Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 995.1 (2026)

Repealed by Laws 1992, c. 328, § 33, eff. Dec. 1, 1992,

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

and State Question No. 650, Legislative Referendum No. 294, at election held Nov. 3, 1992.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1990–1991 · leading case: State ex rel. Moss v. New Day Tabernacle, 801 P.2d 742 (Okla. Civ. App. 1990).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State ex rel. Moss v. New Day Tabernacle, 801 P.2d 742 (Okla. Civ. App. 1990). “Such operation of bingo games in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.1984 §§ 995.1, 995.1a and 995.”

Rider v. State, 815 P.2d 198 (Okla. Crim. App. 1991). “On appeal, the State concedes that inasmuch as appellant admitted at trial that he had no state license, the instruction which mimics the language set forth in 21 O.S.Supp.1989, § 995.1, was irrelevant.”

United States v. Ed J. Hagen, Also Known as J. Ewald Martha Jo \Marjo\" Hagen & William C. Hagen, 951 F.2d 261 (1991). “The penalty section applicable to violations of the Oklahoma bingo statutes ( Okla. Stat. tit. 21, §§ 995.1 et seq.) expressly declares that “[a]ny person violating the provisions of this act .”

Oklahoma State Navy Ladies Auxiliary & Marine Corps, Licenses to Conduct Bingo Game, Dist. 3A1, 3A2 & 3A4 v. Macy, 821 P.2d 397 (Okla. Civ. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “Appellant contends that it qualified under 21 O.S.1981 § 995.1 for issuance of a bingo license because it qualifies as a nonprofit organization under 26 U.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.