Okla. Stat. » Title 19 — COUNTIES AND COUNTY OFFICERS
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 19, § 866.24 (2026)

Appeals to district court

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

An appeal to the district court from any decision, ruling, judgment, or order of said county board of adjustment may be taken by any person or persons, firm or corporation, jointly or severally, aggrieved thereby, or any department, board or official of government by filing with the clerk of said board within ten (10) days a notice of such appeal. No bond shall be required for such appeal, but costs may be required in the district court as in other cases. Upon filing of such notice, the clerk of said board shall forthwith transmit to the clerk of the district court the originals or certified copies of all papers constituting the record in such case, together with the order, judgment or decisions of said board. Said cause shall be tried de novo in the district court and said court shall have the same power and authority as the county board of adjustment, together with all other powers of the district court in

law or in equity. An appeal to the Supreme Court from the decision of the district court shall be allowed as in other cases. Added by Laws 1957, p. 136, § 24, emerg. eff. May 31, 1957.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1994–2017 · leading case: Osage Nation v. Bd. of Commissioners of Osage Cnty. & Osage Nation v. Osage Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2017 OK 34 (Okla. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Osage Nation v. Bd. of Commissioners of Osage Cnty. & Osage Nation v. Osage Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2017 OK 34 (Okla. 2017). · cites it 6× “10 This Act also contains a similar ten-day requirement for an appeal from a Board of Adjustment to a District Court: 19 O.S.2011 § 866.24. 11 ¶12 A statutory time limit for commencing an appeal has been historically viewed as jurisdictional in nature 12 and beyond a court's…”
Roberts v. Sw. Bell Mobile Sys., Inc., 709 N.E.2d 798 (Mass. 1999). “§ 14-56-425 (Michie 1998); Oklahoma, Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 19, § 866.24 (West 1988); and Vermont, Vt.”
Bankoff v. Bd. of Adjustment, 875 P.2d 1138 (Okla. 1994). “Title 19 O.S.1991 § 866.24 provides in part: “[s]aid cause shall be tried de novo in the District Court and said Court shall have the same power and authority as the County Board of Adjustment, together with all other powers of the District Court in law or in equity.”
Mustang Run Wind Proj., LLC v. Osage Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2016 OK 113 (Okla. 2016). · cites it 2× “24 provides in part: "[s]aid cause shall be tried de novo in the District Court and said Court shall have the same power and authority as the County Board of Adjustment, together with all other powers of the District Court in law or in equity.”
Osage Nation v. Bd. of Commissioners of Osage Cnty. & Osage Nation v. Osage Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2017 OK 34 (Okla. 2017). · cites it 13× “10 This Act also contains a similar ten-day requirement for an appeal from a Board of Adjustment to a District Court: 19 O.S.2011 § 866.24. 11 ¶12 A statutory time limit for commencing an appeal has been historically viewed as jurisdictional in nature 12 and beyond a court's…”
Holtzen v. Tulsa Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 97 P.3d 1150 (Okla. Civ. App. 2004). “22, which provides for a judicial review of the Board's required findings. . In its filings, Bell’s included an affidavit from an official with the Indian Nation Council of Governments, stating the plan states that it is a guide and that there may be times when it would ' be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.