Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 4511.204 (2026)

Driving while texting

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A) No person shall operate a motor vehicle, trackless trolley, or streetcar on any street, highway, or property open to the public for vehicular traffic while using, holding, or physically supporting with any part of the person's body an electronic wireless communications device.

(B) Division (A) of this section does not apply to any of the following:

(1) A person using an electronic wireless communications device to make contact, for emergency purposes, with a law enforcement agency, hospital or health care provider, fire department, or other similar emergency agency or entity;

(2) A person driving a public safety vehicle while using an electronic wireless communications device in the course of the person's duties;

(3) A person using an electronic wireless communications device when the person's motor vehicle is in a stationary position and is outside a lane of travel, at a highway traffic signal that is currently directing traffic to stop, or parked on a road or highway due to an emergency or road closure;

(4) A person using and holding an electronic wireless communications device directly near the person's ear for the purpose of making, receiving, or conducting a telephone call, provided that the person does not manually enter letters, numbers, or symbols into the device;

(5) A person receiving wireless messages on an electronic wireless communications device regarding the operation or navigation of a motor vehicle; safety-related information, including emergency, traffic, or weather alerts; or data used primarily by the motor vehicle, provided that the person does not hold or support the device with any part of the person's body;

(6) A person using the speaker phone function of the electronic wireless communications device, provided that the person does not hold or support the device with any part of the person's body;

(7) A person using an electronic wireless communications device for navigation purposes, provided that the person does not do either of the following during the use:

(a) Manually enter letters, numbers, or symbols into the device;

(b) Hold or support the device with any part of the person's body.

(8) A person using a feature or function of the electronic wireless communications device with a single touch or single swipe, provided that the person does not do either of the following during the use:

(a) Manually enter letters, numbers, or symbols into the device;

(b) Hold or support the device with any part of the person's body.

(9) A person operating a commercial truck while using a mobile data terminal that transmits and receives data;

(10) A person operating a utility service vehicle or a vehicle for or on behalf of a utility, if the person is acting in response to an emergency, power outage, or circumstance that affects the health or safety of individuals;

(11) A person using an electronic wireless communications device in conjunction with a voice-operated or hands-free feature or function of the vehicle or of the device without the use of either hand except to activate, deactivate, or initiate the feature or function with a single touch or swipe, provided the person does not hold or support the device with any part of the person's body;

(12) A person using technology that physically or electronically integrates the device into the motor vehicle, provided that the person does not do either of the following during the use:

(a) Manually enter letters, numbers, or symbols into the device;

(b) Hold or support the device with any part of the person's body.

(13) A person storing an electronic wireless communications device in a holster, harness, or article of clothing on the person's body.

(C)(1) On January 31 of each year, the department of public safety shall issue a report to the general assembly that specifies the number of citations issued for violations of this section during the previous calendar year.

(2) If a law enforcement officer issues an offender a ticket, citation, or summons for a violation of division (A) of this section, the officer shall do both of the following:

(a) Report the issuance of the ticket, citation, or summons to the officer's law enforcement agency;

(b) Ensure that such report indicates the offender's race.

(D) Whoever violates division (A) of this section is guilty of operating a motor vehicle while using an electronic wireless communication device, an unclassified misdemeanor, and shall be punished as provided in divisions (D)(1) to (5) of this section.

(1) The offender shall be fined, and is subject to a suspension of the offender's driver's license, commercial driver's license, temporary instruction permit, probationary license, or nonresident operating privilege, as follows:

(a) Except as provided in divisions (D)(1)(b), (c), (d), and (2) of this section, the court shall impose upon the offender a fine of not more than one hundred fifty dollars.

(b) If, within two years of the violation, the offender has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to one prior violation of this section or a substantially equivalent municipal ordinance, the court shall impose upon the offender a fine of not more than two hundred fifty dollars.

(c) If, within two years of the violation, the offender has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to two or more prior violations of this section or a substantially equivalent municipal ordinance, the court shall impose upon the offender a fine of not more than five hundred dollars. The court also may impose a suspension of the offender's driver's license, commercial driver's license, temporary instruction permit, probationary license, or nonresident operating privilege for ninety days.

(d) Notwithstanding divisions (D)(1)(a) to (c) of this section, if the offender was operating the motor vehicle at the time of the violation in a construction zone where a sign was posted in accordance with section 4511.98 of the Revised Code, the court, in addition to all other penalties provided by law, shall impose upon the offender a fine of two times the amount imposed for the violation under division (D)(1)(a), (b), or (c) of this section, as applicable.

(2) If the offender is in the category of offenders to whom division (D)(1)(a) of this section applies, in lieu of payment of the fine of one hundred fifty dollars under division (D)(1)(a) of this section and the assessment of points under division (D)(4) of this section, the offender instead may elect to attend the distracted driving safety course, as described in section 4511.991 of the Revised Code. If the offender attends and successfully completes the course, the offender shall be issued written evidence that the offender successfully completed the course. The offender shall not be required to pay the fine and shall not have the points assessed against that offender's driver's license if the offender submits the written evidence to the court within 90 days of the violation of division (A) of this section. However, successful completion of the course does not result in a dismissal of the charges for the violation, and the violation is a prior offense under divisions (D)(1)(b) and (c) of this section if the offender commits a subsequent violation or violations of division (A) of this section within two years of the offense for which the course was completed. This division does not apply with respect to any offender in the category of offenders to whom division (D)(1)(b), (c), or (d) of this section applies.

(3) The court may impose any other penalty authorized under sections 2929.21 to 2929.28 of the Revised Code. However, the court shall not impose a fine or a suspension not otherwise specified in division (D)(1) of this section. The court also shall not impose a jail term or community residential sanction.

(4) Except as provided in division (D)(2) of this section, points shall be assessed for a violation of division (A) of this section in accordance with section 4510.036 of the Revised Code.

(5) The offense established under this section is a strict liability offense and section 2901.20 of the Revised Code does not apply. The designation of this offense as a strict liability offense shall not be construed to imply that any other offense, for which there is no specified degree of culpability, is not a strict liability offense.

(E) This section shall not be construed as invalidating, preempting, or superseding a substantially equivalent municipal ordinance that prescribes penalties for violations of that ordinance that are greater than the penalties prescribed in this section for violations of this section.

(F) A prosecution for an offense in violation of this section does not preclude a prosecution for an offense in violation of a substantially equivalent municipal ordinance based on the same conduct. However, the two offenses are allied offenses of similar import under section 2941.25 of the Revised Code.

(G)(1) A law enforcement officer does not have probable cause and shall not stop the operator of a motor vehicle for purposes of enforcing this section unless the officer visually observes the operator using, holding, or physically supporting with any part of the person's body the electronic wireless communications device.

(2) A law enforcement officer who stops the operator of a motor vehicle, trackless trolley, or streetcar for a violation of division (A) of this section shall inform the operator that the operator may decline a search of the operator's electronic wireless communications device. The officer shall not do any of the following:

(a) Access the device without a warrant, unless the operator voluntarily and unequivocally gives consent for the officer to access the device;

(b) Confiscate the device while awaiting the issuance of a warrant to access the device;

(c) Obtain consent from the operator to access the device through coercion or any other improper means. Any consent by the operator to access the device shall be voluntary and unequivocal before the officer may access the device without a warrant.

(H) As used in this section:

(1) "Electronic wireless communications device" includes any of the following:

(a) A wireless telephone;

(b) A text-messaging device;

(c) A personal digital assistant;

(d) A computer, including a laptop computer and a computer tablet;

(e) Any device capable of displaying a video, movie, broadcast television image, or visual image;

(f) Any other substantially similar wireless device that is designed or used to communicate text, initiate or receive communication, or exchange information or data.

An "electronic wireless communications device" does not include a two-way radio transmitter or receiver used by a person who is licensed by the federal communications commission to participate in the amateur radio service.

(2) "Voice-operated or hands-free feature or function" means a feature or function that allows a person to use an electronic wireless communications device without the use of either hand, except to activate, deactivate, or initiate the feature or function with a single touch or single swipe.

(3) "Utility" means an entity specified in division (A), (C), (D), (E), or (G) of section 4905.03 of the Revised Code.

(4) "Utility service vehicle" means a vehicle owned or operated by a utility.

Last updated April 30, 2025 at 10:50 AM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2014–2026 · leading case: State v. Havens, 2024 Ohio 2204 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Havens, 2024 Ohio 2204 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 8× “FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY {¶ 2} On October 22, 2023, Havens was cited for texting while driving in violation of R.C. 4511.204. A bench trial commenced on November 15, 2023.”
Columbus v. Catudal, 2019 Ohio 1137 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 5× “44(b) conflicts with R.C. 4511.204, which reads: (A) No person shall drive a motor vehicle, trackless trolley, or streetcar on any street, highway, or property open to the public for vehicular traffic while using a handheld electronic wireless communications device to write,…”
State v. Lundeen, 2026 Ohio 1925 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 25× “{¶1} Defendant-appellant, James Lundeen (“Lundeen”), appeals the judgment of conviction and sentence entered against him in the Crawford County Municipal Court, following a bench trial in which Lundeen was found guilty of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Using an Electronic…”
Linndale v. State, 2014 Ohio 4024 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 3× “14AP-21 2 under the Ohio Constitution because it incorporated amendments to R.C. 4511.204 and 4511.205 regarding the use of handheld electronic communications devices while driving, we reverse.”
Springfield v. State, 2016 Ohio 725 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “010, and R.C. 4511.204(C)(2). According to Springfield, the remainder of Am.”
State v. Taylor, 2024 Ohio 5956 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 8× “{¶1} Defendant-appellant Michael Taylor appeals the judgment entered by the Mansfield Municipal Court convicting him following a bench trial of operating a motor vehicle while using an electronic wireless communication device (R.C. 4511.204) and fining him $25.00.…”
State v. Scarberry, 2025 Ohio 933 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 5× “One of those exceptions, relevant here, excludes from culpability “[a] person using and holding an electronic wireless communications device directly near the person’s ear for the purpose of making, receiving, or conducting a telephone call, provided that the person does not…”
State v. Al-Murshidy, 2025 Ohio 3302 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 5× “{¶ 1} Appellant, Mohammed Al-Murshidy, appeals the August 28, 2024 judgment of the Bowling Green Municipal Court finding him guilty of operating a motor vehicle while using an electronic wireless communication device in violation of R.C. 4511.204. Because we find that this case…”
State v. Smith, 2026 Ohio 806 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 4× “The appellant was cited for prohibited use of an electronic device while driving in violation of R.C. 4511.204. The appellant, through counsel, entered a general plea of not guilty, and the matter was set for trial.”
State v. Kiriakou, 2014 Ohio 4056 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “See, R.C. 4511.204, texting while driving prohibited; R.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4511.204(A): 1 case
State v. Scarberry, 2025 Ohio 933 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). “One of those exceptions, relevant here, excludes from culpability “[a] person using and holding an electronic wireless communications device directly near the person’s ear for the purpose of making, receiving, or conducting a telephone call, provided that the person does not…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4511.204(B): 2 cases
State v. Havens, 2024 Ohio 2204 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY {¶ 2} On October 22, 2023, Havens was cited for texting while driving in violation of R.C. 4511.204. A bench trial commenced on November 15, 2023.”
State v. Scarberry, 2025 Ohio 933 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). “One of those exceptions, relevant here, excludes from culpability “[a] person using and holding an electronic wireless communications device directly near the person’s ear for the purpose of making, receiving, or conducting a telephone call, provided that the person does not…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4511.204(B)(1): 1 case
State v. Taylor, 2024 Ohio 5956 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “{¶1} Defendant-appellant Michael Taylor appeals the judgment entered by the Mansfield Municipal Court convicting him following a bench trial of operating a motor vehicle while using an electronic wireless communication device (R.C. 4511.204) and fining him $25.00.…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4511.204(B)(2): 1 case
State v. Taylor, 2024 Ohio 5956 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “{¶1} Defendant-appellant Michael Taylor appeals the judgment entered by the Mansfield Municipal Court convicting him following a bench trial of operating a motor vehicle while using an electronic wireless communication device (R.C. 4511.204) and fining him $25.00.…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4511.204(B)(4): 2 cases
State v. Lundeen, 2026 Ohio 1925 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026). “{¶1} Defendant-appellant, James Lundeen (“Lundeen”), appeals the judgment of conviction and sentence entered against him in the Crawford County Municipal Court, following a bench trial in which Lundeen was found guilty of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Using an Electronic…”
State v. Scarberry, 2025 Ohio 933 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). “One of those exceptions, relevant here, excludes from culpability “[a] person using and holding an electronic wireless communications device directly near the person’s ear for the purpose of making, receiving, or conducting a telephone call, provided that the person does not…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4511.204(B)(6): 1 case
State v. Scarberry, 2025 Ohio 933 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). “One of those exceptions, relevant here, excludes from culpability “[a] person using and holding an electronic wireless communications device directly near the person’s ear for the purpose of making, receiving, or conducting a telephone call, provided that the person does not…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4511.204(C): 1 case
Columbus v. Catudal, 2019 Ohio 1137 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “44(b) conflicts with R.C. 4511.204, which reads: (A) No person shall drive a motor vehicle, trackless trolley, or streetcar on any street, highway, or property open to the public for vehicular traffic while using a handheld electronic wireless communications device to write,…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4511.204(C)(1): 1 case
Columbus v. Catudal, 2019 Ohio 1137 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “44(b) conflicts with R.C. 4511.204, which reads: (A) No person shall drive a motor vehicle, trackless trolley, or streetcar on any street, highway, or property open to the public for vehicular traffic while using a handheld electronic wireless communications device to write,…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4511.204(C)(2): 1 case
Springfield v. State, 2016 Ohio 725 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “010, and R.C. 4511.204(C)(2). According to Springfield, the remainder of Am.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4511.204(D): 1 case
State v. Lundeen, 2026 Ohio 1925 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026). “{¶1} Defendant-appellant, James Lundeen (“Lundeen”), appeals the judgment of conviction and sentence entered against him in the Crawford County Municipal Court, following a bench trial in which Lundeen was found guilty of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Using an Electronic…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4511.204(D)(1)(b): 1 case
State v. Al-Murshidy, 2025 Ohio 3302 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). “{¶ 1} Appellant, Mohammed Al-Murshidy, appeals the August 28, 2024 judgment of the Bowling Green Municipal Court finding him guilty of operating a motor vehicle while using an electronic wireless communication device in violation of R.C. 4511.204. Because we find that this case…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.