Okla. Stat. » Title 12A — UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 2-608 (2026)

Revocation of Acceptance in Whole or in Part

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) The buyer may revoke his acceptance of a lot or commercial unit whose nonconformity substantially impairs its value to him if he has accepted it (a) on the reasonable assumption that its nonconformity would be cured and it has not been seasonably cured; or (b) without discovery of such nonconformity if his acceptance was reasonably induced either by the difficulty of discovery before acceptance or by the seller's assurances. (2) Revocation of acceptance must occur within a reasonable time after the buyer discovers or should have discovered the ground for it and before any substantial change in condition of the goods which is not caused by their own defects. It is not effective until the buyer notifies the seller of it. (3) A buyer who so revokes has the same rights and duties with regard to the goods involved as if he had rejected them. Laws 1961, p. 93, § 2-608.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1984–1998 · leading case: Murray v. D & J Motor Co., 1998 OK CIV APP 69, 958 P.2d 823.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Murray v. D & J Motor Co., 1998 OK CIV APP 69, 958 P.2d 823. · cites it 4× “She sought recovery on three theories: (1) revocation under the Uniform Commercial Code, 12A O.S.1991, § 2-608 (“UCC”); (2) fraud; and (3) violation of the Oklahoma Consumer Protection Act, 15 O.”
Cmi Corp. v. Leemar Steel Co., 733 F.2d 1410 (10th Cir. 1984). · cites it 2× “1979); Okla.Stat.Ann. tit. 12A, § 2-608(3). With either a proper rejection or revocation, title to the goods revests with the seller, Joseph T.”
W. Paper Co. v. Bilby, 783 P.2d 980 (Okla. Civ. App. 1989). “Western Paper cites 12A O.S.1981 § 2-608(2), for the rule that a buyer cannot revoke acceptance after “any substantial change in condition of the goods.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 2-608(2): 1 case
W. Paper Co. v. Bilby, 783 P.2d 980 (Okla. Civ. App. 1989). “Western Paper cites 12A O.S.1981 § 2-608(2), for the rule that a buyer cannot revoke acceptance after “any substantial change in condition of the goods.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 2-608(3): 1 case
Cmi Corp. v. Leemar Steel Co., 733 F.2d 1410 (10th Cir. 1984). “1979); Okla.Stat.Ann. tit. 12A, § 2-608(3). With either a proper rejection or revocation, title to the goods revests with the seller, Joseph T.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 2-608(l)(a): 1 case
Cmi Corp. v. Leemar Steel Co., 733 F.2d 1410 (10th Cir. 1984). “1979); Okla.Stat.Ann. tit. 12A, § 2-608(3). With either a proper rejection or revocation, title to the goods revests with the seller, Joseph T.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.