Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.5 (2026)
Renumbered as § 2-5-205 of Title 10A by Laws 2009, c
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
234, § 188, emerg. eff. May 21, 2009.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1999–2008 · leading case: C.R.B. v. State, 1999 OK CR 1, 973 P.2d 339.
C.R.B. v. State, 1999 OK CR 1, 973 P.2d 339. “” 10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.5(A). ¶ 7 Prior to enactment of the Youthful Offender Act, any person age 13,14,15,16 or 17, charged with murder in the first degree was considered as an adult and the only option available to the youth was certification as a juvenile.”
W.L.A. v. State, 2002 OK CR 38, 60 P.3d 1043. “¶ 17 In their third assignment of error, Appellants argue the trial court erred in not completing the preliminary hearing within the 90 days allotted by 10 O.S.2001, § 7306-2.5(0(2). The record reveals the criminal Informations were filed against Appellants on February 11, 2002.”
CLF v. State, 1999 OK CR 12, 989 P.2d 945. “The propositions were presented to this Court in oral argument February 25, 1999, pursuant to Rule 11.”
V.J.A. v. State, 1999 OK CR 40, 993 P.2d 773. “” ¶ 6 The District Court determined, considering the relevant criteria specified at 10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.5(D)(l)-(7), that Appellant’s request for certification as a Youthful Offender should be denied.”
CRB v. State, 1999 OK CR 1, 973 P.2d 339. “" 10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.5(A). ¶ 7 Prior to enactment of the Youthful Offender Act, any person age 13, 14, 15, 16 or 17, charged with murder in the first degree was considered as an adult and the only option available to the youth was certification as a juvenile.”
In Re MB, 2006 OK 63, 145 P.3d 1040. “6(F)(5) provides: An order certifying a person or denying such certification to the juvenile system shall be a final order, appealable when entered.”
Maw v. State, 2008 OK CR 16, 185 P.3d 388. “net/applications/oscn/Deliver Document.asp?CiteID=438407; and 2003 Okla.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.5(A): 3 cases
C.R.B. v. State, 1999 OK CR 1, 973 P.2d 339. “” 10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.5(A). ¶ 7 Prior to enactment of the Youthful Offender Act, any person age 13,14,15,16 or 17, charged with murder in the first degree was considered as an adult and the only option available to the youth was certification as a juvenile.”
CLF v. State, 1999 OK CR 12, 989 P.2d 945. “The propositions were presented to this Court in oral argument February 25, 1999, pursuant to Rule 11.”
CRB v. State, 1999 OK CR 1, 973 P.2d 339. “" 10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.5(A). ¶ 7 Prior to enactment of the Youthful Offender Act, any person age 13, 14, 15, 16 or 17, charged with murder in the first degree was considered as an adult and the only option available to the youth was certification as a juvenile.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.5(B): 1 case
Maw v. State, 2008 OK CR 16, 185 P.3d 388. “net/applications/oscn/Deliver Document.asp?CiteID=438407; and 2003 Okla.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.5(D): 3 cases
C.R.B. v. State, 1999 OK CR 1, 973 P.2d 339. “” 10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.5(A). ¶ 7 Prior to enactment of the Youthful Offender Act, any person age 13,14,15,16 or 17, charged with murder in the first degree was considered as an adult and the only option available to the youth was certification as a juvenile.”
W.L.A. v. State, 2002 OK CR 38, 60 P.3d 1043. “¶ 17 In their third assignment of error, Appellants argue the trial court erred in not completing the preliminary hearing within the 90 days allotted by 10 O.S.2001, § 7306-2.5(0(2). The record reveals the criminal Informations were filed against Appellants on February 11, 2002.”
CRB v. State, 1999 OK CR 1, 973 P.2d 339. “" 10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.5(A). ¶ 7 Prior to enactment of the Youthful Offender Act, any person age 13, 14, 15, 16 or 17, charged with murder in the first degree was considered as an adult and the only option available to the youth was certification as a juvenile.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.5(D)(l): 1 case
V.J.A. v. State, 1999 OK CR 40, 993 P.2d 773. “” ¶ 6 The District Court determined, considering the relevant criteria specified at 10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.5(D)(l)-(7), that Appellant’s request for certification as a Youthful Offender should be denied.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.5(E): 1 case
In Re MB, 2006 OK 63, 145 P.3d 1040. “6(F)(5) provides: An order certifying a person or denying such certification to the juvenile system shall be a final order, appealable when entered.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.