Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-302 (2026)
Repealed by Laws 2000, c. 371, § 185, eff. July 1,
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
2001.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23
cases, 1970–2004 · leading case: Wheels, Inc. v. Otasco, Inc. (In Re Otasco, Inc.), 111 B.R. 976 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1990).
Wheels, Inc. v. Otasco, Inc. (In Re Otasco, Inc.), 111 B.R. 976 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1990). “These provisions may be summarized as follows: under Oklahoma law, security interests in motor vehicles are perfected not by filing financing statements pursuant to 12A O.S. § 9-302(1), 9-401 et seq., but only by delivery of a lien entry form and payment of the required fee to…”
North Texas Prod. Credit Ass'n v. McCurtain Cnty. Nat'l Bank, 222 F.3d 800 (10th Cir. 2000). “” Thus, the 1993 Financing Statement caused NTPCA’s security interest in the cattle pledged as collateral for the Note to be perfected pursuant to Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 12A, § 9-302. The November 3, 1994 loan was to enable the Clarks to purchase 1,688 head of cattle for…”
Sec. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. of Norman v. Dentsply Prof'l Plan, 617 P.2d 1340 (Okla. 1980). “12A O.S.1971 § 9-302. 4 . First State Bank in Talihina v.”
In Re Hembree, 635 P.2d 601 (Okla. 1981). “Further, the filing provisions of the UCC have been expressly rendered inapplicable in this instance by 12A O.S.Supp. 1979 § 9-302 (3)(3)(b)(4). [3] Courts have consistently held that intent controls over form in creation of security interests, [4] and that the policy of liberal…”
Stainer v. Bank of Tulsa (In Re Haning), 35 B.R. 242 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1983). “12A O.S. § 9-302 itself provides that “(3) The filing of a financing statement otherwise required by this Article is not .”
Liberty Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City v. Garcia, 686 P.2d 303 (Okla. Civ. App. 1984). “See also 12A O.S.1981 § 9-302(3). The Oklahoma Legislature has adopted the “race diligence” approach in both the Uniform Commercial Code and the Certificates of Title provisions of Title 47.”
In Re Foster, 611 P.2d 232 (Okla. 1980). “834, 858 (1977) where he stated: ... [When State I is a certificate of title state and A moves the vehicle with an appropriately noted certificate of title into a non-title or filing state, Section 9-103(4) clearly applies and continues the perfection of C-1 (Initial First…”
Mitchell Coach Mfg. Co. v. Stephens, 19 F. Supp. 2d 1227 (N.D. Okla. 1998). “See 12A O.S. § 9-302; Tex.Bus. & Com.Code § 9.”
Bank of Oklahoma, City Plaza v. Martin, 744 P.2d 218 (Okla. Civ. App. 1987). “Furthermore, in citing the saving provision of article nine, Western overlooks the specific language of 12A O.S.1981 § 9-302(3)(a) (emphasis added), which states: The filing of a financing statement otherwise required by this article is not necessary or effective to perfect a…”
Am. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Nat'l Cash Register Co., 473 P.2d 234 (Okla. 1970). “Title 12A O.S.1961, § 9-302, requires that a financing statement must be filed to perfect all security interests except in certain instances that are not applicable in the present case.”
In Re Gray, 40 B.R. 429 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 1984). “It is the contention of Norman Bank that the perfection of the security interest is properly accomplished by way of filing a financing statement pursuant to 12A O.S. 1981 § 9-302. This statute is Oklahoma’s version of the Uniform Commercial Code (hereinafter “U.”
Woodson v. Cmty. Bank & Trust Co. (In Re B & S Motor Freight, Inc.), 59 B.R. 259 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1986). “In particular § 9-302(3)(c) states: (3) the filing of a financing statement otherwise required by this article is not necessary or effective to perfect a security interest in property subject to: (c) a certificate of title of another jurisdiction pursuant to the provisions of…”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-302(1) — 3 cases
Wheels, Inc. v. Otasco, Inc. (In Re Otasco, Inc.), 111 B.R. 976 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1990). “These provisions may be summarized as follows: under Oklahoma law, security interests in motor vehicles are perfected not by filing financing statements pursuant to 12A O.S. § 9-302(1), 9-401 et seq., but only by delivery of a lien entry form and payment of the required fee to…”
Woodson v. Cmty. Bank & Trust Co. (In Re B & S Motor Freight, Inc.), 59 B.R. 259 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1986). “In particular § 9-302(3)(c) states: (3) the filing of a financing statement otherwise required by this article is not necessary or effective to perfect a security interest in property subject to: (c) a certificate of title of another jurisdiction pursuant to the provisions of…”
LMS Holding Co. v. Core-Mark Mid-Continent, Inc., 50 F.3d 1520 (10th Cir. 1995).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-302(1)(d) — 1 case
Earls v. Greenpoint Credit (10th Cir. 2000).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-302(1)(i) — 2 cases
In Re Gregory, 2004 OK 57 (Okla. 2001).
Earls v. Greenpoint Credit (10th Cir. 2000).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-302(3) — 2 cases
Wheels, Inc. v. Otasco, Inc. (In Re Otasco, Inc.), 111 B.R. 976 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1990). “These provisions may be summarized as follows: under Oklahoma law, security interests in motor vehicles are perfected not by filing financing statements pursuant to 12A O.S. § 9-302(1), 9-401 et seq., but only by delivery of a lien entry form and payment of the required fee to…”
Liberty Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City v. Garcia, 686 P.2d 303 (Okla. Civ. App. 1984). “See also 12A O.S.1981 § 9-302(3). The Oklahoma Legislature has adopted the “race diligence” approach in both the Uniform Commercial Code and the Certificates of Title provisions of Title 47.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-302(3)(3)(b)(4) — 2 cases
In Re Hembree, 635 P.2d 601 (Okla. 1981). “Further, the filing provisions of the UCC have been expressly rendered inapplicable in this instance by 12A O.S.Supp. 1979 § 9-302 (3)(3)(b)(4). [3] Courts have consistently held that intent controls over form in creation of security interests, [4] and that the policy of liberal…”
Woodson v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp., 635 P.2d 601 (Okla. 1981).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-302(3)(a) — 1 case
Bank of Oklahoma, City Plaza v. Martin, 744 P.2d 218 (Okla. Civ. App. 1987). “Furthermore, in citing the saving provision of article nine, Western overlooks the specific language of 12A O.S.1981 § 9-302(3)(a) (emphasis added), which states: The filing of a financing statement otherwise required by this article is not necessary or effective to perfect a…”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-302(3)(b) — 3 cases
Wheels, Inc. v. Otasco, Inc. (In Re Otasco, Inc.), 111 B.R. 976 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1990). “These provisions may be summarized as follows: under Oklahoma law, security interests in motor vehicles are perfected not by filing financing statements pursuant to 12A O.S. § 9-302(1), 9-401 et seq., but only by delivery of a lien entry form and payment of the required fee to…”
Stainer v. Bank of Tulsa (In Re Haning), 35 B.R. 242 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1983). “12A O.S. § 9-302 itself provides that “(3) The filing of a financing statement otherwise required by this Article is not .”
Woodson v. . Bank of Oklahoma, Claremore (In re Coleman), 55 B.R. 263 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1985).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-302(4) — 2 cases
Wheels, Inc. v. Otasco, Inc. (In Re Otasco, Inc.), 111 B.R. 976 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1990). “These provisions may be summarized as follows: under Oklahoma law, security interests in motor vehicles are perfected not by filing financing statements pursuant to 12A O.S. § 9-302(1), 9-401 et seq., but only by delivery of a lien entry form and payment of the required fee to…”
Transp. Acceptance Corp. v. Crosby (In re Crosby), 23 B.R. 514 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1982).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-302(l)(h) — 1 case
Wheels, Inc. v. Otasco, Inc. (In Re Otasco, Inc.), 111 B.R. 976 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1990). “These provisions may be summarized as follows: under Oklahoma law, security interests in motor vehicles are perfected not by filing financing statements pursuant to 12A O.S. § 9-302(1), 9-401 et seq., but only by delivery of a lien entry form and payment of the required fee to…”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-302(l)(i) — 1 case
Manchester v. Green Tree Fin. Servicing Corp., 97 P.3d 639 (Okla. 2004).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.