Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1702.01 (2026)
Repealed by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 32, eff. Nov. 1,
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
1984.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1968–1979 · leading case: Architectural Bldg. Components Corp. v. Comfort, 528 P.2d 307 (Okla. 1974).
Architectural Bldg. Components Corp. v. Comfort, 528 P.2d 307 (Okla. 1974). “When Petitioner refused to pay for the merchandise an action was filed in the Tulsa County District Court and service was had by mail under 12 O.S.1971 § 1702.01(a)(3); proof of service was made as required by 12 O.”
Pittman v. Compton, 277 F. Supp. 772 (N.D. Okla. 1968). “04 and the proper methods of effecting service are specified in 12 O.S. § 1702.01. Among these methods is “personal delivery in the manner prescribed for service within this state;” 12 O.”
Combs v. Chambers, 283 F. Supp. 295 (N.D. Okla. 1968). “12 O.S. § 1702.01(a) (1). Fraud is a tort.”
Morgan v. Atwell, 569 P.2d 529 (Okla. Civ. App. 1977). “The statute, 12 O.S.1971, § 1702.01(a)(3) states service may be made “by any form of mail addressed to the person to be served and requiring a return receipt.”
McConnell v. Wier, 596 P.2d 547 (Okla. 1979). “) Our Legislature has made provisions for the manner of obtaining service outside our state in 12 O.S.1971, § 1702.01: “(a) When the law of this state authorizes service outside this state, the service may be made (5) as directed by the court.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1702.01(a): 2 cases
Pittman v. Compton, 277 F. Supp. 772 (N.D. Okla. 1968). “04 and the proper methods of effecting service are specified in 12 O.S. § 1702.01. Among these methods is “personal delivery in the manner prescribed for service within this state;” 12 O.”
Combs v. Chambers, 283 F. Supp. 295 (N.D. Okla. 1968). “12 O.S. § 1702.01(a) (1). Fraud is a tort.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1702.01(a)(3): 2 cases
Architectural Bldg. Components Corp. v. Comfort, 528 P.2d 307 (Okla. 1974). “When Petitioner refused to pay for the merchandise an action was filed in the Tulsa County District Court and service was had by mail under 12 O.S.1971 § 1702.01(a)(3); proof of service was made as required by 12 O.”
Morgan v. Atwell, 569 P.2d 529 (Okla. Civ. App. 1977). “The statute, 12 O.S.1971, § 1702.01(a)(3) states service may be made “by any form of mail addressed to the person to be served and requiring a return receipt.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 1702.01(b): 2 cases
Architectural Bldg. Components Corp. v. Comfort, 528 P.2d 307 (Okla. 1974). “When Petitioner refused to pay for the merchandise an action was filed in the Tulsa County District Court and service was had by mail under 12 O.S.1971 § 1702.01(a)(3); proof of service was made as required by 12 O.”
Morgan v. Atwell, 569 P.2d 529 (Okla. Civ. App. 1977). “The statute, 12 O.S.1971, § 1702.01(a)(3) states service may be made “by any form of mail addressed to the person to be served and requiring a return receipt.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.