Employers who comply with section 4123.35 of the Revised Code shall not be liable to respond in damages at common law or by statute for any injury, or occupational disease, or bodily condition, received or contracted by any employee in the course of or arising out of his employment, or for any death resulting from such injury, occupational disease, or bodily condition occurring during the period covered by such premium so paid into the state insurance fund, or during the interval the employer is a self-insuring employer, whether or not such injury, occupational disease, bodily condition, or death is compensable under this chapter.
Kaminski v. Metal & Wire Prods. Co., 2010 Ohio 1027 (Ohio 2010). · cites it 18ד1465-70 was later recodified as R.C. 4123.74. Id. 2. {¶ a} In Van Fossen, 36 Ohio St.”
Stolz v. J & B Steel Erectors, Inc. (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 1567 (Ohio 2016). · cites it 15דR.C. 4123.74. 4 January Term, 2016 {¶ 12} Ohio’s workers’ compensation law contains a special carve-out for “self-insuring employers,” who do not pay into the state insurance fund.”
Brady v. Saf.-Kleen Corp., 576 N.E.2d 722 (Ohio 1991). · cites it 12דIn apparent response to such decisions, the Workers’ Compensation Act was amended in 1959, and R.C. 4123.74 (128 Ohio Laws 1334) was enacted which provided in relevant part: “Employers who comply with section 4123.”
Kerans v. Porter Paint Co., 575 N.E.2d 428 (Ohio 1991). · cites it 12דWe must first address appellee’s contention that the appellants’ claims are barred by R.C. 4123.74. R.C. 4123.74 provided, in pertinent part, “Employers who comply with section 4123.”
Jones v. VIP Dev. Co., 472 N.E.2d 1046 (Ohio 1984). · cites it 7דOur task today is to examine the concept of intent for purposes of clarifying what constitutes an intentional tort.”
Russell v. Interim Pers., Inc., 733 N.E.2d 1186 (Ohio Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 6דR.C. 4123.74. Appellant, citing Bridges v.”
Egan v. Nat'l Distillers & Chem. Corp., 495 N.E.2d 904 (Ohio 1986). · cites it 8ד12(B)(6), and cited R.C. 4123.74, 4Í23.741 and Section 35, Article II of the Ohio Constitution as authority.”
King v. Buildtech Ltd. Constr. Dev., 2023 Ohio 1092 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 15דThe court found that R.C. 4123.74 immunized Buildtech from liability on King’s negligence claim because Buildtech, as Manpower’s customer who leased King’s services, was considered King’s employer for workers’ compensation purposes.”
Balyint v. Arkansas Best Freight Sys., Inc., 480 N.E.2d 417 (Ohio 1985). · cites it 9דCincinnati Milacron Chemicals, supra, in the syllabus: *129 “An employee is not precluded by Section 35, Article II of the Ohio Constitution, or by R.C. 4123.74 and 4123.741 from enforcing his common law remedies against his employer for an intentional tort.”
Bunger v. Lawson Co., 696 N.E.2d 1029 (Ohio 1998). · cites it 7דR.C. 4123.74 reads: “Employers who comply with section 4123.”
Maynard v. H.A.M. Landscaping, Inc., 849 N.E.2d 77 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 11דThe employer reasoned that it was in compliance with R.C. 4123.74 and is therefore *80 immune from liability for negligence.”
Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co., 522 N.E.2d 489 (Ohio 1988). · cites it 2ד1465-70 was later recodified as R.C. 4123.74 and contained the same provisions until amended by Am.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.