Okla. Stat. » Title 10A — CHILDREN AND JUVENILE CODE
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 10A, § 2-5-207 (2026)

Repealed by Laws 2022, c. 375, § 13, eff. Nov. 1,

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

2022.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2009–2022 · leading case: A.R.M. v. State, 2011 OK CR 25, 279 P.3d 797.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
A.R.M. v. State, 2011 OK CR 25, 279 P.3d 797. “The Legislature has clearly expressed its intent as set forth at 10A O.S.Supp.2010, § 2-5-207. While 17 year old offenders are eligible for treatment as youthful offenders, the time span for which treatment is available ends at age 18 years and 5 months.”
J.T.A. v. State, 422 P.3d 778 (Okla. Crim. App. 2018). “See 10A O.S.2011, § 2-5-207. The Youthful Offender Study, prepared by Ms.”
State v. K.B., 2022 OK CR 22, 518 P.3d 118. “" 10A O.S.Supp.2018, § 2-5-207. ¶20 Having reviewed the appellate record in this case, we find Judge Riesen's denial of the State's motion to impose an adult sentence was not an abuse of discretion and was supported by the facts and law.”
State v. J.B., 2022 OK CR 18, 516 P.3d 712. · cites it 3× “10A O.S.Supp.2009, § 2-5-207. ¶12 Following K.”
T.G.L. v. State, 2015 OK CR 4, 344 P.3d 1098. · cites it 5× “2011, § 2-2-102(B)(2)-(B)(3); 10A O.S.2011, § 2-5-207. As set forth in Edwards v.”
J.T.A. v. State, 2018 OK CR 12. · cites it 2× “See 10A O.S.2011, § 2-5-207. The Youthful Offender Study, prepared by Ms.”
State v. K.B., 2022 OK CR 22, 518 P.3d 118. “" 10A O.S.Supp.2018, § 2-5-207. ¶20 Having reviewed the appellate record in this case, we find Judge Riesen's denial of the State's motion to impose an adult sentence was not an abuse of discretion and was supported by the facts and law.”
KMC v. State, 2009 OK CR 29, 221 P.3d 735. · cites it 2× “" 10A O.S.Supp.2009, § 2-5-207. [4] ¶ 7 Based upon the above-cited statutes, this Court will not affirm orders granting motions to sentence youthful offenders as adults when the primary evidence and the only reasoning used to support the order is the age of the youthful offender.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.