Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-304 (2026)
Repealed by Laws 2000, c. 371, § 185, eff. July 1,
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
2001.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1975–1993 · leading case: Morton Booth Co. v. Tiara Furniture, Inc., 564 P.2d 210 (Okla. 1977).
Morton Booth Co. v. Tiara Furniture, Inc., 564 P.2d 210 (Okla. 1977). “12A O.S.1971, § 9-304. There is no evidence to indicate that Booth ever gave Banks notice of its claim to the goods.”
In re Cripps, 31 B.R. 541 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 1983). “Comment 1 to 12A O.S. 1981 § 9-304, § 9-305. “Even if the creditor collects ledger cards, journals, computer print-outs, sales slips and any other items believed to represent receivables he will not by those acts perfect a security interest in *544 accounts.”
Wheels, Inc. v. Otasco, Inc. (In re Otasco, Inc.), 111 B.R. 976 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1990). “Those opinions do not mention the ambiguous language of the Motor Vehicle Act itself, nor take account of either the express provisions of 12A O.S. § 9-304(2) or the negative implication of 12A O.”
Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Hastie, 2 F.3d 1042 (10th Cir. 1993). “4 See Okla.Stat.Ann. tit. 12A, § 8-207(1) (West Supp.”
Bowles v. City Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City, 537 P.2d 1219 (Okla. Civ. App. 1975). “12A O.S.1971 § 9-304. 1 (It is true Federal Bank might proceed against PreFab for wrongfully disposing of assets by selling stock without Federal Bank’s ap *1223 proval, but that is quite beside the issues before us.”
Patco, Inc. v. Hammond (In re Hammond), 31 B.R. 517 (W.D. Okla. 1983). “Perfection of a security interest in an instrument is governed by 12A O.S.1981 § 9-304(1) which provides: “[a] security interest in money or instruments, other than instruments which constitute part of chattel paper, can be perfected only by the secured party’s taking possession…”
Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-304(1): 2 cases
Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Hastie, 2 F.3d 1042 (10th Cir. 1993). “4 See Okla.Stat.Ann. tit. 12A, § 8-207(1) (West Supp.”
Patco, Inc. v. Hammond (In re Hammond), 31 B.R. 517 (W.D. Okla. 1983). “Perfection of a security interest in an instrument is governed by 12A O.S.1981 § 9-304(1) which provides: “[a] security interest in money or instruments, other than instruments which constitute part of chattel paper, can be perfected only by the secured party’s taking possession…”
Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-304(2): 1 case
Wheels, Inc. v. Otasco, Inc. (In re Otasco, Inc.), 111 B.R. 976 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1990). “Those opinions do not mention the ambiguous language of the Motor Vehicle Act itself, nor take account of either the express provisions of 12A O.S. § 9-304(2) or the negative implication of 12A O.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.