Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 4905
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 4905.32 (2026)

Schedule rate collected

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
October 1, 1953
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 1 - 100th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

No public utility shall charge, demand, exact, receive, or collect a different rate, rental, toll, or charge for any service rendered, or to be rendered, than that applicable to such service as specified in its schedule filed with the public utilities commission which is in effect at the time.

No public utility shall refund or remit directly or indirectly, any rate, rental, toll, or charge so specified, or any part thereof, or extend to any person, firm, or corporation, any rule, regulation, privilege, or facility except such as are specified in such schedule and regularly and uniformly extended to all persons, firms, and corporations under like circumstances for like, or substantially similar, service.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1957–2022 · leading case: In re Review of the Alt. Energy Rider Contained in the Tariffs of Ohio Edison Co., 106 N.E.3d 1 (Ohio 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Review of the Alt. Energy Rider Contained in the Tariffs of Ohio Edison Co., 106 N.E.3d 1 (Ohio 2018). · cites it 30× “1 : Whether the commission engaged in unlawful retroactive ratemaking {¶ 15} FirstEnergy argues under its first proposition of law that the commission engaged in unlawful retroactive ratemaking when it ordered FirstEnergy to refund more than $43 million in REC costs.…”
In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co., 2014 Ohio 462 (Ohio 2014). · cites it 4× “23 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO {¶ 63} R.C. 4905.32, the statute on which the Keco decision is based, does not state that there is “no right of action for restitution of the increase in charges collected during the pendency of the appeal.”
Allnet Commc'ns Servs., Inc. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 70 Ohio St. 3d 202 (Ohio 1994). · cites it 7× “26, and in violation of R.C. 4905.32, 4905.33, and 4905.35. We disagree.”
Williams v. Duke Energy Int'l, Inc., 606 F. Supp. 2d 783 (S.D. Ohio 2009). · cites it 14× “It is true, as Plaintiffs contend, that O.R.C. § 4905.32, a specific statute prohibiting the collection of other than the filed rate, no longer applies to market-based electric utilities.”
Ohio Consumers' Couns. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 111 Ohio St. 3d 300 (Ohio 2006). · cites it 2× “4 {¶ 57} In the fourth proposition of law, OCC contends that the commission’s order and first entry on rehearing approving CG & E’s rate-stabilization plan permit discriminatory treatment of customers in violation of R.C. 4905.32 through *314 4905.35. OCC argues that the…”
In re Complaint of Reynoldsburg, 2012 Ohio 5270 (Ohio 2012). “” And R.C. 4905.32 states: “No public utility shall charge, demand, exact, receive, or collect a different rate * * * or charge for any service rendered, or to be rendered, than that applicable to such service as specified in its schedule filed with the public utilities…”
In re Fuel Adjustment Clauses for Columbus S. Power Co. & Ohio Power Co. (Slip Opinion), 2014 Ohio 3764 (Ohio 2014). “Nor has Ohio Power demonstrated that the commission’s decision to apply proceeds from the 2008 settlement agreement against 2009 fuel costs was unreasonable.”
In re Complaint of Pilkington N. Am., Inc. (Slip Opinion), 2015 Ohio 4797 (Ohio 2015). “See R.C. 4905.32; Keco Industries, Inc. v. Cincinnati & Suburban Bell Tel.”
Cincinnati Gas & Elec. Co. v. Joseph Chevrolet Co., 791 N.E.2d 1016 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003). “R.C. 4905.32. 20 . R.C. 4509.32 and 4509.”
In re Application of Ohio Edison Co. (Slip Opinion), 2019 Ohio 2401 (Ohio 2019). “Ostensibly, FirstEnergy would forfeit the DMR if it failed to comply with any of the conditions.”
Columbus S. Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 620 N.E.2d 835 (Ohio 1993). “See R.C. 4905.32. Here, Industrial Electric Consumers et al.”
Lucas Cnty. Commissioners v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 686 N.E.2d 501 (Ohio 1997). “R.C. 4905.32. Pursuant to R.C. 4905.26 and 4909.”
Show all 25 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.