Okla. Stat. » Title 12 — CIVIL PROCEDURE
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 993 (2026)

Appeals from certain orders

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. When an order: 1. Discharges, vacates, or modifies or refuses to discharge, vacate, or modify an attachment; 2. Denies a temporary or permanent injunction, grants a temporary or permanent injunction except where granted at an ex parte hearing, or discharges, vacates, or modifies or refuses to discharge, vacate, or modify a temporary or permanent injunction; 3. Discharges, vacates, or modifies or refuses to discharge, vacate, or modify a provisional remedy which affects the substantial rights of a party; 4. Appoints a receiver except where the receiver was appointed at an ex parte hearing, refuses to appoint a receiver, or vacates or refuses to vacate the appointment of a receiver;

5. Directs the payment of money pendente lite except where granted at an ex parte hearing, refuses to direct the payment of money pendente lite, or vacates or refuses to vacate an order directing the payment of money pendente lite; 6. Certifies or refuses to certify an action to be maintained as a class action; 7. Denies a motion in a class action asserting lack of jurisdiction because an agency of this state has exclusive or primary jurisdiction of the action or a part of the action, or asserting that a party has failed to exhaust administrative remedies, but only if the class is subsequently certified and only as part of the appeal of the order certifying the class action; or 8. Grants a new trial or opens or vacates a judgment or order, the party aggrieved thereby may appeal the order to the Supreme Court without awaiting the final determination in said cause, by filing the petition in error and the record on appeal with the Supreme Court within thirty (30) days after the order prepared in conformance with Section 696.3 of this title, is filed with the court clerk. If the appellant did not prepare the order, and Section 696.2 of this title required a copy of the order to be mailed to the appellant, and the court records do not reflect the mailing of a copy of the order to the appellant within three (3) days, exclusive of weekends and holidays, after the filing of the order, the petition in error may be filed within thirty (30) days after the earliest date on which the court records show that a copy of the order was mailed to the appellant. The Supreme Court may extend the time for filing the record upon good cause shown. B. If the order discharges or modifies an attachment or temporary injunction and it becomes operative, the undertaking given upon the allowance of an attachment or temporary injunction shall stay the enforcement of said order and remain in full force until final order of discharge shall take effect. C. If a receiver shall be or has been appointed, upon the appellant filing an appeal bond, with sufficient sureties, in such sum as may have been required of the receiver by the court or a judge thereof, conditioned for the due prosecution of the appeal and the payment of all costs or damages that may accrue to the state or any officer or person by reason thereof, the authority of the receiver shall be suspended until the final determination of the appeal, and if the receiver has taken possession of any property, real or personal, it shall be returned and surrendered to the appellant upon the filing and approval of the bonds. Added by Laws 1970, c. 289, § 1, eff. July 1, 1970. Amended by Laws 1978, c. 245, § 8, eff. July 1, 1978; Laws 1984, c. 40, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 1984; Laws 1990, c. 251, § 14, eff. Jan. 1, 1991; Laws 1991, c. 251, § 17, eff. June 1, 1991; Laws 1993, c. 351, § 22, eff. Oct. 1, 1993; Laws 1996, c. 61, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 1996; Laws 1997, c.

102, § 8, eff. May 1, 1997; Laws 2013, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 10, § 2, emerg. eff. Sept. 10, 2013; Laws 2013, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 10, § 3, emerg. eff. Sept. 10, 2013; Laws 2013, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 23, § 2, emerg. eff. Sept. 10, 2013; Laws 2013, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 23, § 3, emerg. eff. Sept. 10, 2013. NOTE: Laws 2013, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 10, § 3 and Laws 2013, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 23, § 3 made identical amendments. NOTE: Laws 2009, c. 228, § 9 was held unconstitutional by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in the case of Douglas v. Cox Retirement Properties, Inc., 2013 OK 37, 302 P.2d 789 (Okla. 2013) and repealed by Laws 2013, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 10, § 1, emerg. eff. Sept. 10, 2013 and Laws 2013, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 23, § 1, emerg. eff. Sept. 10, 2013.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 62 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1973–2025 · leading case: Collier v. Reese, 2009 OK 86 (Okla. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Collier v. Reese, 2009 OK 86 (Okla. 2009). · cites it 8× “1991 § 952(b)(2)); (b) Discharge, vacate or modify or refuse to discharge, vacate or modify an attachment (12 O.S.Supp.1993 § 993(A)(1)); (c) Deny a temporary injunction, grant a temporary injunction except where granted at an ex parte hearing, or discharge, vacate or modify or…”
Conterez v. O'DONNELL, 2002 OK 67 (Okla. 2002). · cites it 3× “¶ 6 The plaintiff argues on certiorari that (a) his petition in error was timely filed because the express and implicit terms of 12 O.S.2001 § 993(A)(5) 4 give him the option either of taking an immediate appeal from that part of the April 25 order which refused to direct the…”
LCR, INC. v. Linwood Props., 918 P.2d 1388 (Okla. 1996). · cites it 2× “LY 6 ORDER IS NEITHER APPEALABLE BY RIGHT NOR ADVANCED FOR PREJUDGMENT REVIEW BY A LEGALLY ACCEPTABLE CERTIFICATION, LCR’S APPEAL MUST BE DISMISSED Since the July 6 memorial clearly is not appealable either as a final order or judgment in the case, 21 our next task is to…”
Whig Syndicate, Inc. v. Keyes, 836 P.2d 1283 (Okla. 1992). · cites it 3× “12 O.S.1984 § 993(A)(6). The language of the order that allows the suit to proceed as a class action is indeed less than clear as to the identity of the members of the class.”
Marshall Cnty. v. Homesales, Inc., 2014 OK 88 (Okla. 2014). · cites it 3× “7 We have jurisdiction to hear the appeal of the class certification order pursuant to Title 12 O.S.2011 § 993(A)(6). A party's standing may be raised at any time during the litigation.”
Powers v. Dist. Court of Tulsa Cnty., 2009 OK 91 (Okla. 2009). “1993 § 993(A)(5), by which orders directing the payment of money pendente lite are appealable, do not apply to temporary support orders or orders for the payment of temporary attorney fees in matrimonial cases. The latter are predicated on the general duty of parental or spousal…”
Salmonsen v. CGD, INC., 661 S.E.2d 81 (S.C. 2008). · cites it 2× “02(B)(5) (2005)(Ohio); Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 993 (A)(6) (2005) (Oklahoma); Or.”
Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Auth. v. City of Oklahoma City, 2005 OK 2 (Okla. 2005). “1991 § 952(b)(2))-" Title 12 O.S.2001 § 993 provides in pertinent part: "A.”
Pub. Serv. Co. of Oklahoma v. Home Builders Ass'n of Realtors, 554 P.2d 1181 (Okla. 1976). · cites it 2× “PSC timely appeals from the interlocutory order denying a temporary injunction pursuant to 12 O.S.1971 § 993(a) (2). 1 The typewritten portion of the conveyance provides: “Grantee in further consideration for the dedication of this easement agrees with Grantor, its successor and…”
Smith v. State Ex Rel. Bd. of Regents of Oklahoma State Univ., 846 P.2d 370 (Okla. 1993). · cites it 3× “The terms of 12 O.S.1991 § 993(A)(2) provide in part: "A.”
In the Matter of the Guardianship of Berry, 2014 OK 56 (Okla. 2014). · cites it 2× “9 12 O.S.2011 § 993 (as amended Laws 2013, 1st Ex.”
Hammonds v. Osteopathic Hosp. Founders Ass'n, 917 P.2d 6 (Okla. 1996). · cites it 2× “See the *8 controlling provisions of 12 O.S.1991 § 993(A)(5). 6 III BECAUSE SELLERS BROUGHT A MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL WITHIN TEN DAYS OF THE APPEALABLE ORDER’S ENTRY, APPEAL TIME STOOD EXTENDED AND HIS PETITION IN ERROR WAS TIMELY FILED The July 30, 1993 nisi prius memorial — which…”
Show all 62 citing cases →
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 993(6): 1 case
Bunch v. KMart Corp., 898 P.2d 170 (Okla. Civ. App. 1995).
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 993(A): 2 cases
LCR, INC. v. Linwood Props., 918 P.2d 1388 (Okla. 1996). “LY 6 ORDER IS NEITHER APPEALABLE BY RIGHT NOR ADVANCED FOR PREJUDGMENT REVIEW BY A LEGALLY ACCEPTABLE CERTIFICATION, LCR’S APPEAL MUST BE DISMISSED Since the July 6 memorial clearly is not appealable either as a final order or judgment in the case, 21 our next task is to…”
Breeding v. NJH Enter., LLC., 940 P.2d 502 (Okla. 1997).
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 993(A)(1): 4 cases
Collier v. Reese, 2009 OK 86 (Okla. 2009). “1991 § 952(b)(2)); (b) Discharge, vacate or modify or refuse to discharge, vacate or modify an attachment (12 O.S.Supp.1993 § 993(A)(1)); (c) Deny a temporary injunction, grant a temporary injunction except where granted at an ex parte hearing, or discharge, vacate or modify or…”
In Re: Amendment to Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.60, 2019 OK 64 (Okla. 2019).
In Re Amendment of Rule 1.60, Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules, 2023 OK 43 (Okla. 2023).
In Re Amendment of Rule 1.60, Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules, 2023 OK 43 (Okla. 2023).
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 993(A)(2): 8 cases
Smith v. State Ex Rel. Bd. of Regents of Oklahoma State Univ., 846 P.2d 370 (Okla. 1993). “The terms of 12 O.S.1991 § 993(A)(2) provide in part: "A.”
Collier v. Reese, 2009 OK 86 (Okla. 2009). “1991 § 952(b)(2)); (b) Discharge, vacate or modify or refuse to discharge, vacate or modify an attachment (12 O.S.Supp.1993 § 993(A)(1)); (c) Deny a temporary injunction, grant a temporary injunction except where granted at an ex parte hearing, or discharge, vacate or modify or…”
Coxcom, Inc. v. Oklahoma Secondary Schs. Athletic Ass'n, 2006 OK CIV APP 107 (Okla. Civ. App. 2006).
Thayne A. Hedges Reg'l Speech & Hearing Ctr., Inc. v. Baughman, 1998 OK CIV APP 122 (Okla. Civ. App. 1998).
Al-khouri v. Oklahoma Health Care Auth., 2018 OK CIV APP 10 (Okla. Civ. App. 2017).
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 993(A)(3): 5 cases
Collier v. Reese, 2009 OK 86 (Okla. 2009). “1991 § 952(b)(2)); (b) Discharge, vacate or modify or refuse to discharge, vacate or modify an attachment (12 O.S.Supp.1993 § 993(A)(1)); (c) Deny a temporary injunction, grant a temporary injunction except where granted at an ex parte hearing, or discharge, vacate or modify or…”
Bulard Air Servs. v. Brown Aviation, 2019 OK CIV APP 39 (Okla. Civ. App. 2019).
In Re: Amendment to Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.60, 2019 OK 64 (Okla. 2019).
In Re Amendment of Rule 1.60, Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules, 2023 OK 43 (Okla. 2023).
In Re Amendment of Rule 1.60, Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules, 2023 OK 43 (Okla. 2023).
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 993(A)(4): 5 cases
Collier v. Reese, 2009 OK 86 (Okla. 2009). “1991 § 952(b)(2)); (b) Discharge, vacate or modify or refuse to discharge, vacate or modify an attachment (12 O.S.Supp.1993 § 993(A)(1)); (c) Deny a temporary injunction, grant a temporary injunction except where granted at an ex parte hearing, or discharge, vacate or modify or…”
In Re: Amendment to Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.60, 2019 OK 64 (Okla. 2019).
In Re Amendment of Rule 1.60, Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules, 2023 OK 43 (Okla. 2023).
In Re Amendment of Rule 1.60, Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules, 2023 OK 43 (Okla. 2023).
Fansler v. Fansler, 287 P.3d 1028 (Okla. Civ. App. 2012).
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 993(A)(5): 12 cases
Conterez v. O'DONNELL, 2002 OK 67 (Okla. 2002). “¶ 6 The plaintiff argues on certiorari that (a) his petition in error was timely filed because the express and implicit terms of 12 O.S.2001 § 993(A)(5) 4 give him the option either of taking an immediate appeal from that part of the April 25 order which refused to direct the…”
Powers v. Dist. Court of Tulsa Cnty., 2009 OK 91 (Okla. 2009). “1993 § 993(A)(5), by which orders directing the payment of money pendente lite are appealable, do not apply to temporary support orders or orders for the payment of temporary attorney fees in matrimonial cases. The latter are predicated on the general duty of parental or spousal…”
Hammonds v. Osteopathic Hosp. Founders Ass'n, 917 P.2d 6 (Okla. 1996). “See the *8 controlling provisions of 12 O.S.1991 § 993(A)(5). 6 III BECAUSE SELLERS BROUGHT A MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL WITHIN TEN DAYS OF THE APPEALABLE ORDER’S ENTRY, APPEAL TIME STOOD EXTENDED AND HIS PETITION IN ERROR WAS TIMELY FILED The July 30, 1993 nisi prius memorial — which…”
Collier v. Reese, 2009 OK 86 (Okla. 2009). “1991 § 952(b)(2)); (b) Discharge, vacate or modify or refuse to discharge, vacate or modify an attachment (12 O.S.Supp.1993 § 993(A)(1)); (c) Deny a temporary injunction, grant a temporary injunction except where granted at an ex parte hearing, or discharge, vacate or modify or…”
Teachers Ins. & Annuity Ass'n of Am. v. Oklahoma Tower Assocs. Ltd. P'ship, 798 P.2d 618 (Okla. 1990).
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 993(A)(6): 14 cases
Collier v. Reese, 2009 OK 86 (Okla. 2009). “1991 § 952(b)(2)); (b) Discharge, vacate or modify or refuse to discharge, vacate or modify an attachment (12 O.S.Supp.1993 § 993(A)(1)); (c) Deny a temporary injunction, grant a temporary injunction except where granted at an ex parte hearing, or discharge, vacate or modify or…”
Whig Syndicate, Inc. v. Keyes, 836 P.2d 1283 (Okla. 1992). “12 O.S.1984 § 993(A)(6). The language of the order that allows the suit to proceed as a class action is indeed less than clear as to the identity of the members of the class.”
Marshall Cnty. v. Homesales, Inc., 2014 OK 88 (Okla. 2014). “7 We have jurisdiction to hear the appeal of the class certification order pursuant to Title 12 O.S.2011 § 993(A)(6). A party's standing may be raised at any time during the litigation.”
Burgess v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc., 2006 OK 66 (Okla. 2006).
Wilson v. Harlow, 860 P.2d 793 (Okla. 1993).
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 993(C): 1 case
Truett v. Freedom Leaf, 2021 OK CIV APP 26 (Okla. Civ. App. 2021).
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 993(a): 1 case
Pub. Serv. Co. of Oklahoma v. Home Builders Ass'n of Realtors, 554 P.2d 1181 (Okla. 1976). “PSC timely appeals from the interlocutory order denying a temporary injunction pursuant to 12 O.S.1971 § 993(a) (2). 1 The typewritten portion of the conveyance provides: “Grantee in further consideration for the dedication of this easement agrees with Grantor, its successor and…”
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 993(a)(2): 1 case
Johnson v. Ward, 541 P.2d 182 (Okla. 1975).
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 993(a)(4): 1 case
Com. Bank of Kansas City, N.A. v. Chadwell, 635 P.2d 609 (Okla. 1981).
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 993(a)(6): 1 case
Perry v. Meek, 618 P.2d 934 (Okla. 1980).
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 993(c): 1 case
Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Owens, 555 P.2d 879 (Okla. 1976).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.