Okla. Stat. » Title 22 — CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 2001 (2026)

Short title - Scope

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 1 and 2 of this act shall be known and may be cited as the "Oklahoma Criminal Discovery Code". The Oklahoma Criminal Discovery Code shall govern the procedure for discovery in all criminal cases in all courts in this state. Added by Laws 1994, c. 292, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1997–2021 · leading case: Dodd v. State, 2004 OK CR 31 (Okla. Crim. App. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dodd v. State, 2004 OK CR 31 (Okla. Crim. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “The Criminal Discovery Code, 22 O.S.2001, § 2001 et seq., provides for fair disclosure of evidence anticipated to be used at trial.”
Lambert v. State, 2003 OK CR 11 (Okla. Crim. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “[10] 22 O.S.2001, § 2001 et seq. [11] Lambert has already been convicted of first degree murder, and the determination of mental retardation is not a finding of guilt or innocence.”
Short v. State, 1999 OK CR 15 (Okla. Crim. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “¶ 21 Prior to trial, discovery motions were filed by both the prosecution and the defense. Eleven days prior to trial, the defense filed its witness list and summary of testimony.”
Powell v. State, 2000 OK CR 5 (Okla. Crim. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “Of course, Allen has been superceded by the Oklahoma Criminal Discovery Code, 22 O.S.Supp.1994, § 2001 et seq. [13] Applying these provisions, 22 O.”
Stevens v. State, 2018 OK CR 11 (Okla. Crim. App. 2018). “22 O.S.2011, § 2001 et seq. The assigned trial judge has the authority under our Discovery Code to issue any orders necessary to accomplish this task.”
Murphy v. State, 2002 OK CR 32 (Okla. Crim. App. 2002). “The Oklahoma Criminal Discovery Code, 22 O.S.2001, § 2001 et seq., shall be applicable to any evidence relating to the issue of mental retardation.”
Braun v. State, 937 P.2d 505 (Okla. Crim. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “The Oklahoma Criminal Discovery code is found at 22 O.S.Supp.1994, § 2001 et seq. [1] 885 P.”
Dodd v. State, 2000 OK CR 2 (Okla. Crim. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “¶ 2 Initially, the case presents the question of whether the disclosure of impeachment evidence is encompassed within the provisions of the Oklahoma Criminal Discovery Code, 22 O.S.Supp.1994, § 2001 et seq. An analysis of this issue begins with the recognition both in the Code…”
White v. State, 1998 OK CR 69 (Okla. Crim. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “¶ 8 This Court must determine first whether the criminal discovery code, 22 O.S.Supp.1996, §§ 2001 and 2002, requires all mental health experts to issue reports of their opinions to comply with the notice provisions of the discovery code.”
Allen v. State, 944 P.2d 934 (Okla. Crim. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “I do not think that is the intent of the Oklahoma Criminal Discovery Code, 22 O.S.Supp.1996, § 2001 et seq. The language contained in the opinion is too broad, and I do not believe it was the intent of this Court to go after a gnat with a sledgehammer by holding the Oklahoma…”
State, Ex Rel. Lane v. Bass, 2004 OK CR 14 (Okla. Crim. App. 2004). “However, by this Order and until further amendment to this Court's rules, we hereby establish the procedure for both parties to follow when seeking an interlocutory appeal from a trial court's order granting or denying a Motion to Quash Bill of Particulars on grounds of Mental…”
Bland v. State, 991 P.2d 1039 (Okla. Crim. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “In considering such discovery requests, this Court shall presume the parties complied with all discovery orders issued by the District Court at the time of trial and in accordance with 22 O.S.1991, §§ 2001 and 2002. Rule 9.7(D)(3).”
Show all 15 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.