Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1541.2 (2026)
See the following versions:
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
OS 21-1541.2v1 (HB 2751, Laws 2016, c. 221, § 5) OS 21-1541.2v2 (HB 2104, Laws 2025, c. 486, § 238)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1975–2024 · leading case: Middaugh v. State, 767 P.2d 432 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988).
Middaugh v. State, 767 P.2d 432 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988). “1981 , § 1592, and three counts of Obtaining Merchandise and/or Money by Means of False and Bogus Checks in violation of 21 O.S.Supp. 1982, § 1541.2, all After Former Conviction of Two or More Felonies, in violation of 21 O.”
Morales, Jr. v. Jones, 417 F. App'x 746 (10th Cir. 2011). “As the other conviction is not before us, we discuss it no further. 4 . The basis for Morales’ claim appears to be the fact that he wrote an insufficient funds check drawn on an Oklahoma bank account to a Texas tool supplier.”
George Finbar Ross v. United States Marshal for the E. Dist. of Oklahoma, 168 F.3d 1190 (10th Cir. 1999). “§§ 1341 and 1343, and the Oklahoma false pretenses statute; Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1541.2 . Mr. Ross argues the warrants charging him with “false accounting” do not meet the duality requirement.”
Gowler v. State, 589 P.2d 682 (Okla. Crim. App. 1978). “*684 OPINION CORNISH, Judge: Wayne Ray Gowler, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was charged with the crime of Obtaining Merchandise by Means and Use of a False and Bogus Check, in violation of 21 O.S.1971, § 1541.2. The defendant was found guilty by a jury in Oklahoma…”
United States v. Robert Reen Pennon, 816 F.2d 527 (10th Cir. 1987). “See Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1541.2 (Supp.1986).”
Coots v. State, 560 P.2d 592 (Okla. Crim. App. 1977). “Coots, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged with the offense of Obtaining Merchandise by Means and Use of a False and Bogus Check, After Former Conviction of a Felony, in violation of 21 O.S.1971, § 1541.2, and was tried and convicted in the District Court, Oklahoma…”
Jones v. State, 595 P.2d 1344 (Okla. Crim. App. 1979). “CRF-77-1094, of the offense of Uttering and Passing a Bogus Check, After Former Conviction of a Felony, in violation of 21 O.S.1971, § 1541.2. His punishment was fixed at ten (10) years’ imprisonment, and from said judgment and sentence an appeal has been perfected to this Court.”
McCaskey v. State, 781 P.2d 836 (Okla. Crim. App. 1989). “McCaskey, Appellant, was charged by information for the crime of *837 Obtaining Money by False Pretenses (21 O.S.1981, § 1541.2) in Rogers County, Case No.”
Sweatte v. State, 732 P.2d 476 (Okla. Crim. App. 1987). “Sweatte, was convicted in Cleveland County District Court of Obtaining Money by False Pretense in violation of 21 O.S.1981, § 1541.2, Case No. CRF-83-46(M), and was fined five thousand dollars ($5,000), and he appeals.”
Rainey v. State, 755 P.2d 89 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988). “Next, the appellant contends that the trial court committed reversible error in failing to give his requested instruction that would permit the jury to consider evidence that the checks to Civic Supply Company were for past sales, and therefore did not fall within the acts…”
Broadway v. State, 818 P.2d 1253 (Okla. Crim. App. 1991). “OPINION PARKS, Judge: Emanuel Broadway, appellant, was tried by jury and convicted of Obtaining Merchandise or Money by Trick or Deception (21 O.S.Supp.1982, § 1541.2), After Former Conviction of a Felony, in Oklahoma County District Court Case No.”
Thomas v. State, 744 P.2d 974 (Okla. Crim. App. 1987). “OPINION BUSSEY, Judge: Appellant, Jan Thomas, was charged with four counts of Obtaining Merchandise by Means of Bogus Check After Former Conviction of a Felony in violation of 21 O.S., § 1541.2, in the District Court of Pon-totoc County, Case No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.