Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 4115.071 (2026)

Prevailing wage coordinator

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A) Each contracting public authority that enters into a contract other than a contract for printing, binding, and related services, whose contractor and subcontractors are subject to sections 4115.03 to 4115.16 of the Revised Code shall, no later than ten days before the first payment of wages is payable to any employee of any contractor or subcontractor, designate and appoint one of its own employees to serve as the prevailing wage coordinator during the life of the contract. The duties of the coordinator shall include:

(1) Setting up and maintaining, available for public inspection including inspection by interested parties or affected employees, files of payroll reports and affidavits submitted by contractors and subcontractors pursuant to sections 4115.03 to 4115.16 of the Revised Code;

(2) Ascertaining from each contractor or subcontractor, at the beginning of performance under the contract, the dates during its life when payments of wages to employees are to be made;

(3) Receiving from each contractor or subcontractor, a copy of the contractor's or subcontractor's complete payroll for each date exhibiting for each employee paid any wages, the employee's name, current address, last four digits of the employee's social security number, number of hours worked each day during the pay period and the total for each week, the employee's hourly rate of pay, the employee's job classification, fringe payments, and deductions from the employee's wages;

(4) Establishing and following procedures to monitor the compliance by each contractor and subcontractor with the requirement imposed by this section for timely filing of copies of payroll records;

(5) Receiving from each contractor or subcontractor upon completion of the public improvement and prior to final payment therefor the affidavit required by section 4115.07 of the Revised Code;

(6) Reporting any delinquency in the filing of the certified copy of the payroll and the affidavit to the chief officer of the contracting public authority and the director of commerce.

(B) Any contracting public authority having a permanent employee with the title, powers, and functions described in division (A) of this section for the prevailing wage coordinator need not separately designate and appoint an employee for each public work contract entered into by the contracting public authority.

(C) Every contractor and subcontractor who is subject to sections 4115.03 to 4115.16 of the Revised Code shall, upon beginning performance under the contractor's or subcontractor's contract with any contracting public authority, supply to the prevailing wage coordinator of the contracting public authority a schedule of the dates during the life of the contract with the authority on which the contractor or subcontractor is required to pay wages to employees. The contractor or subcontractor shall also deliver to the prevailing wage coordinator a certified copy of the contractor's or subcontractor's payroll, within two weeks after the initial pay date, and supplemental reports for each month thereafter which shall exhibit for each employee paid any wages, the employee's name, current address, last four digits of the employee's social security number, number of hours worked during each day of the pay periods covered and the total for each week, the employee's hourly rate of pay, the employee's job classification, fringe payments, and deductions from the employee's wages. If the life of the contract is expected to be no more than four months from the beginning of performance by the contractor or subcontractor, such supplemental reports shall be filed each week after the initial report. The certification of each payroll shall be executed by the contractor, subcontractor, or duly appointed agent thereof and shall recite that the payroll is correct and complete and that the wage rates shown are not less than those required by the contract.

(D) If it is found that a public authority or prevailing wage coordinator has not complied with this section, the director shall give notice thereof in writing to the public authority or prevailing wage coordinator. Sufficient time shall be allowed for compliance as the director deems necessary. At the expiration of the time prescribed in the notice, the director shall, in writing, inform the attorney general of the fact that notice has been given and that the public authority or prevailing wage coordinator to whom it was directed has not complied with it. On receipt thereof, the attorney general shall bring suit in the name of the state in the court of common pleas of the county in which the public authority is located, to require the public authority or prevailing wage coordinator to comply with this section.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases, 1984–2014 · leading case: Vaughn Indus., Inc. v. Dimech Servs., 856 N.E.2d 312 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Vaughn Indus., Inc. v. Dimech Servs., 856 N.E.2d 312 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 7× “05 by allowing apprentices to work for it in excess of the allowable ratio of apprentices to skilled workers and violated R.C. 4115.071 by failing to prepare certified payroll reports in accordance with the regulations of the Ohio Administrative Code.”
Pruneau v. Dep't of Com., Bureau of Wage & Hour, 191 Ohio App. 3d 588 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 6× “13(H)(1) by knowingly submitting false or erroneous reports certifying that fringe benefits had been paid when they had not been.”
State v. Buckeye Elec. Co., 466 N.E.2d 894 (Ohio 1984). · cites it 4× ““(B) Whoever violates division (C) of section 4115.071, section 4115.10, or 4115.”
Ohio Valley Associated Bldrs. & Contrs. v. Rapier Elec., Inc., 2014 Ohio 1477 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “07 by failing to retain full and accurate payroll records for a period of one year following the completion of the various construction projects, as well as certifying the payroll reports without actually reading them in violation of R.C. 4115.071. OVABC also argues that "Rapier…”
Int'l Ass'n of Bridge Workers, Local 372 v. Sunesis Constr. Co., 917 N.E.2d 343 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 3× “6 {¶ 18} Specifically, Local 372 contends that R.C. 4115.071 requires contractors to itemize all fringe benefits and list all permitted deductions.”
Harris v. Davis Constr. Sys., Inc., 518 N.E.2d 956 (Ohio Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 4× “Further, Davis Construction alleges that Eastland did not designate a wage coordinator as required by R.C. 4115.071. None of the above statutory provisions provides that a private contractor may institute a civil suit against a public authority.”
Tiemann v. Univ. of Cincinnati, 712 N.E.2d 1258 (Ohio Ct. App. 1998). “14 provides for a suit by the Attorney General to either prevent the letting of a contract or the performance of an executed contract until the public authority complies with the provisions of R.”
Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers v. Vaughn Indus., Inc., 156 Ohio App. 3d 644 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 3× “07 by posting, in a prominent and accessible place on the work site, a legible statement of the schedule of wage rates specified in the contract for various classifications of laborers, workers, and mechanics; (5) to prepare certified payroll reports enumerating each employee’s…”
Robbins Sound, Inc. v. Ohio Univ., 590 N.E.2d 877 (Ohio Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 3× “Moreover, to the extent Honeywell failed to provide the monthly payroll reports required by R.C. 4115.071(C), plaintiff could have enjoined further work on the project until Honeywell and Ohio University complied with this section.”
Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, Local Union No. 8 v. Stollsteimer Elec., Inc., 859 N.E.2d 590 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006). “{¶ 19} The statute further provides, however, that upon finding that a violation has occurred, the court shall afford to injured persons the relief specified in R.”
United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., Local Union No. 1581 v. Fitzenrider, 2012 Ohio 4653 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 7× “age schedule of wage rates; that Fitzenrider failed to establish that any of its fringe benefit funds, plans and programs were legitimate, and failed to substantiate any payments made to its fringe benefit programs; that Fitzenrider unlawfully calculated its fringe benefit…”
United Assn. of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Indus., Local Union No. 776 v. Jack's Heating, Air Conditioning, & Plumbing, 2011 Ohio 167 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “4101:9-4-13 by failing to deliver a schedule of its pay rates to the public authority; (6) R.C. 4115.071(C) -3- Case No. 6-10-11 and O.”
Show all 15 citing cases →
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4115.071(C) — 9 cases
Vaughn Indus., Inc. v. Dimech Servs., 856 N.E.2d 312 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006). “05 by allowing apprentices to work for it in excess of the allowable ratio of apprentices to skilled workers and violated R.C. 4115.071 by failing to prepare certified payroll reports in accordance with the regulations of the Ohio Administrative Code.”
Pruneau v. Dep't of Com., Bureau of Wage & Hour, 191 Ohio App. 3d 588 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010). “13(H)(1) by knowingly submitting false or erroneous reports certifying that fringe benefits had been paid when they had not been.”
Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers v. Vaughn Indus., Inc., 156 Ohio App. 3d 644 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004). “07 by posting, in a prominent and accessible place on the work site, a legible statement of the schedule of wage rates specified in the contract for various classifications of laborers, workers, and mechanics; (5) to prepare certified payroll reports enumerating each employee’s…”
Ohio Valley Associated Bldrs. & Contrs. v. Rapier Elec., Inc., 2014 Ohio 1477 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “07 by failing to retain full and accurate payroll records for a period of one year following the completion of the various construction projects, as well as certifying the payroll reports without actually reading them in violation of R.C. 4115.071. OVABC also argues that "Rapier…”
United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., Local Union No. 1581 v. Fitzenrider, 2012 Ohio 4653 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012). “age schedule of wage rates; that Fitzenrider failed to establish that any of its fringe benefit funds, plans and programs were legitimate, and failed to substantiate any payments made to its fringe benefit programs; that Fitzenrider unlawfully calculated its fringe benefit…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4115.071(D) — 3 cases
Tiemann v. Univ. of Cincinnati, 712 N.E.2d 1258 (Ohio Ct. App. 1998). “14 provides for a suit by the Attorney General to either prevent the letting of a contract or the performance of an executed contract until the public authority complies with the provisions of R.”
Robbins Sound, Inc. v. Ohio Univ., 590 N.E.2d 877 (Ohio Ct. App. 1990). “Moreover, to the extent Honeywell failed to provide the monthly payroll reports required by R.C. 4115.071(C), plaintiff could have enjoined further work on the project until Honeywell and Ohio University complied with this section.”
Harris v. Davis Constr. Sys., Inc., 518 N.E.2d 956 (Ohio Ct. App. 1986). “Further, Davis Construction alleges that Eastland did not designate a wage coordinator as required by R.C. 4115.071. None of the above statutory provisions provides that a private contractor may institute a civil suit against a public authority.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.