Okla. Stat. » Title 12 — CIVIL PROCEDURE
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1148.1 (2026)

Jurisdiction - Forcible entry and detention - Joinder

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

of actions - Judgments no bar. The district court shall have jurisdiction to try all actions for the forcible entry and detention, or detention only, of real property, and claims for the collection of rent or damages to the premises, or claims arising under the Oklahoma Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, may be included in the same action, but other claims may not be included in the same action. A judgment in an action brought under this act shall be conclusive as to any issues adjudicated therein, but it shall not be a bar to any other action brought by either party. Added by Laws 1968, c. 172, § 1, eff. Jan. 13, 1969. Amended by Laws 1978, c. 257, § 36, eff. Oct. 1, 1978.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1974–2010 · leading case: Rowland v. State, 817 P.2d 263 (Okla. Crim. App. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rowland v. State, 817 P.2d 263 (Okla. Crim. App. 1991). “See also, 12 O.S.1981, § 1148.1 et seq. It is a summary proceeding for restoring to possession of land one who is wrongfully kept out or has been wrongfully deprived of the possession.”
In re Mims, 195 B.R. 472 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 1996). “See Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1148.1 . If in an action for forcible entry and detainer the landlord obtains judgment, Okla.”
Kerr-McGee Corp. v. Cutter, 564 P.2d 215 (Okla. 1977). · cites it 2× “Appellant asserts that the trial court was without jurisdiction because 12 O.S. § 1148.1 does not permit seeking possession of personal property or termination of collateral contractual agreements.”
Kellenberger v. Guar. Loan & Inv. Corp., 530 P.2d 574 (Okla. Civ. App. 1974). “12 O.S.1971, § 1148.1. In addition if the question o'f title is raised, the forcible entry and detainer action does not proceed before the special judge but as an action in ejectment before the proper division of the District Court.”
Prince Hall Vill. Apts. v. Braddy, 538 P.2d 603 (Okla. Civ. App. 1975). “” The statute the judge was referring to evidently was 12 O.S.1971 § 1148.1, et seq. Presumably he could not imply affirmatively the entitlement of a party to a jury trial from the negative language of § 1148.”
City Coll., Inc. v. Moore Sorrento, LLC, 2010 OK CIV APP 127, 246 P.3d 726. · cites it 2× “¶ 18 Oklahoma's "Forcible Entry and Detainer" statutes begin at 12 O.S.2001 § 1148.1, which provides in part: The district court shall have jurisdiction to try all actions for the forcible entry and detention .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.