Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7303-4.3 (2026)
Renumbered as § 2-2-403 of Title 10A by Laws 2009, c
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
234, § 180, emerg. eff. May 21, 2009.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1996–2010 · leading case: State v. Green, 502 S.E.2d 819 (N.C. 1998).
State v. Green, 502 S.E.2d 819 (N.C. 1998). “1974), Idaho Code §§ 20-508 , 20-509 (1997), Me.Rev.Stat. Ann. tit.”
Wilson v. State of Oklahoma, 363 F. App'x 595 (10th Cir. 2010). “In doing so, he considered the factors set forth in Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 7303-4.3 (B), finding: (1) the offense was committed in an aggressive, violent, premeditated and willful manner against a person and resulted in the loss of a person’s life; (2) Wilson had a fair…”
D.J.B. v. Pritchett, 134 P.3d 147 (Okla. Crim. App. 2005). “¶ 5 The second Code provision relied upon by Petitioner is found within 10 O.S.Supp. 2004, § 7303-4.3. That statute sets out the procedures for regular certification of juveniles charged with non-enumerated felonies.”
State v. Gonzales, 24 P.3d 776 (N.M. Ct. App. 2001). “125 (1999); Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 7303-4.3 (1997); Wis.”
State v. Murray, 947 P.2d 591 (Okla. Crim. App. 1997). “4 Because the record does not show that Appellee could be charged as an adult for the crimes charged, as set forth in 10 O.S.Supp.1995, §§ 7303-4.3(D) or 7306-1.”
Maxey v. State, 922 P.2d 642 (Okla. Crim. App. 1996). “The particular statute dealing with certification is now found at 10 O.S.Supp. 1995, § 7303-4.3. . The second degree murder instructions were given by the court at the request of the prosecution.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7303-4.3(D) — 2 cases
D.J.B. v. Pritchett, 134 P.3d 147 (Okla. Crim. App. 2005). “¶ 5 The second Code provision relied upon by Petitioner is found within 10 O.S.Supp. 2004, § 7303-4.3. That statute sets out the procedures for regular certification of juveniles charged with non-enumerated felonies.”
State v. Murray, 947 P.2d 591 (Okla. Crim. App. 1997). “4 Because the record does not show that Appellee could be charged as an adult for the crimes charged, as set forth in 10 O.S.Supp.1995, §§ 7303-4.3(D) or 7306-1.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.