Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 5553.11 (2026)

Proceedings after improvement ordered

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If the proceeding is for an improvement other than the vacation of a road and the board of county commissioners, at its final hearing on the proposed improvement, orders the improvement established, it shall proceed in accordance with sections 163.01 to 163.22 of the Revised Code.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1960–2016 · leading case: State ex rel. Patrick Bros., A Gen. P'ship v. Putnam Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 2014-Ohio-2717.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Patrick Bros., A Gen. P'ship v. Putnam Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 2014-Ohio-2717. · cites it 3× “R.C. 5553.11. A review of all the previous statutes, especially R.”
State ex rel. Jeffers v. Athens Cty. Commrs., 2016-Ohio-8119. “See R.C. 5553.11, eff. 4-7-09. It may have been a goal to have this change apply to the current case.”
Jeffers v. Athens Cty. Commrs., 2011-Ohio-675. · cites it 7× “{¶30} In its second assignment of error, the Board contends that the trial court erred by issuing the writ because Jeffers does not have a clear legal right to the requested relief.”
State Ex Rel. Gateway Realty Co. v. Kiefaber, 175 N.E.2d 858 (Ohio Ct. App. 1960). · cites it 10× “The sole issue presented to this court for determination is whether the appellant, by virtue of a duly recorded ninety nine (99) year lease, is an “owner” within the contemplation of Section 5553.11, Revised Code, which reads in part as follows: “If the board of county…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.