Okla. Stat. » Title 10 — CHILDREN
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 19 (2026)

Renumbered as § 112.2A of Title 43 by Laws 2009, c. 233, §

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

202, emerg. eff. May 21, 2009.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1997–2008 · leading case: Mahmoodjanloo v. Mahmoodjanloo, 2007 OK 32 (Okla. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mahmoodjanloo v. Mahmoodjanloo, 2007 OK 32 (Okla. 2007). · cites it 6× “¶ 2 The right of a custodial parent to relocate to a distant new home with his or her child when that move is opposed by the noncustodial parent is governed by two different statutes: 10 O.”
Casey v. Casey, 2002 OK 70 (Okla. 2002). · cites it 2× “Title 10 O.S.2001 § 19 provides: "A parent entitled to the custody of a child has a right to change his residence, subject to the power of the district court to restrain a removal which would prejudice the rights or welfare of the child.”
Stout v. Stout, 1997 ND 61 (N.D. 1997). “2(c) (1995)]; Oklahoma, [Okla.Stat. tit. 10, § 19 (1987)]; Oregon, [Or.”
Ireland v. Ireland, 717 A.2d 676 (Conn. 1998). “§ 14-09-07 (Michie 1997); Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 19 (West 1998); Or.”
Dupre v. Dupre, 857 A.2d 242 (R.I. 2004). “18(d) (2002) (presumption that court will retain the existing primary placement); Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 19 (West 1998) (in absence of a showing of prejudice to the rights or welfare of a child, a custodial parent has a presumptive right to change their child's residence);…”
Dupré v. Dupré, 857 A.2d 242 (R.I. 2004). “18(d) (2002) (presumption that court will retain the existing primary placement); Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 19 (West 1998) (in absence of a showing of prejudice to the rights or welfare of a child, a custodial parent has a presumptive right to change their child’s residence);…”
Harrison v. Morgan, 2008 OK CIV APP 68 (Okla. Civ. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “THE LEGAL STANDARDS ¶ 5 From at least 1910 until November 1, 2002, Oklahoma's law concerning the ability of a parent with custody of a minor to change the child's residence was succinctly stated in 10 O.S.2001 § 19, which provides: "[a] parent entitled to the custody of a child…”
Atkinson v. Atkinson, 149 P.3d 1055 (Okla. Civ. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “126 For a final proposition of error, Mother asserts § 112.”
Griggs v. McKinney, 61 P.3d 907 (Okla. Civ. App. 2002). “If we understand Father’s argument, he believes it is inequitable for him to bear any increased costs associated with Mother’s decision to relocate.”
Dvorak v. AgriBank, FCB, 1997 ND 53 (N.D. 1997). “2 (c) (1995)]; Oklahoma, [ Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 19 (1987)]; Oregon,[Or.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.