Okla. Stat. » Title 10 — CHILDREN
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 40.4 (2026)

Indian child custody proceedings – Notice

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. In all Indian child custody proceedings of the Oklahoma Indian Child Welfare Act, including voluntary court proceedings and review hearings, the court shall ensure that the district attorney or other person initiating the proceeding shall send notice to the parents or to the Indian custodians, if any, and to the tribe that is or may be the tribe of the Indian child, and to the appropriate Bureau of Indian Affairs area office, by certified mail return receipt requested, except as provided by subsection B of this section. The notice shall be written in clear and understandable language and include the following information:

1. The name and tribal affiliation of the Indian child; 2. A copy of the petition by which the proceeding was initiated; 3. A statement of the rights of the biological parents or Indian custodians, and the Indian tribe: a. to intervene in the proceeding, b. to petition the court to transfer the proceeding to the tribal court of the Indian child, and c. to request an additional twenty (20) days from receipt of notice to prepare for the proceeding; further extensions of time may be granted with court approval; 4. A statement of the potential legal consequences of an adjudication on the future custodial rights of the parents or Indian custodians; 5. A statement that if the parents or Indian custodians are unable to afford counsel, counsel will be appointed to represent them; and 6. A statement that tribal officials should keep confidential the information contained in the notice. B. Notice of review hearings shall be sent, via regular first- class mail, to the tribe of the Indian child unless the tribe is present at the time the review hearing is set and consents to the date of the review. A tribe's right to notice under this section is not dependent on intervention into the case. The notice shall be evidenced by filing a certificate of mailing prior to the review hearing. Added by Laws 1982, c. 107, § 5, emerg. eff. April 6, 1982. Amended by Laws 1994, c. 30, § 3, eff. Sept 1, 1994; Laws 2006, c. 136, § 2, eff. Nov. 1, 2006; Laws 2017, c. 81, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 2017.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1988–2016 · leading case: In re the Guardianship of Q.G.M., 808 P.2d 684 (Okla. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re the Guardianship of Q.G.M., 808 P.2d 684 (Okla. 1991). · cites it 2× “" Title 10 O.S.Supp.1982 § 40.4 provides in pertinent part: "In any involuntary Indian child custody proceeding.”
Matter of Adoption of R.R.R., 763 P.2d 94 (Okla. 1988). · cites it 2× “In compliance with the Oklahoma Indian Child Welfare Act, 10 O.S.Supp.1982 § 40.4, 21 the Kiowa Tribal Office and the *101 area office of the Bureau of Indian Affairs were notified.”
Matter of Adoption of RRR, 763 P.2d 94 (Okla. 1988). · cites it 2× “In compliance with the Oklahoma Indian Child Welfare Act, 10 O.S.Supp. 1982 § 40.4, [21] the Kiowa Tribal Office and the *101 area office of the Bureau of Indian Affairs were notified.”
In the Guardianship of C.H.S., 2016 OK CIV APP 72, 394 P.3d 278. · cites it 2× “§ 1911 (a) and 10 O.S. § 40.4. The trial court acknowledges that “[t]he record does not include proof of notice of the Guardianship Petition to Cherokee Nation.”
In the Guardianship of C.H.S., 2016 OK CIV APP 72. · cites it 6× “§ 1911(a) and 10 O.S. § 40.4. The trial court acknowledges that "[t]he record does not include proof of notice of the Guardianship Petition to Cherokee Nation.”
In the Matter of the Adoption of B.T.S., 2016 OK CIV APP 21. “eligible for adoption and termination of Mother's parental rights, as required by 10 O.S. 2011 § 40.4. 3 Further, Mother argues the required "notice" is something other than the "petitions" and that notice requires particular information including "[t]he child's tribal…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.