Okla. Stat. » Title 10 — CHILDREN
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.10 (2026)

Renumbered as § 2-5-210 of Title 10A by Laws 2009,

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

c. 234, § 188, emerg. eff. May 21, 2009.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1999–2010 · leading case: Triplet v. Franklin, 365 F. App'x 86 (10th Cir. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Triplet v. Franklin, 365 F. App'x 86 (10th Cir. 2010). “Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 7306-2.10 (A).”
R.M.J. v. State, 2006 OK CR 18, 135 P.3d 1286. · cites it 18× “” The motion alleged the State failed to timely conduct a review hearing pursuant to 10 O.S. § 7306-2.10 to extend O.J.A.’s ability to keep Appellant in custody beyond his 18th birthday.”
K.M.C. v. State, 2009 OK CR 29, 221 P.3d 735. · cites it 2× “Title 10 O.S. § 7306-2.10 was renumbered as 10A O.”
C.R.B. v. State, 1999 OK CR 1, 973 P.2d 339. · cites it 2× “10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.10(A). *341 ¶ 12 The court is required to conduct a semiannual review based upon written reports of the youth’s conduct, progress and condition.”
In re MB, 2006 OK 63, 145 P.3d 1040. · cites it 5× “[8] ¶ 6 At the outset, we note that if an offender is sentenced while under the age of eighteen, and remains under the supervision or in the custody of the OJA, the trial court is required to hold a "pre-birthday" review hearing within thirty days of the offender's eighteenth…”
B.J.B. v. State, 2004 OK 17, 88 P.3d 931. “At 10 O.S.2001, § 7306-2.10(F), it is provided that the trial court, at the conclusion of any review hearing in open court and after consideration of all reports and other evidence properly submitted to the court, may proceed as provided in Section 991a of Title 22 and impose…”
V.J.A. v. State, 1999 OK CR 40, 993 P.2d 773. “…the court may sentence a youthful offender up to a maximum of ten (10) years in the custody of 0.J.A. . See 10 O.S.Supp. 1997, § 7306-2.10.”
CRB v. State, 1999 OK CR 1, 973 P.2d 339. · cites it 2× “10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.10(A). *341 ¶ 12 The court is required to conduct a semiannual review based upon written reports of the youth's conduct, progress and condition.”
KMC v. State, 2009 OK CR 29, 221 P.3d 735. · cites it 2× “[2] Title 10 O.S. § 7306-2.10 was renumbered as 10A O.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.10(0): 1 case
R.M.J. v. State, 2006 OK CR 18, 135 P.3d 1286. “” The motion alleged the State failed to timely conduct a review hearing pursuant to 10 O.S. § 7306-2.10 to extend O.J.A.’s ability to keep Appellant in custody beyond his 18th birthday.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.10(A): 2 cases
C.R.B. v. State, 1999 OK CR 1, 973 P.2d 339. “10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.10(A). *341 ¶ 12 The court is required to conduct a semiannual review based upon written reports of the youth’s conduct, progress and condition.”
CRB v. State, 1999 OK CR 1, 973 P.2d 339. “10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.10(A). *341 ¶ 12 The court is required to conduct a semiannual review based upon written reports of the youth's conduct, progress and condition.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.10(B): 1 case
R.M.J. v. State, 2006 OK CR 18, 135 P.3d 1286. “” The motion alleged the State failed to timely conduct a review hearing pursuant to 10 O.S. § 7306-2.10 to extend O.J.A.’s ability to keep Appellant in custody beyond his 18th birthday.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.10(D): 2 cases
R.M.J. v. State, 2006 OK CR 18, 135 P.3d 1286. “” The motion alleged the State failed to timely conduct a review hearing pursuant to 10 O.S. § 7306-2.10 to extend O.J.A.’s ability to keep Appellant in custody beyond his 18th birthday.”
In re MB, 2006 OK 63, 145 P.3d 1040. “[8] ¶ 6 At the outset, we note that if an offender is sentenced while under the age of eighteen, and remains under the supervision or in the custody of the OJA, the trial court is required to hold a "pre-birthday" review hearing within thirty days of the offender's eighteenth…”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.10(F): 5 cases
C.R.B. v. State, 1999 OK CR 1, 973 P.2d 339. “10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.10(A). *341 ¶ 12 The court is required to conduct a semiannual review based upon written reports of the youth’s conduct, progress and condition.”
R.M.J. v. State, 2006 OK CR 18, 135 P.3d 1286. “” The motion alleged the State failed to timely conduct a review hearing pursuant to 10 O.S. § 7306-2.10 to extend O.J.A.’s ability to keep Appellant in custody beyond his 18th birthday.”
B.J.B. v. State, 2004 OK 17, 88 P.3d 931. “At 10 O.S.2001, § 7306-2.10(F), it is provided that the trial court, at the conclusion of any review hearing in open court and after consideration of all reports and other evidence properly submitted to the court, may proceed as provided in Section 991a of Title 22 and impose…”
In re MB, 2006 OK 63, 145 P.3d 1040. “[8] ¶ 6 At the outset, we note that if an offender is sentenced while under the age of eighteen, and remains under the supervision or in the custody of the OJA, the trial court is required to hold a "pre-birthday" review hearing within thirty days of the offender's eighteenth…”
CRB v. State, 1999 OK CR 1, 973 P.2d 339. “10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.10(A). *341 ¶ 12 The court is required to conduct a semiannual review based upon written reports of the youth's conduct, progress and condition.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.10(F)(6): 1 case
In re MB, 2006 OK 63, 145 P.3d 1040. “[8] ¶ 6 At the outset, we note that if an offender is sentenced while under the age of eighteen, and remains under the supervision or in the custody of the OJA, the trial court is required to hold a "pre-birthday" review hearing within thirty days of the offender's eighteenth…”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.10(G): 2 cases
K.M.C. v. State, 2009 OK CR 29, 221 P.3d 735. “Title 10 O.S. § 7306-2.10 was renumbered as 10A O.”
KMC v. State, 2009 OK CR 29, 221 P.3d 735. “[2] Title 10 O.S. § 7306-2.10 was renumbered as 10A O.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.10(H): 1 case
In re MB, 2006 OK 63, 145 P.3d 1040. “[8] ¶ 6 At the outset, we note that if an offender is sentenced while under the age of eighteen, and remains under the supervision or in the custody of the OJA, the trial court is required to hold a "pre-birthday" review hearing within thirty days of the offender's eighteenth…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.