Okla. Stat. » Title 12 — CIVIL PROCEDURE
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1277.7 (2026)

Renumbered as § 118 of Title 43 by Laws 1989, c. 333, §

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1, eff. Nov. 1, 1989.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1989–1993 · leading case: Mocnik v. Mocnik, 838 P.2d 500 (Okla. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mocnik v. Mocnik, 838 P.2d 500 (Okla. 1992). · cites it 2× “Subsection 18 of 12 O.S.Supp. 1989, § 1277.7 states that "[T]he court may make adjustments to child support guidelines for periods of extended visitation.”
Archer v. Archer, 813 P.2d 1059 (Okla. Civ. App. 1991). “Husband claims the trial court should have *1060 based any award of child support in excess of the top amount in the Child Support Guidelines (Guidelines), 12 O.S.Supp.1988 §§ 1277.7 and 1277.8 (renumbered as 43 O.”
Manzanares v. Manzanares, 769 P.2d 156 (Okla. 1989). · cites it 2× “Since that time the Legislature has enacted statutes which also promulgate child support guidelines, 12 O.S.Supp.1988 §§ 1277.7, 1277.8 and 1277.”
State ex rel. Huffman v. Robertson, 853 P.2d 249 (Okla. Civ. App. 1993). “See 12 O.S.Supp.1988 § 1277.7, now 43 O.S. 1991 § 118.”
Ford v. Ford, 840 P.2d 36 (Okla. Civ. App. 1992). “In adopting the Child Support Guidelines 12 O.S.Supp.1988 §§ 1277.7 and 1277.8, the Legislature devised a scheme which took into account both the presumed needs of the children, and the parties’ ability to pay.”
Pharaoh v. Pharaoh, 865 P.2d 1279 (Okla. Civ. App. 1993). “12 O.S.Supp.1988 § 1277.7, now renumbered 43 O.”
McKee v. McKee, 820 P.2d 1362 (Okla. Civ. App. 1991). “12 O.S.Supp.1988 §§ 1277.7, 1277.8 and 1277.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1277.7(19) — 1 case
Manzanares v. Manzanares, 769 P.2d 156 (Okla. 1989). “Since that time the Legislature has enacted statutes which also promulgate child support guidelines, 12 O.S.Supp.1988 §§ 1277.7, 1277.8 and 1277.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.