Okla. Stat. » Title 11 — CITIES AND TOWNS
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 11, § 39-108 (2026)

Hearings on creation of district - Protests and

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

objections. A. At the hearing of the governing body on the proposed resolution creating a district, any interested person or owner of property to be assessed for the improvement may file a written protest or objection questioning the: 1. Propriety and advisability of constructing the improvement; 2. Estimated cost of the improvement; 3. Manner of paying for the improvement; and 4. Amount to be assessed against the individual tract or parcel of land. B. The governing body may recess the hearing from time to time so that all protestants may be heard. C. At the hearing, the governing body may: 1. Correct any mistake or irregularity in any proceeding relating to the improvement; 2. Correct an assessment made against any tract or parcel of land; 3. In case of any invalidity, reassess the cost of the improvement against an abutting tract or parcel of land;

4. Delete any tract or parcel of land, protested by the owner, from the district; and 5. Recess the hearing from time to time. D. Within thirty (30) days after the governing body has concluded the hearing; determined the advisability of constructing the improvement and the type and character of the improvement; and created the improvement district, any person who, during the hearing, filed a written protest with the governing body protesting the construction of the improvement may commence an action in district court to correct or set aside the determination of the governing body. After the lapse of thirty (30) days succeeding the determination of the governing body, any action attacking the validity of the proceedings and the amount of benefit to be derived from the improvement is perpetually barred. Provided, however, if the owners of fifty percent (50%) or more in area of the tracts or parcels within the district or a majority of the owners of record of property in the assessment area protest, in writing, the creation of the district, the district shall not be created. Added by Laws 1978, c. 233, § 8, emerg. eff. April 25, 1978. Amended by Laws 1985, c. 26, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 1985; Laws 1999, c. 343, § 3, eff. Nov. 1, 1999.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2020–2023 · leading case: Toch, LLC v. City of Tulsa, 2020 OK 81, 474 P.3d 859.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Toch, LLC v. City of Tulsa, 2020 OK 81, 474 P.3d 859. · cites it 12× “11 O.S.2011, § 39-108(D)(emphasis added).”
Toch v. City of Tulsa, 2023 OK 69, 532 P.3d 28. · cites it 6× “TOCH asserted numerous reasons why this TID was improperly created, one of which is whether the City's act of approving the TID violated 11 O.S.2011 § 39-108 ¶3 Following the issuance of the mandate in TOCH I , all parties filed their respective motions for summary judgment…”
Toch v. City of Tulsa, 2023 OK 69, 532 P.3d 28. · cites it 6× “TOCH asserted numerous reasons why this TID was improperly created, one of which is whether the City's act of approving the TID violated 11 O.S.2011 § 39-108 (D). 1 TOCH alleged that it did when City approved the Resolution to create the TID as more than fifty percent (50%) of…”
Okla. Stat. tit. 11, § 39-108(D): 2 cases
Toch, LLC v. City of Tulsa, 2020 OK 81, 474 P.3d 859. “11 O.S.2011, § 39-108(D)(emphasis added).”
Toch v. City of Tulsa, 2023 OK 69, 532 P.3d 28. “TOCH asserted numerous reasons why this TID was improperly created, one of which is whether the City's act of approving the TID violated 11 O.S.2011 § 39-108 (D). 1 TOCH alleged that it did when City approved the Resolution to create the TID as more than fifty percent (50%) of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.