Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.2 (2026)
Renumbered as § 2-5-202 of Title 10A by Laws 2009, c
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
234, § 188, emerg. eff. May 21, 2009.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1999–2010 · leading case: State v. Dist. Court of Oklahoma Cnty., 2007 OK CR 3, 154 P.3d 84.
State v. Dist. Court of Oklahoma Cnty., 2007 OK CR 3, 154 P.3d 84. “1 15 The State argues that "with one minor exception relating to gender neutral language, the amended provisions of Okla. Stat. tit. 10 §§ 7306-2.2 and 7306-2.”
Triplet v. Franklin, 365 F. App'x 86 (10th Cir. 2010). “" See Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 7306-2.2 (B) (2000); see also G.”
C.L.F. v. State, 1999 OK CR 12, 989 P.2d 945. “*947 ¶ 6 The statement of policy and purpose of the Youthful Offender Act is set forth in 10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.2(B): It is the purpose of the Youthful Offender Act to better ensure the public safety by holding youths accountable for the commission of serious crimes, while…”
K.M.C. v. State, 2009 OK CR 29, 221 P.3d 735. “Formerly 10 O.S.Supp.2008, § 7306-2.2(B) (renumbered eff.”
Maw v. State, 2008 OK CR 16, 185 P.3d 388. “challenges the district court's denial of his request for youthful offender status by raising the following claims: (1) House Bill 2195, a bill enacted in 2007 revising the Youthful Offender Act provisions that had been recently codified at 10 O.S.Supp.2006, §§ 7306-2.2 and…”
CLF v. State, 1999 OK CR 12, 989 P.2d 945. “*947 ¶ 6 The statement of policy and purpose of the Youthful Offender Act is set forth in 10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.2(B): It is the purpose of the Youthful Offender Act to better ensure the public safety by holding youths accountable for the commission of serious crimes, while…”
V.J.A. v. State, 1999 OK CR 40, 993 P.2d 773. “” 10 O.S.Supp. 1997, § 7306-2.2(B.). (Emphasis added).”
R.M.J. v. State, 2006 OK CR 18, 135 P.3d 1286. “¶ 17 As we have noted on numerous occasions when considering Youthful Offender issues, the purpose of the Youthful Offender Act is clearly set out in 10 O.S. § 7306-2.2(B) which states: *1290 It is the purpose of the Youthful Offender Act to better ensure the public safety by…”
In Re Mb, 2006 OK 63, 145 P.3d 1040. “[2] Title 10 O.S.2001 § 7306-2.2 provides in pertinent part: A.”
KMC v. State, 2009 OK CR 29, 221 P.3d 735. “" [3] Formerly 10 O.S.Supp.2008, § 7306-2.2(B) (renumbered eff.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.2(A)(1)(a): 1 case
Maw v. State, 2008 OK CR 16, 185 P.3d 388. “challenges the district court's denial of his request for youthful offender status by raising the following claims: (1) House Bill 2195, a bill enacted in 2007 revising the Youthful Offender Act provisions that had been recently codified at 10 O.S.Supp.2006, §§ 7306-2.2 and…”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.2(B): 6 cases
C.L.F. v. State, 1999 OK CR 12, 989 P.2d 945. “*947 ¶ 6 The statement of policy and purpose of the Youthful Offender Act is set forth in 10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.2(B): It is the purpose of the Youthful Offender Act to better ensure the public safety by holding youths accountable for the commission of serious crimes, while…”
K.M.C. v. State, 2009 OK CR 29, 221 P.3d 735. “Formerly 10 O.S.Supp.2008, § 7306-2.2(B) (renumbered eff.”
CLF v. State, 1999 OK CR 12, 989 P.2d 945. “*947 ¶ 6 The statement of policy and purpose of the Youthful Offender Act is set forth in 10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.2(B): It is the purpose of the Youthful Offender Act to better ensure the public safety by holding youths accountable for the commission of serious crimes, while…”
R.M.J. v. State, 2006 OK CR 18, 135 P.3d 1286. “¶ 17 As we have noted on numerous occasions when considering Youthful Offender issues, the purpose of the Youthful Offender Act is clearly set out in 10 O.S. § 7306-2.2(B) which states: *1290 It is the purpose of the Youthful Offender Act to better ensure the public safety by…”
V.J.A. v. State, 1999 OK CR 40, 993 P.2d 773. “” 10 O.S.Supp. 1997, § 7306-2.2(B.). (Emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.