Okla. Stat. » Title 22 — CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 1141.1 (2026)

Definitions

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Where appearing in this act, the term "Governor" includes any person performing the functions of Governor by authority of the law of this state. The term "executive authority" includes the Governor, and any person performing the functions of Governor in a

state other than this state, and the term "state", referring to a state other than this state, includes any other state or territory, organized or unorganized, of the United States of America. Added by Laws 1949, p. 206, § 1, emerg. eff. March 25, 1949.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1953–2018 · leading case: Bramlett v. State, 2018 OK CR 19, 422 P.3d 788.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bramlett v. State, 2018 OK CR 19, 422 P.3d 788. · cites it 2× “2 ¶13 Bramlett's complaint concerns his extradition to Oklahoma from Illinois under the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act (Extradition Act) (22 O.S.2011, §§ 1141.1 -- 1141.30) and his summons from Illinois to Oklahoma as a material witness under The Uniform Act to Secure the…”
Holbird v. State, 650 P.2d 66 (Okla. Crim. App. 1982). “The Uniform Criminal Extradition Act found in 22 O.S.1981, § 1141.1 et seq., provides specific procedures to be followed for the arrest and return of a criminal suspect who is outside the jurisdiction of this State.”
Habeas Corpus of Anderson v. State, 386 P.2d 320 (Okla. Crim. App. 1963). · cites it 2× “22 O.S.1951 § 1141.1, et seq.” “One sought to be extradited must be charged with a crime in the demanding state and must be a fugitive from justice of such state.”
In re the Habeas Corpus of Langley, 325 P.2d 1094 (Okla. Crim. App. 1958). “’ “Since the passage of the Uniform Criminal Extradition Law in 1949 by the state of Oklahoma, 22 O.S.1951, §§ 1141.1 to 1141.30, this court has held: “ ‘Where extradition papers required by statute are in proper form and extradition warrant has been issued by the Governor, and…”
Carter v. State, 708 P.2d 1097 (Okla. 1985). “Accordingly, the ruling of the trial court denying this motion and entering judgment for appellee is REVERSED.”
Rider v. McLeod, 323 P.2d 741 (Okla. Crim. App. 1958). “Although the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act was adopted in Oklahoma in 1949 (22 O.S.1951 § 1141.1 et seq.) and the Interstate Parole Compact in 1945, these acts were not discussed, but in the body of the opinion the court did discuss the validity of a written parole .”
Ellerman v. State, 660 P.2d 647 (Okla. Crim. App. 1983). “Petitioner contends that he is not a fugitive subject to extradition under the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, 22 O.S.1981, § 1141.1, et seq. This contention is not well taken.”
James v. State, 584 P.2d 213 (Okla. 1978). “On February 25th, 1976 appellant Donald Ray James was charged with being a fugitive from justice under the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, 22 O.S.1971, §§ 1141.1 et seq. Under provisions of 22 O.”
Ex Parte Crawford, 342 P.2d 580 (Okla. Crim. App. 1959). “However, this court is concerned chiefly with the question of whether petitioner is a fugitive as to warrant extradition since the passage of the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act 1949, 22 O.S.1951 § 1141.1 et seq. This court has held that the court is limited in its inquiry as…”
Ex parte Jackson, 262 P.2d 722 (Okla. Crim. App. 1953). “” Since the passage of the Uniform Criminal Extradition Law in 1949 by the State of Oklahoma, 22 O.S.1951 §§ 1141.1 to 1141.30, this court has held: *725 “Where extradition papers required by statute are in proper form' and extradition warrant ■ has been issued by the Governor,…”
Langham v. Cochran, 357 P.2d 583 (Okla. Crim. App. 1960). “When petitioner has completed his sentence at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary, if he does not agree to waive extradition to Florida, the rights of the Florida authorities may be tested by way of habeas corpus, as limited by the Uniform Extradition Act, 22 O.S.1951 § 1141.1 et…”
Bramlett v. State, 2018 OK CR 19. “2 ¶13 Bramlett's complaint concerns his extradition to Oklahoma from Illinois under the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act (Extradition Act) (22 O.S.2011, §§ 1141.1 -- 1141.30) and his summons from Illinois to Oklahoma as a material witness under The Uniform Act to Secure the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.