Okla. Stat. » Title 12 — CIVIL PROCEDURE
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1701.01 (2026)

Repealed by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 32, eff. Nov. 1,

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1984.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1973–1980 · leading case: Wright v. Keiser, 568 P.2d 1262 (Okla. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wright v. Keiser, 568 P.2d 1262 (Okla. 1977). “There is also thought to be a third test appearing in recent decisions that occupies a middle ground between the two.”
ABC Drilling Co., Inc. v. Hughes Grp., 609 P.2d 763 (Okla. 1980). “We reject the appellee’s contention that the foreign corporation, by doing business within the state, (as the judgment roll establishes) and failing to domesticate, can be estopped to deny compliance with the domestication statutes which would establish the Secretary of State as…”
Carmack v. Chem. Bank New York Trust Co., 536 P.2d 897 (Okla. 1975). “1971 § 187 and the Uniform Interstate and International Procedures Act 12 O.S.1971 § 1701.01 et seq. (UIIP) Chemical made a special appearance to deny the jurisdiction of the Oklahoma Court.”
Yankee Metal Prods. Co. v. Dist. Court of Oklahoma Cnty., Seventh Jud. Dist., 528 P.2d 311 (Okla. 1974). “under 12 O.S.1971, § 1701.01 et seq. The application to assume original jurisdiction is granted; writ of prohibition is denied.”
World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 585 P.2d 351 (Okla. 1978). “Woodson, from exercising personal jurisdiction over the petitioners, through service under the Uniform Interstate and International Procedure Act, as adopted in Oklahoma at 12 O.S.1971, §§ 1701.01 et seq., commonly referred to as the Oklahoma Long-Arm Statute.”
Precision Polymers, Inc. v. Nelson, 512 P.2d 811 (Okla. 1973). “1971, § 187; and 12 O.S.1971, § 1701.01 et seq., sometimes referred to as our “Long Arm” statutes.”
Morgan v. Atwell, 569 P.2d 529 (Okla. Civ. App. 1977). · cites it 2× “1975), that the act (12 O.S.1971, § 1701.01 et seq.) was intended to extend the.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.