Okla. Stat. » Title 22 — CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 1141.6 (2026)

Surrender of persons not fleeing from demanding state

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The Governor of this state may also surrender, on demand of the executive authority of any other state, any person in this state charged in such other state in the manner provided in Section 3 with committing an act in this state, or in a third state, intentionally resulting in a crime in the state whose executive authority is making the demand, and the provisions of this act not otherwise inconsistent, shall apply to such cases, even though the accused was not in that state at the time of the commission of the crime, and has not fled therefrom. Laws 1949, p. 207, § 6.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1953–1963 · leading case: Habeas Corpus of Anderson v. State, 386 P.2d 320 (Okla. Crim. App. 1963).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Habeas Corpus of Anderson v. State, 386 P.2d 320 (Okla. Crim. App. 1963). “6 of Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, 22 O.S.Supp. § 1141.6, the only evidence admissible on habeas corpus to secure release from custody under the warrant of extradition is such as may tend to prove that defendant was not in demanding- state at time crime was allegedly…”
Ex parte Crawford, 342 P.2d 580 (Okla. Crim. App. 1959). “6 of Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, 22 O.S.Supp. § 1141.6, the only evidence admissible on habeas corpus to secure release from custody under the warrant of extradition is such as may tend to prove that defendant was not in demanding state at time crime was allegedly…”
Ex parte Jackson, 262 P.2d 722 (Okla. Crim. App. 1953). “30, this court has held: *725 “Where extradition papers required by statute are in proper form' and extradition warrant ■ has been issued by the Governor, and the extradition is not based upon the provisions of Sec.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.