Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 519
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 519.99 (2026)

Penalty

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Whoever violates sections 519.01 to 519.25 of the Revised Code shall be assessed a civil fine of not more than five hundred dollars for each offense. The fine shall be collected by filing a civil action in the court of common pleas in the county where the property at issue is located. The complaint may combine a cause of action for collection of civil fines under this section with a cause of action for injunction, abatement, mandamus, or other appropriate relief under section 519.24 of the Revised Code. Each day the violation continues from the date of a judgment granting relief under this section shall constitute a separate offense.

Last updated February 19, 2025 at 10:28 AM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1955–2025 · leading case: SP9 Ent. Trust v. Brauen, 2014-Ohio-4870.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
SP9 Ent. Trust v. Brauen, 2014-Ohio-4870. · cites it 2× “Any person, firm or corporation who violates this Resolution or fails to comply with any of its requirements shall be fined the maximum allowable pursuant to Section 519.99 of the Ohio Revised Code or in such statue [sic] as it may hereafter be amended.”
Mantua Twp. Bd. of Trs. v. Kukral, 2022-Ohio-1721. · cites it 9× “, R.C. 519.99, applies only to criminal prosecutions and not to civil actions for injunctive relief.”
State v. Keith, 720 N.E.2d 216 (Ohio Ct. App. 12th Dist. 1998). “R.C. 519.99(A) provides that “[w]hoever violates Sections 519.”
State v. Grater, 2018-Ohio-3000. · cites it 3× “7-18-01 to 7-18-18 exceed the maximum permissible fines under R.C. 519.99. We will first address Norma and Charles’s arguments concerning the constitutionality of the Resolution, then we will examine whether the fines levied against Norma and Charles exceed the maximum amount…”
State v. Workman, 2014-Ohio-258. “” Furthermore, R.C. 519.99 provides that “[w]hoever violates [R.”
Rootstown Twp Bd. of Trs. v. Helmlin, 2022-Ohio-4045, 201 N.E.3d 14. · cites it 8× “00 per day for each day that the property remained in noncompliance with the resolution pursuant to R.C. 519.99. {¶3} On April 13, 2017, the magistrate issued a decision, adopted by the trial court on the same date.”
Johnson v. Griffiths, 74 Ohio Law. Abs. 482 (Ohio Ct. App. 1955). “01—§519.99 R. C., inclusive, with reference to township zoning under which the rezoning was had.”
Russell v. Austintown Twp. Zoning Inspector, 2016-Ohio-8547. · cites it 2× “466 acre parcel, Tract 6 No 9, Austintown Township, located in a Residence R-1 and Agriculture A-SER District, namely, an accumulation of abandoned, wrecked, unused, and/or dismantled -2- automobiles, trucks, automobile and truck parts, and other junk items and materials; all of…”
Auburn Twp. Bd. of Trs. v. Sedensky, 2025-Ohio-4911. “The Board’s complaint further requested penalties pursuant to R.C. 519.99. However, the trial court dismissed the claim for penalties prior to summary judgment proceedings, and the issue of penalties is not relevant to this appeal.”
State v. Spano, 2011-Ohio-6026, 966 N.E.2d 908. “See R.C. 519.99. The maximum penalty under the Canfield zoning regulations is a fine of $100 per violation in any 24-hour period.”
State v. Pierce, 164 Ohio St. (N.S.) 482 (Ohio 1956). · cites it 2× “” And Section 519.99, Revised Code, provides a penalty as follows: “Whoever violates Section 519.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 519.99(A): 1 case
State v. Keith, 720 N.E.2d 216 (Ohio Ct. App. 12th Dist. 1998). “R.C. 519.99(A) provides that “[w]hoever violates Sections 519.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.