(A) Except as provided in this section and sections 4141.162 and 4141.211 of the Revised Code, and subject to section 4141.43 of the Revised Code, the information maintained by the director of job and family services or the unemployment compensation review commission or furnished to the director or commission by employers or employees pursuant to this chapter is for the exclusive use and information of the department of job and family services and the commission in the discharge of their duties and shall not be disclosed. Such information is not a public record under section 149.43 of the Revised Code.
(B) Information protected from disclosure under division (A) of this section may be tabulated and published in statistical form for the use and information of the state departments and the public.
Last updated August 23, 2023 at 1:22 PM
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1975–2021 · leading case: Barilla v. Patella, 760 N.E.2d 898 (Ohio Ct. App. 2001).
Barilla v. Patella, 760 N.E.2d 898 (Ohio Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 13ד3d 262 ; R.C. 4141.21; see, also, Horsley v. Wal-Mart, Inc.”
Freed v. Grand Court Lifestyles, Inc., 100 F. Supp. 2d 610 (S.D. Ohio 1998). · cites it 17דThe Administrator contends that certain files and records subpoenaed by the Defendant are protected from disclosure by a statutory privilege found in Ohio Rev.Code § 4141.21. I. Factual and Procedural Background Joanne Freed filed a Complaint against Grand Court Lifestyles, Inc.”
Large v. Heartland-Lansing of Bridgeport Ohio, L.L.C., 2013 Ohio 2877 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 4ד02(E)(1), the Ninth and Tenth District Courts of Appeals have interpreted this exact language, which also appears in R.C. 4141.21. On review of R.C. 4141.21, these districts have held that the language “does not confer a privilege; rather, it contains an evidence exclusion…”
Russo v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 521 N.E.2d 1116 (Ohio Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2ד, and R.C. 4141.21. On September 9, 1985, the trial court vacated its *177 protective order and then ordered the plaintiffs to comply with discovery, stating, in part: “The amount of TRA benefits received by each class member is needed to determine the amount of Defendants’…”
Klaus v. Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. of Ohio, 437 F. Supp. 2d 706 (S.D. Ohio 2006). · cites it 2דOhio Revised Code § 4141.21 provides as follows: ... “[T]he information maintained by the director of job and family services or furnished to the director by employers or employees pursuant to this chapter is for the exclusive use and information of the department of job and…”
Coon v. Tech. Constr. Specialties, Inc., Unpublished Decision (8-10-2005), 2005 Ohio 4080 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005). “Assignment of Error Number One "The trial court erred to the prejudice of [specialties] when it permitted admission of documents submitted to the unemployment compensation review commission in violation of the absolute privilege contained in R.C. 4141.21." Assignment of Error…”
City of Findlay v. Coy, 601 N.E.2d 186 (Ohio Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 7דIn his first assignment, defendant argues that the trial court erroneously permitted the city of Findlay and the Ohio Bureau of Employment Services (“OBES”) to use application forms and other information, supplied to the bureau by defendant as a benefits claimant, against him in…”
Ohio Civil Rights Comm'n v. Campbell, 345 N.E.2d 438 (Ohio Ct. App. 1975). · cites it 2דThe Court below erroneously interpreted the privilege contained in Revised Code §4141.21 to bar enforcement of a lawful Commission Subpoena.”
House v. Iacovelli, 2018 Ohio 443 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR II THE TRIAL COURT ERRED TO THE PREJUDICE OF THE APPELLANT BY GRANTING A MOTION TO QUASH A SUBPOENA SEEKING UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION RECORDS RELATING TO THE APPELLEE'S EMPLOYMENT OF THE APPELLANT AND BY FINDING IN EFFECT OHIO R.C. 4141.21 IS…”
Senco Brands, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Fam. Servs., 2016 Ohio 4769 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2ד) {¶ 54} R.C. 4141.21 protects the confidentiality of information collected and held by ODJFS, in relevant part, as follows: [T]he information maintained by the director of job and family services or furnished to the director by employers or employees pursuant to this chapter is…”
Wiggins v. Ohio Bureau of Emp. Servs., 610 N.E.2d 1150 (Ohio Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 4דIn response to appellant’s argument that the transcript must be disclosed, appellee directs our attention to R.C. 4141.21, which provides, in material part, that: “Except as provided for in [sections of R.”
Weckbacher v. Mem'l Heatlh Sys. Marietta Mem'l Hosp. (S.D. Ohio 2019). · cites it 6דservices in the discharge of its duties and shall not be open to the public or be used in any court in any action or proceeding pending therein, or be admissible in evidence in any action, other than one arising under this chapter or section 5733.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.