Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1101.1 (2026)

Civil actions - Offers of judgment - Counteroffers -

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Recovery of costs and attorney fees. A. Actions for personal injury, wrongful death, and certain specified actions. 1. Subject to the provisions of paragraph 5 of this subsection, after a civil action is brought for the recovery of money as the result of a claim for personal injury, wrongful death, or pursuant to Chapter 21 of Title 25 or Section 5 of Title 85 of the Oklahoma Statutes, any defendant may file with the court, at any time more than ten (10) days prior to trial, an offer of judgment for a sum certain to any plaintiff with respect to the action or any claim or claims asserted in the action. An offer of judgment shall be deemed to include any costs or attorney fees otherwise recoverable unless it expressly provides otherwise. If an offer of judgment is filed, each plaintiff to whom an offer of judgment is made shall, within ten (10) days, file: a. a written acceptance or rejection of such offer, or b. a counteroffer of judgment, as described in paragraph 2 of this subsection. If the plaintiff fails to file a timely response, the offer of judgment shall be deemed rejected. The fact an offer of judgment is made but not accepted or is deemed rejected does not preclude subsequent timely offers of judgment. 2. In the event a defendant files an offer of judgment, the plaintiff may, within ten (10) days, file with the court a counteroffer of judgment directed to each defendant who has filed an offer of judgment. If a counteroffer of judgment is filed, each defendant to whom the counteroffer of judgment is made shall, within ten (10) days, file a written acceptance or rejection of the counteroffer of judgment. If a defendant fails to file a timely response, the counteroffer of judgment shall be deemed rejected. The fact a counteroffer of judgment is made but not accepted or deemed rejected does not preclude subsequent counteroffers of judgment if subsequent offers of judgment are made. 3. In the event the plaintiff rejects the offer(s) of judgment and the judgment awarded the plaintiff is less than the final offer of judgment, then the defendant filing the offer of judgment shall be entitled to recover reasonable litigation costs and reasonable attorney fees incurred by that defendant from the date of filing of the final offer of judgment until the date of the verdict. Such costs and fees may be offset from the judgment entered against the offering defendant; provided, however, that prior to any such offset, the plaintiff's attorney may:

a. exercise any attorneys lien claimed in an amount not to exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the judgment, and b. recover the plaintiff's reasonable litigation costs, not to exceed an additional fifteen percent (15%) of the judgment or Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00), whichever is greater. 4. In the event a defendant rejects the counteroffer(s) of judgment and the judgment awarded to the plaintiff is greater than the final counteroffer of judgment, the plaintiff shall be entitled to recover reasonable litigation costs and reasonable attorney fees incurred by the plaintiff from the date of filing of the final counteroffer of judgment until the date of the verdict. Such costs and fees may be added to the judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff. 5. The provisions of this subsection shall apply only where the plaintiff demands in a pleading or in trial proceedings more than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00), or where the defendant makes an offer of judgment more than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00). Any offer of judgment may precede the demand. B. Other actions. 1. After a civil action is brought for the recovery of money or property in an action other than for personal injury, wrongful death or pursuant to Chapter 21 of Title 25 or Section 5 of Title 85 of the Oklahoma Statutes, any defendant may file with the court, at any time more than ten (10) days prior to trial, an offer of judgment for a sum certain to any plaintiff with respect to the action or any claim or claims asserted in the action. An offer of judgment shall be deemed to include any costs and attorney fees otherwise recoverable unless it expressly provides otherwise. If an offer of judgment is filed, the plaintiff or plaintiffs to whom the offer of judgment is made shall, within ten (10) days, file: a. a written acceptance or rejection of the offer, or b. a counteroffer of judgment, as described in paragraph 2 of this subsection. If a plaintiff fails to file a timely response, the offer of judgment shall be deemed rejected. The fact an offer of judgment is made but not accepted or is deemed rejected does not preclude subsequent timely offers of judgment. 2. In the event a defendant files an offer of judgment, the plaintiff may, within ten (10) days, file with the court a counteroffer of judgment to each defendant who has filed an offer of judgment and the claim or claims which are the subject thereof. If a counteroffer of judgment is filed, each defendant to whom a counteroffer of judgment is made shall, within ten (10) days, file a written acceptance or rejection of the counteroffer of judgment. If a defendant fails to file a timely response, the counteroffer of

judgment shall be deemed rejected. The fact a counteroffer of judgment is made but not accepted or is deemed rejected does not preclude subsequent counteroffers of judgment if subsequent offers of judgment are made. 3. If no offer of judgment or counteroffer of judgment is accepted and the judgment awarded the plaintiff is less than one or more offers of judgment, the defendant shall be entitled to reasonable litigation costs and reasonable attorney fees incurred by the defendant with respect to the action or the claim or claims included in the offer of judgment from and after the date of the first offer of judgment which is greater than the judgment until the date of the judgment. Such costs and fees may be offset from the judgment entered against the offering defendant. 4. If no offer of judgment or counteroffer of judgment is accepted and the judgment awarded the plaintiff is greater than one or more counteroffers of judgment, the plaintiff shall be entitled to recover the reasonable litigation costs and reasonable attorney fees incurred by the plaintiff with respect to the action or the claim or claims included in the counteroffer of judgment from and after the date of the first counteroffer of judgment which is less than the judgment until the date of the judgment. Such costs and fees may be added to the judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff. 5. An award of reasonable litigation costs and reasonable attorneys fees under paragraph 3 of this subsection shall not preclude an award under paragraph 4 of this subsection, and an award under paragraph 4 of this subsection shall not preclude an award under paragraph 3 of this subsection. 6. This subsection shall not apply to actions brought pursuant to Chapter 21 of Title 25 or Section 5 of Title 85 of the Oklahoma Statutes. C. For purposes of comparing the amount of a judgment with the amount of an offer under paragraph 3 or 4 of subsection A of this section or paragraph 3 or 4 of subsection B of this section, attorney fees and costs otherwise recoverable shall be included in the amount of the compared judgment only if the offer was inclusive of attorney fees and costs. Fees or costs recoverable for work performed after the date of the offer shall not be included in the amount of the judgment for purposes of comparison. D. Evidence of an offer of judgment or a counteroffer of judgment shall not be admissible in any action or proceeding for any purpose except in proceedings to enforce a settlement arising out of an offer of judgment or counteroffer of judgment or to determine reasonable attorneys fees and reasonable litigation costs under this section. E. This section shall apply whether or not litigation costs or attorneys fees are otherwise recoverable.

F. The provisions of this section are severable, and if any part or provision thereof shall be held void, the decision of the court shall not affect or impair any of the remaining parts or provisions thereof. G. This section shall apply to all civil actions filed after the effective date of this act. Added by Laws 1995, c. 287, § 1. Amended by Laws 1999, c. 293, § 12, eff. Nov. 1, 1999; Laws 2002, c. 468, § 7, eff. Nov. 1, 2002.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 30 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2001–2026 · leading case: Boston Avenue Mgmt., Inc. v. Associated Resources, Inc., 2007 OK 5 (Okla. 2007).
Boston Avenue Mgmt., Inc. v. Associated Resources, Inc., 2007 OK 5 (Okla. 2007). · cites it 7× “The COCA's decision relied on 12 O.S. § 1101.1 as authority for the attorney fee award.”
Scottsdale Ins. v. Tolliver, 636 F.3d 1273 (10th Cir. 2011). · cites it 7× “The Tollivers contend that because the Oklahoma statute allowing such fees, Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1101.1 , is procedural and because that statute is in conflict with the procedure of Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the attorneys’ fees awarded by the district…”
Medlock v. Admiral Safe Co., Inc., 2005 OK CIV APP 72 (Okla. Civ. App. 2005). · cites it 6× “There must be a sufficiently definitive offer so each plaintiff can make a decision whether to accept the offer to confess judgment. While we concede the dissent's general statement of the law regarding singular and plural terms, the context of § 1101.”
Haddock v. Woodland Park Home, Inc., 2004 OK CIV APP 42 (Okla. Civ. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “Offer of Judgment did not comply with 12 O.S. § 1101.1 because it made one offer to both plaintiffs and did not afford them the opportunity to accept or reject the offer individually.”
Potter v. Synerlink Corp., 562 F. App'x 665 (10th Cir. 2014). · cites it 2× “Under Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1101.1 , a defendant may make offers of judgment at any time more than 10 days prior to trial.”
Worsham v. Nix, 2006 OK 67 (Okla. 2006). “That appeal was consolidated with the appeal by Plaintiffs, Rae Worsham, individually and as administratrix of the estate of Michael Worsham (decedent), and the estate of decedent in Case No.”
Marks v. Hentges (In Re Hentges), 373 B.R. 709 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 2007). “” 12 O.S. § 1101.1(D). Because this proceeding is an action to enforce a settlement arising out of an offer of judgment, Section 1101.”
Waits v. Viersen Oil & Gas Co., 2020 OK CIV APP 2 (Okla. Civ. App. 2019). “Viersen Has No Other Judgment That Could Provide a Basis for Fees ¶38 Viersen argues that, notwithstanding the validity of the "affirmative relief" doctrine of Professional Credit , it still had a statutory or common law basis for a fee award.”
Allen Farms, Inc. v. Broce Const. Co., Inc., 2006 OK CIV APP 36 (Okla. Civ. App. 2005). · cites it 3× “Alen filed a post-judgment motion to assess attorney’s fees and costs as the prevailing party on the *855 contract claim under 12 O.”
Schommer v. Communicate Now!, L.P., 2014 OK CIV APP 38 (Okla. Civ. App. 2014). · cites it 3× “, d/b/a Communication Solutions (Appellee), Plaintiffs Wayne Allen Schommer and Deborah Ann Schommer, husband and wife (collectively, the Schommers), appeal from a trial court judgment in their favor in accordance with Defendant's modified offers of judgment made pursuant to 12…”
Triad Bank, N.A. v. A & A Materials Co., 39 P.3d 820 (Okla. Civ. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “Triad Bank contends that it is a "defendant" for purposes of 12 O.S.1991 § 1101.1 because it defended A & A Materials' affirmative defense of equitable estoppel and it was a counter-defendant with respect to A & A Materials counterclaim.”
Schommer v. Communicate Now!, L.P., 324 P.3d 433 (Okla. Civ. App. 2014). “1, the Legislature mandated "[t}his section shall apply to all civil actions filed after the effective date of this act," see 12 O.S.Supp.1995 § 1101.1(D), which language has remained unchanged despite legislative additions to the section changing the subsection from (D) to (F)…”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1101.1(A) — 2 cases
Schommer v. Communicate Now!, L.P., 2014 OK CIV APP 38 (Okla. Civ. App. 2014). “, d/b/a Communication Solutions (Appellee), Plaintiffs Wayne Allen Schommer and Deborah Ann Schommer, husband and wife (collectively, the Schommers), appeal from a trial court judgment in their favor in accordance with Defendant's modified offers of judgment made pursuant to 12…”
Teasdale v. Foshee, 2024 OK CIV APP 10 (Okla. Civ. App. 2024).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1101.1(A)(1) — 1 case
Teasdale v. Foshee, 2024 OK CIV APP 10 (Okla. Civ. App. 2024).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1101.1(A)(2) — 1 case
Teasdale v. Foshee, 2024 OK CIV APP 10 (Okla. Civ. App. 2024).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1101.1(A)(3) — 1 case
Teasdale v. Foshee, 2024 OK CIV APP 10 (Okla. Civ. App. 2024).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1101.1(B) — 6 cases
Schommer v. Communicate Now!, L.P., 2014 OK CIV APP 38 (Okla. Civ. App. 2014). “, d/b/a Communication Solutions (Appellee), Plaintiffs Wayne Allen Schommer and Deborah Ann Schommer, husband and wife (collectively, the Schommers), appeal from a trial court judgment in their favor in accordance with Defendant's modified offers of judgment made pursuant to 12…”
Folsom v. Century Life Assurance Co., 2021 OK CIV APP 50 (Okla. Civ. App. 2021).
Teasdale v. Foshee, 2024 OK CIV APP 10 (Okla. Civ. App. 2024).
Cuyler v. BOKF, NA (N.D. Okla. 2020).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1101.1(B)(1) — 2 cases
Allen Farms, Inc. v. Broce Const. Co., Inc., 2006 OK CIV APP 36 (Okla. Civ. App. 2005). “Alen filed a post-judgment motion to assess attorney’s fees and costs as the prevailing party on the *855 contract claim under 12 O.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1101.1(B)(3) — 2 cases
Mittal v. Bluestem Emergency Med., 2019 OK CIV APP 65 (Okla. Civ. App. 2019).
Allen Farms, Inc. v. Broce Const. Co., Inc., 2006 OK CIV APP 36 (Okla. Civ. App. 2005). “Alen filed a post-judgment motion to assess attorney’s fees and costs as the prevailing party on the *855 contract claim under 12 O.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1101.1(D) — 3 cases
Marks v. Hentges (In Re Hentges), 373 B.R. 709 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 2007). “” 12 O.S. § 1101.1(D). Because this proceeding is an action to enforce a settlement arising out of an offer of judgment, Section 1101.”
Schommer v. Communicate Now!, L.P., 324 P.3d 433 (Okla. Civ. App. 2014). “1, the Legislature mandated "[t}his section shall apply to all civil actions filed after the effective date of this act," see 12 O.S.Supp.1995 § 1101.1(D), which language has remained unchanged despite legislative additions to the section changing the subsection from (D) to (F)…”
Schommer v. Communicate Now!, L.P., 2014 OK CIV APP 38 (Okla. Civ. App. 2014). “, d/b/a Communication Solutions (Appellee), Plaintiffs Wayne Allen Schommer and Deborah Ann Schommer, husband and wife (collectively, the Schommers), appeal from a trial court judgment in their favor in accordance with Defendant's modified offers of judgment made pursuant to 12…”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1101.1(G) — 1 case
Cuyler v. BOKF, NA (N.D. Okla. 2020).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.