In a township in which there is a municipal corporation, the legislative authority of which has already levied a tax for hospital purposes, the board of township trustees may make such levy only on the taxable property of the township outside of the limits of such municipal corporation.
Last updated March 23, 2022 at 3:17 PM
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1983–2012 · leading case: City of Medina v. Szwec, 809 N.E.2d 78 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 2004).
City of Medina v. Szwec, 809 N.E.2d 78 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 2004). · cites it 16ד” {¶ 3} In its sole assignment of error, the city asserts that the trial court erroneously concluded that Section 513.03 was in conflict with R.C. 2925.”
City of Niles v. Howard, 466 N.E.2d 539 (Ohio 1984). · cites it 4ד) If the city were correct in asserting that the drug laws are not general laws, then Section 513.03 3 would not be unconstitutional.”
City of Cleveland Heights v. Perryman, 457 N.E.2d 926 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1983). · cites it 4ד01(A), and “possession of marijuana” in violation of Municipal Code Section 513.03(A). After a one-day recess to consider these motions, the trial court sent counsel notice that the city’s motion to amend was sustained, defendant’s motion to dismiss was overruled, and the case…”
State v. Glasser, 2012-Ohio-3265. · cites it 2ד) 3 Weinstein & Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, Section 513.03 (2d Ed.2007). “If objection to the disclosure of a confidential communication must be made in the presence of the jury * * * the benefit of the privilege is largely lost, because the claim of privilege is…”
State v. Clark, 2012-Ohio-2058. · cites it 2דAccording to Carpenter, Clark again said that he smoked marijuana every day and Under section 513.03 of the Euclid Codified Ordinances, possession of any 1 amount of marijuana is a first-degree misdemeanor and an arrestable offense.”
State v. Ramsier, 2011-Ohio-2295. · cites it 2ד12(C)(1); possession of marijuana, pursuant to Ashland City Ordinance Section 513.03(C)(3); and disorderly conduct, pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Section 2912.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 513.03(A): 2 cases
City of Medina v. Szwec, 809 N.E.2d 78 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 2004). “” {¶ 3} In its sole assignment of error, the city asserts that the trial court erroneously concluded that Section 513.03 was in conflict with R.C. 2925.”
City of Cleveland Heights v. Perryman, 457 N.E.2d 926 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1983). “01(A), and “possession of marijuana” in violation of Municipal Code Section 513.03(A). After a one-day recess to consider these motions, the trial court sent counsel notice that the city’s motion to amend was sustained, defendant’s motion to dismiss was overruled, and the case…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 513.03(C)(3): 1 case
State v. Ramsier, 2011-Ohio-2295. “12(C)(1); possession of marijuana, pursuant to Ashland City Ordinance Section 513.03(C)(3); and disorderly conduct, pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Section 2912.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.