Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.8 (2026)
Renumbered as § 2-5-208 of Title 10A by Laws 2009, c
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
234, § 188, emerg. eff. May 21, 2009.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1999–2011 · leading case: Triplet v. Franklin, 365 F. App'x 86 (10th Cir. 2010).
Triplet v. Franklin, 365 F. App'x 86 (10th Cir. 2010). “” Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 7306-2.8 (E).”
A.J.B. v. State, 1999 OK CR 50, 992 P.2d 911. “CF-99-483 and CF-99-484, granting the State’s motion to sentence them as adults, pursuant to 10 O.S.Supp.1998, § 7306-2.8. In those cases, Appellants were charged as Youthful Offenders with Robbery With a Dangerous Weapon.”
G.G. v. State, 1999 OK CR 7, 989 P.2d 936. “10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.8(0(2). ¶ 10 The Legislature directed that the trial court shall certify the person as eligible for the imposition of an adult sentence only after a hearing and after consideration of the report of the investigation and “only if it finds by clear and…”
W.L.A. v. State, 2002 OK CR 38, 60 P.3d 1043. “Typically, the State of Oklahoma files its motion(s) for imposition of adult sentence no later than thirty (30) days following a defendant’s formal arraignment, pursuant to 10 O.S.2001, § 7306-2.8(A)(l). After that filing is made, a hearing is then scheduled by the trial court…”
United States v. Coleman, 656 F.3d 1089 (10th Cir. 2011). “Furthermore, the YOA permits an eligible youthful offender to receive an adult sentence under certain circumstances, see Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.8 . Thus, Coleman could have received adult sentences in excess of 10 years in his initial adjudications.”
AJB v. State, 1999 OK CR 50, 992 P.2d 911. “Appellants' motions for certification as juveniles were denied and they were bound over as Youthful Offenders on the charges.”
In Re MB, 2006 OK 63, 145 P.3d 1040. “[4] Title 10 O.S.2001 § 7306-2.8(A) provides in pertinent part: Whenever the district attorney believes that there is good cause to believe that a person charged as a youthful offender would not reasonably complete a plan of rehabilitation or the public would not be adequately…”
GG v. State, 1999 OK CR 7, 989 P.2d 936. “10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.8(A). This motion must be filed not less than ten days prior to trial or at the time of a guilty plea or plea of nolo contendere.”
KMC v. State, 2009 OK CR 29, 221 P.3d 735. “NOTES [1] Formerly 10 O.S.Supp.2008, § 7306-2.8 (renumbered eff.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.8(A): 5 cases
G.G. v. State, 1999 OK CR 7, 989 P.2d 936. “10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.8(0(2). ¶ 10 The Legislature directed that the trial court shall certify the person as eligible for the imposition of an adult sentence only after a hearing and after consideration of the report of the investigation and “only if it finds by clear and…”
A.J.B. v. State, 1999 OK CR 50, 992 P.2d 911. “CF-99-483 and CF-99-484, granting the State’s motion to sentence them as adults, pursuant to 10 O.S.Supp.1998, § 7306-2.8. In those cases, Appellants were charged as Youthful Offenders with Robbery With a Dangerous Weapon.”
AJB v. State, 1999 OK CR 50, 992 P.2d 911. “Appellants' motions for certification as juveniles were denied and they were bound over as Youthful Offenders on the charges.”
In Re MB, 2006 OK 63, 145 P.3d 1040. “[4] Title 10 O.S.2001 § 7306-2.8(A) provides in pertinent part: Whenever the district attorney believes that there is good cause to believe that a person charged as a youthful offender would not reasonably complete a plan of rehabilitation or the public would not be adequately…”
GG v. State, 1999 OK CR 7, 989 P.2d 936. “10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.8(A). This motion must be filed not less than ten days prior to trial or at the time of a guilty plea or plea of nolo contendere.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.8(A)(l): 1 case
W.L.A. v. State, 2002 OK CR 38, 60 P.3d 1043. “Typically, the State of Oklahoma files its motion(s) for imposition of adult sentence no later than thirty (30) days following a defendant’s formal arraignment, pursuant to 10 O.S.2001, § 7306-2.8(A)(l). After that filing is made, a hearing is then scheduled by the trial court…”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.8(B): 3 cases
A.J.B. v. State, 1999 OK CR 50, 992 P.2d 911. “CF-99-483 and CF-99-484, granting the State’s motion to sentence them as adults, pursuant to 10 O.S.Supp.1998, § 7306-2.8. In those cases, Appellants were charged as Youthful Offenders with Robbery With a Dangerous Weapon.”
W.L.A. v. State, 2002 OK CR 38, 60 P.3d 1043. “Typically, the State of Oklahoma files its motion(s) for imposition of adult sentence no later than thirty (30) days following a defendant’s formal arraignment, pursuant to 10 O.S.2001, § 7306-2.8(A)(l). After that filing is made, a hearing is then scheduled by the trial court…”
AJB v. State, 1999 OK CR 50, 992 P.2d 911. “Appellants' motions for certification as juveniles were denied and they were bound over as Youthful Offenders on the charges.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.8(C)(2): 1 case
GG v. State, 1999 OK CR 7, 989 P.2d 936. “10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.8(A). This motion must be filed not less than ten days prior to trial or at the time of a guilty plea or plea of nolo contendere.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.8(D): 2 cases
G.G. v. State, 1999 OK CR 7, 989 P.2d 936. “10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.8(0(2). ¶ 10 The Legislature directed that the trial court shall certify the person as eligible for the imposition of an adult sentence only after a hearing and after consideration of the report of the investigation and “only if it finds by clear and…”
GG v. State, 1999 OK CR 7, 989 P.2d 936. “10 O.S.Supp.1997, § 7306-2.8(A). This motion must be filed not less than ten days prior to trial or at the time of a guilty plea or plea of nolo contendere.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7306-2.8(E): 4 cases
W.L.A. v. State, 2002 OK CR 38, 60 P.3d 1043. “Typically, the State of Oklahoma files its motion(s) for imposition of adult sentence no later than thirty (30) days following a defendant’s formal arraignment, pursuant to 10 O.S.2001, § 7306-2.8(A)(l). After that filing is made, a hearing is then scheduled by the trial court…”
A.J.B. v. State, 1999 OK CR 50, 992 P.2d 911. “CF-99-483 and CF-99-484, granting the State’s motion to sentence them as adults, pursuant to 10 O.S.Supp.1998, § 7306-2.8. In those cases, Appellants were charged as Youthful Offenders with Robbery With a Dangerous Weapon.”
In Re MB, 2006 OK 63, 145 P.3d 1040. “[4] Title 10 O.S.2001 § 7306-2.8(A) provides in pertinent part: Whenever the district attorney believes that there is good cause to believe that a person charged as a youthful offender would not reasonably complete a plan of rehabilitation or the public would not be adequately…”
AJB v. State, 1999 OK CR 50, 992 P.2d 911. “Appellants' motions for certification as juveniles were denied and they were bound over as Youthful Offenders on the charges.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.