Okla. Stat. » Title 17 — CORPORATION COMMISSION
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 17, § 252 (2026)

Monitoring of fuel adjustment clauses

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Whenever the Commission approves a fuel adjustment clause pursuant to this act, the clause shall apply to all similar public utilities affected by such increased costs. In addition, the Commission shall continually monitor and oversee the application of the fuel adjustment clauses. The Commission shall hold a public hearing thereon whenever it deems it necessary, but no less frequently than once every twelve (12) months. If the Commission finds that the charges or credits are not based upon the actual prices paid for fuel, purchased gas or purchased power, or are not properly computed in accordance with the applicable adjustment clause, it shall recompute the charges or credits and shall direct the public utility to take such action as may be required to insure that the charges or credits properly reflect the actual prices paid for fuel, purchased gas or purchased power and are properly computed in accordance with the applicable adjustment clause for the applicable period. The fuel adjustment clause may be amended upon a finding of changed circumstances by the Commission but shall not be wholly discontinued or suspended except by order of the Commission after notice and hearings for the utilities affected have been rendered. Laws 1977, c. 252, § 3, emerg. eff. June 15, 1977; Laws 1991, c. 332, § 2, eff. July 1, 1991.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1980–1988 · leading case: Lease Lights, Inc. v. Pub. Serv. Co. of Oklahoma, 849 F.2d 1330 (10th Cir. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lease Lights, Inc. v. Pub. Serv. Co. of Oklahoma, 849 F.2d 1330 (10th Cir. 1988). “Okla.Stat. tit. 17, §§ 252, 263. We hold that these constitutional and statutory provisions indicate a clear intent by the state to supplant the market for leased outdoor lighting with active regulation by the Commission.”
In re Reg. of Automatic Rate Adjustment Clauses, 608 P.2d 544 (Okla. 1980). “On September 18, 1979, the Commission conducted a public hearing in accordance with the requirements of 17 O.S.Supp.1977 §§ 252, 259. At this hearing, the Attorney *545 General objected to Commission Rules 6 and 12 2 as being in conflict with the statutes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.