Okla. Stat. » Title 19 — COUNTIES AND COUNTY OFFICERS
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 19, § 863.1 (2026)

City and county planning and zoning - Cooperative

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

planning commission - Board of adjustment. For the purpose of cooperating with the State of Oklahoma in conserving the natural resources of the state, and in promoting the health, safety, peace, morals and general welfare of the people of the state, there may be provided in all applicable counties of the state, city and county planning and zoning, in the manner herein provided, and for that purpose there are hereby created in each of such applicable counties a city-county cooperative planning commission and a county board of adjustment with the respective powers and duties as set out in this act. Added by Laws 1955, p. 164, § 1, emerg. eff. June 3, 1955.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1957–2016 · leading case: Mustang Run Wind Proj., LLC v. Osage Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2016 OK 113.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mustang Run Wind Proj., LLC v. Osage Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2016 OK 113. “536, 539. Similarly, the 1951 statute was repealed by H.”
Glaser v. Tulsa Metro. Area Plan. Comm'n, 360 P.2d 247 (Okla. 1961). “The Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning ■Commission was created under the provisions of Title 19 O.S.Supp.1955, § 863.1 et seq., for the purpose of bringing about a ■coordinated physical development in accordance with the present and future needs of the city and a five-mile…”
City of Tulsa v. Elias, 319 P.2d 316 (Okla. Crim. App. 1957). “Under the provisions of 19 O.S.1955 § 863.1, a prerequisite for the Municipal Court’s exercise of jurisdiction to the five-mile perimeter is that the city must bring itself within the provisions of the city and county zoning statute by adopting, amending, extending, and adding…”
Holtzen v. Tulsa Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2004 OK CIV APP 74, 97 P.3d 1150. “22 states: *1154 A judicial review in the District Court may be had of any ruling, regulation, interpretation, order, requirement, refusal, permit, approval, or decision made under the terms of this act [19 O.S.2001 § 863.1 et seq.], when such action is alleged to be arbitrary,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.