Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 5529
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 5529.06 (2026)

Maintenance of roadside rest areas

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
July 1, 1989
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 381 - 118th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

(A) The director of transportation shall develop and implement a program for improving the roadside rest area system along highways of the interstate system and the primary system. Each sanitary facility in the roadside rest area system on the interstate system and at selected locations on the primary system that is upgraded shall have potable water, water flush toilets, and wash basins equipped with running water for the use of the traveling public, in accordance with standards developed by the department of transportation as approved by the appropriate state and federal agencies.

(B) The director shall provide that each sanitary facility in a roadside rest area be kept clean and maintained in a sanitary condition.

(C) The director shall provide for beautification projects along the state highway system.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1991–1991 · leading case: Smith v. Gilbraith, 599 N.E.2d 798 (Ohio Ct. App. 11th Dist. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Smith v. Gilbraith, 599 N.E.2d 798 (Ohio Ct. App. 11th Dist. 1991). · cites it 3× “In a judgment issued on September 14, 1990, the trial court found, inter alia, that the requirements for upgrading the rest area system throughout the state of Ohio imposed under R.C. 5529.06 could not be carried out within the “fee simple” distance limitations of R.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 5529.06(A): 1 case
Smith v. Gilbraith, 599 N.E.2d 798 (Ohio Ct. App. 11th Dist. 1991). “In a judgment issued on September 14, 1990, the trial court found, inter alia, that the requirements for upgrading the rest area system throughout the state of Ohio imposed under R.C. 5529.06 could not be carried out within the “fee simple” distance limitations of R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.