Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 4509
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 4509.02 (2026)

Judgment, state definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
January 1, 2004
Latest Legislation:
Senate Bill 123 - 124th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

As used in sections 4509.291 to 4509.67 of the Revised Code:

(A) "Judgment" means any judgment which has become final by expiration without appeal of the time within which an appeal might have been perfected, or by final affirmation on appeal, rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction of any state or of the United States, upon a cause of action arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of any motor vehicle for damages, including damages for care and loss of services because of bodily injury to or death of any person, or for damages because of injury to or destruction of property, including the loss of use thereof, or upon a cause of action on an agreement of settlement for such damages.

(B) "State" means any state, territory, or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any province of the Dominion of Canada.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1966–1990 · leading case: City of Toledo v. Bernoir, 247 N.E.2d 740 (Ohio 1969).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Toledo v. Bernoir, 247 N.E.2d 740 (Ohio 1969). · cites it 2× “) Section 4509.02 (A), Revised Code, states that “ ‘Judgment’ means any judgment .”
Kerns v. Ohio Dep't of High. Saf., 587 N.E.2d 930 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 1990). · cites it 3× “On May 9, 1989, the court found that the judgment of October 16,1985 was based upon breach of contract and did not fall within the *172 definition or purpose of R.C. 4509.02(A), since the judgment had no relationship to Kerns’s ownership or operation of a motor vehicle.”
State v. Munzberg, 215 N.E.2d 605 (Ohio Ct. App. 1966). · cites it 4× “* # # j Section 4509.02, Revised Code, says in part: “As used in Sections 4509.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4509.02(A): 2 cases
Kerns v. Ohio Dep't of High. Saf., 587 N.E.2d 930 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 1990). “On May 9, 1989, the court found that the judgment of October 16,1985 was based upon breach of contract and did not fall within the *172 definition or purpose of R.C. 4509.02(A), since the judgment had no relationship to Kerns’s ownership or operation of a motor vehicle.”
State v. Munzberg, 215 N.E.2d 605 (Ohio Ct. App. 1966). “* # # j Section 4509.02, Revised Code, says in part: “As used in Sections 4509.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.