an insurance contract.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3937.32(D) — 1 case
Turner v. Progressive Specialty Ins., 594 N.E.2d 986 (Ohio Ct. App. 1991).
“The appellants have filed the following assignment as error: “The trial court erred to the prejudice of the appellants by holding that, as a matter of law, the requirements of R.C. 3937.32 are inapplicable in situations where a policy of automobile liability insurance is…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3937.32(E) — 6 cases
Love v. Motorists Mut. Ins., 620 N.E.2d 987 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993).
“R.C. 3937.32 provides: “No cancellation of an automobile insurance policy is effective, unless it is pursuant to written notice to the insured of cancellation.”
Bauer v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co., 514 N.E.2d 913 (Ohio Ct. App. 1986).
“R.C. 3937.32 provides for the mailing of a notice of cancellation prior to an effective cancelling of an insurance contract.”
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Ingle, 904 N.E.2d 934 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008).
“R.C. 3937.32. The *206 notice must include, among other things, the policy number, the date of the notice, and the effective date of the cancellation.”
Casto v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 594 N.E.2d 1004 (Ohio Ct. App. 1991).
“R.C. 3937.32(E), specifically applicable to cancellation for nonpayment of a premium, provides only that the cancellation must be “pursuant to a written notice.”
Clarke v. Smith, 690 N.E.2d 604 (Ohio Ct. App. 1997).
“After hearing the evidence, the trial court held that Heritage did not send the Smiths proper notice of cancellation as required by R.C. 3937.32 and 3937.33. It also held that Heritage had waived its right to cancel the Smiths’ policy because it had established a practice of…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3937.32(F) — 2 cases
Love v. Motorists Mut. Ins., 620 N.E.2d 987 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993).
“R.C. 3937.32 provides: “No cancellation of an automobile insurance policy is effective, unless it is pursuant to written notice to the insured of cancellation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.