and appealable orders.
A. After the granting of a judgment, decree or appealable order, it shall be reduced to writing in conformance with Section 696.3 of this title, signed by the court, and filed with the court clerk. The court may direct counsel for any party to the action to prepare a draft for the signature of the court, in which event, the court may prescribe procedures for the preparation and timely filing of the judgment, decree or appealable order, including, but not limited to, the time within which it is to be submitted to the court. If a written judgment, decree or appealable order is not submitted to the court by the party directed to do so within the time prescribed by the court, then any other party may reduce it to writing and submit it to the court. B. A file-stamped copy of every judgment, decree, or appealable order shall be served upon all parties, including those parties who are in default for failure to appear in the action, by the counsel for a party or party who prepared it, or by a person designated by the trial court, promptly and no later than three (3) days after it is filed. The service shall be done in the manner provided in Section 2005 of this title for the service of papers, and a certificate of service must be filed with the court clerk. If the judgment, decree or appealable order was prepared by the court, the court may direct a bailiff, court clerk or party to perform the service and certificate of service required by this subsection. In cases in which a party has failed to appear in the action, it shall be sufficient to mail a file-stamped copy of the judgment, decree or appealable order by first-class mail to the party’s last-known address, or if the service of process was on a registered agent, to the address of the registered agent. No mailing is required to a party who has failed to appear in the action if that party was served by publication. C. In any probate, guardianship, or conservatorship proceeding commenced on or after October 1, 1996, where a party, heir, devisee, legatee, or other interested party or representative of a party has received notice of a hearing which resulted in the issuance of a judgment, decree, or appealable order and did not file an entry of appearance, no further service of any judgment, decree, or appealable order shall be required to be sent to such party, heir, devisee, legatee, or other interested party or representative of a party, unless otherwise specifically required by law. No certificate of service shall be required to be filed where no party, heir, devisee, legatee, or other interested party, or representative of a party has filed an entry of appearance. D. The filing with the court clerk of a written judgment, decree or appealable order, prepared in conformance with Section 696.3 of this title and signed by the court, shall be a jurisdictional prerequisite to the commencement of an appeal. The following shall not constitute a judgment, decree or appealable
order: A minute entry; verdict; informal statement of the proceedings and relief awarded, including, but not limited to, a letter to a party or parties indicating the ruling or instructions for preparing the judgment, decree or appealable order. E. A judgment, decree or appealable order, whether interlocutory or final, shall not be enforceable in whole or in part unless or until it is signed by the court and filed; except that the adjudication of any issue shall be enforceable when pronounced by the court in the following actions: divorce; separate maintenance; annulment; post-decree matrimonial proceedings; paternity; custody; adoption; termination of parental rights; mental health; guardianship; juvenile matters; habeas corpus proceedings; or proceedings for temporary restraining orders, temporary injunctions, permanent injunctions, conservatorship, probate proceedings, special executions in foreclosure actions, quiet title actions, partition proceedings or contempt citations. The time for appeal shall not begin to run until a written judgment, decree or appealable order, prepared in conformance with Section 696.3 of this title, is filed with the court clerk, regardless of whether the judgment, decree, or appealable order is effective when pronounced or when it is filed. F. The preparation of orders, decisions and the taking of appeals from the Office of Administrative Hearings: Child Support shall be governed by the provisions of Title 56 of the Oklahoma Statutes. G. The preparation of orders, decisions and awards and the taking of appeals in workers' compensation cases shall be governed by the provisions of Title 85 of the Oklahoma Statutes. Added by Laws 1993, c. 351, § 9, eff. Oct. 1, 1993. Amended by Laws 1997, c. 102, § 2, eff. May 1, 1997; Laws 1997, c. 239, § 4, emerg. eff. May 23, 1997; Laws 2007, c. 12, § 2, eff. Nov. 1, 2007; Laws 2007, c. 41, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 2007.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
64
cases (
22 in the last 5 years), 1994–2025 · leading case:
Bushert v. Hughes, 912 P.2d 334 (Okla. 1996).
Bushert v. Hughes, 912 P.2d 334 (Okla. 1996).
· cites it 28× “12 O.S.Supp.1993 § 696.2. The trial court is given statutory authority over the preparation and time to file the judgment.”
Mansell v. City of Lawton, 877 P.2d 1120 (Okla. 1994).
· cites it 11× “12 O.S.Supp. 1993 §§ 696.2, 696.3. This minute entry is in a form that makes it not an appealable order.”
McMillian v. Holcomb, 907 P.2d 1034 (Okla. 1995).
· cites it 10× “" 12 O.S.Supp. 1993 § 696.2(A). An editorial commentary to this section states that "It is anticipated the past practice of assigning the preparation of the journal entry to the attorney for the prevailing party will continue to be followed.”
Corbit v. Williams, 897 P.2d 1129 (Okla. 1995).
· cites it 14× “[22] The terms of 12 O.S.Supp. 1993 § 696.2(A) provide in pertinent part: "After the granting of a judgment, decree or appealable order, it shall be reduced to writing .”
Aven v. Reeh, 878 P.2d 1069 (Okla. 1994).
· cites it 10× “The entire court file is before us, and its examination shows that no instrument has been filed that meets the requirements of 12 O.S.Supp. 1993 § 696.3. [3] Such a filed instrument is a jurisdictional predicate to an appeal.”
Manning v. State Ex Rel. Dep't of Pub. Saf., 876 P.2d 667 (Okla. 1994).
· cites it 7× “351 (to be codified at 12 O.S.Supp. 1993 § 696.2), not in force at the time of the appealable event in this case, which provide in pertinent part: "The following shall not constitute a judgment, decree or appealable order: A minute entry.”
Marriage of Alexander v. Alexander, 2015 OK 52 (Okla. 2015).
· cites it 5× “The Court explained that the legislature, through 12 O.S.2011, § 696.2(D), 2 created a bright-line rule that a minute entry can never constitute a judgment, decree, or appeal-able order.”
Lucas v. Bishop, 890 P.2d 411 (Okla. 1995).
· cites it 11× “[22] The later-enacted provisions of 12 O.S.Supp. 1993 §§ 696.2 [23] and 696.3 [24] , which today govern the contents and filing of judgments, were not in force when judgment was entered in this case.”
Peoria Corp. v. Lemay, 895 P.2d 1340 (Okla. 1994).
· cites it 7× “Beginning October 1, 1993 the time to appeal does not begin to run until an appealable order or judgment conforming to 12 O.S.Supp. 1993 § 696.3 is filed with the Clerk of the District Court.”
In the Matter of the Guardianship of Berry, 2014 OK 56 (Okla. 2014).
· cites it 4× “For example, appealability based upon the form of an order may be found at 12 O.S.2011 § 696.2 (D): "... The filing with the court clerk of a written judgment, decree or appealable order, prepared in conformance with Section 696.”
Bank IV Oklahoma, N.A. v. Sw. Bank & Trust Co., 935 P.2d 323 (Okla. 1997).
· cites it 8× “Southwestern Bank argues on rehearing for the first time that the Rules of the Seventh Judicial District (Oklahoma County) "have expanded the statute [12 O.S.Supp.1993 § 696.2] [4] and mandated, in every instance, that the prevailing party" prepare the journal entry.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 696.2(A) — 13 cases
Bushert v. Hughes, 912 P.2d 334 (Okla. 1996).
“12 O.S.Supp.1993 § 696.2. The trial court is given statutory authority over the preparation and time to file the judgment.”
McMillian v. Holcomb, 907 P.2d 1034 (Okla. 1995).
“" 12 O.S.Supp. 1993 § 696.2(A). An editorial commentary to this section states that "It is anticipated the past practice of assigning the preparation of the journal entry to the attorney for the prevailing party will continue to be followed.”
Aven v. Reeh, 878 P.2d 1069 (Okla. 1994).
“The entire court file is before us, and its examination shows that no instrument has been filed that meets the requirements of 12 O.S.Supp. 1993 § 696.3. [3] Such a filed instrument is a jurisdictional predicate to an appeal.”
Corbit v. Williams, 897 P.2d 1129 (Okla. 1995).
“[22] The terms of 12 O.S.Supp. 1993 § 696.2(A) provide in pertinent part: "After the granting of a judgment, decree or appealable order, it shall be reduced to writing .”
Peoria Corp. v. Lemay, 895 P.2d 1340 (Okla. 1994).
“Beginning October 1, 1993 the time to appeal does not begin to run until an appealable order or judgment conforming to 12 O.S.Supp. 1993 § 696.3 is filed with the Clerk of the District Court.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 696.2(B) — 4 cases
Bushert v. Hughes, 912 P.2d 334 (Okla. 1996).
“12 O.S.Supp.1993 § 696.2. The trial court is given statutory authority over the preparation and time to file the judgment.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 696.2(C) — 7 cases
Corbit v. Williams, 897 P.2d 1129 (Okla. 1995).
“[22] The terms of 12 O.S.Supp. 1993 § 696.2(A) provide in pertinent part: "After the granting of a judgment, decree or appealable order, it shall be reduced to writing .”
McMillian v. Holcomb, 907 P.2d 1034 (Okla. 1995).
“" 12 O.S.Supp. 1993 § 696.2(A). An editorial commentary to this section states that "It is anticipated the past practice of assigning the preparation of the journal entry to the attorney for the prevailing party will continue to be followed.”
Mansell v. City of Lawton, 877 P.2d 1120 (Okla. 1994).
“12 O.S.Supp. 1993 §§ 696.2, 696.3. This minute entry is in a form that makes it not an appealable order.”
Aven v. Reeh, 878 P.2d 1069 (Okla. 1994).
“The entire court file is before us, and its examination shows that no instrument has been filed that meets the requirements of 12 O.S.Supp. 1993 § 696.3. [3] Such a filed instrument is a jurisdictional predicate to an appeal.”
Lucas v. Bishop, 890 P.2d 411 (Okla. 1995).
“[22] The later-enacted provisions of 12 O.S.Supp. 1993 §§ 696.2 [23] and 696.3 [24] , which today govern the contents and filing of judgments, were not in force when judgment was entered in this case.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 696.2(D) — 10 cases
Marriage of Alexander v. Alexander, 2015 OK 52 (Okla. 2015).
“The Court explained that the legislature, through 12 O.S.2011, § 696.2(D), 2 created a bright-line rule that a minute entry can never constitute a judgment, decree, or appeal-able order.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 696.2(E) — 5 cases
Marriage of Alexander v. Alexander, 2015 OK 52 (Okla. 2015).
“The Court explained that the legislature, through 12 O.S.2011, § 696.2(D), 2 created a bright-line rule that a minute entry can never constitute a judgment, decree, or appeal-able order.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 696.2(c) — 2 cases
Manning v. State Ex Rel. Dep't of Pub. Saf., 876 P.2d 667 (Okla. 1994).
“351 (to be codified at 12 O.S.Supp. 1993 § 696.2), not in force at the time of the appealable event in this case, which provide in pertinent part: "The following shall not constitute a judgment, decree or appealable order: A minute entry.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.